Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
A CARDI PROJECT Prepared for the  First International Workshop on Intensive Rice Production Sponsored by Cornell and EARTH...
OBJECTIVE <ul><li>The objective of the  rice trials is t o evaluate the UDP technology in the Caribbean by comparing it wi...
THE CARIBBEAN
BURMA RICE RESEARCH STATION IN GUYANA
BACKGROUND <ul><li>Rice ( Oryza sativa  L.) falls within the Cereal and Grain Legumes sub-programme of CARDI’s Crop Progra...
METHODOLOGY  <ul><li>Location: Burma Rice Research Station –  </li></ul><ul><li>Soils: frontland clays;  </li></ul><ul><li...
METHODOLOGY (cont’d) Table 1  The treatments 7 field trials were conducted between 2009 – 2010 in Guyana  * A single contr...
METHODOLOGY (cont’d) <ul><li>Plot size: 6 m x 8 m </li></ul><ul><li>Rice variety: G98-22-4 </li></ul><ul><li>Seed rate: 12...
METHODOLOGY (cont’d) <ul><li>Number of filled grains per panicle </li></ul><ul><li>Number of unfilled grains per panicle <...
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS <ul><li>Table 2  Data on grain yield (kg/ha) combined for all 7 trials </li></ul>LSD  0.05  = 514 ...
Table 3  The best treatments which produced significant  differences in the individual trials and for the combined data Pa...
CONCLUSIONS <ul><li>The best treatments were UDP 57 and UB 57; they produced the tallest plants, the highest straw weight ...
CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES <ul><li>Further work should measure and compare costs of production and the effects of the resi...
Figure 1 Panoramic view of UDP trials before flowering;  note difference in green leaf colour between plots
Figure 2: View of plots before harvest
Figure 3: Highest rate of N caused extensive lodging
Thank you
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

1181-Evaluation of the Urea Deep Placement (UDP) Technology in Irrigated Lowland, Direct Seeded Rice in Guyana

1,876 views

Published on

PowerPoint by Herman Adams, CARDI, presented at the First Workshop on the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Latin America at EARTH University in Costa Rica, Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 2011

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

1181-Evaluation of the Urea Deep Placement (UDP) Technology in Irrigated Lowland, Direct Seeded Rice in Guyana

  1. 1. A CARDI PROJECT Prepared for the First International Workshop on Intensive Rice Production Sponsored by Cornell and EARTH Universities, Las Mercedes, Costa Rica 31 October – 1 November 2011 Evaluation of the Urea Deep Placement (UDP) Technology in Irrigated Lowland, Direct-Seeded Rice in Guyana Herman Adams and Bruce Lauckner, Collaborators: Ghansham Payman (GRDB) and Upendra Singh (IFDC)
  2. 2. OBJECTIVE <ul><li>The objective of the rice trials is t o evaluate the UDP technology in the Caribbean by comparing it with the conventional method of broadcasting urea (UB) fertiliser into the flooded field over the rice transplants. </li></ul>
  3. 3. THE CARIBBEAN
  4. 4. BURMA RICE RESEARCH STATION IN GUYANA
  5. 5. BACKGROUND <ul><li>Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) falls within the Cereal and Grain Legumes sub-programme of CARDI’s Crop Programme. </li></ul><ul><li>PROGRAMME STRATEGIC FOCI: </li></ul><ul><li>1) Genetic improvement </li></ul><ul><li>The rice variety “CARDI-70” was released in Belize in 1988. </li></ul><ul><li>2) Agronomic improvement </li></ul><ul><li>The innovative UDP technology, the placement of urea briquettes 7-10 cm below the roots of 14-day-old rice seedlings, has raised grain yields by 25% and reduced losses in N from 65% down to almost zero, in Bangladesh and Vietnam (IFDC). </li></ul>
  6. 6. METHODOLOGY <ul><li>Location: Burma Rice Research Station – </li></ul><ul><li>Soils: frontland clays; </li></ul><ul><li>Mean Annual Temperature:19.8°C – 33.5°C; Mean annual rainfall: 2298 cm </li></ul><ul><li>Design: RCB </li></ul><ul><li>7 treatments in a 3*2 factorial (UB and UDP); </li></ul><ul><li>Control = 0 Nitrogen </li></ul><ul><li>Time of application: UDP – 12-14 DAS and UB - conventional 3 split apps </li></ul><ul><li>Replications: 4 </li></ul>
  7. 7. METHODOLOGY (cont’d) Table 1 The treatments 7 field trials were conducted between 2009 – 2010 in Guyana * A single control RATES OF N (kg/ha) METHOD OF UREA APPLICATION UREA BROADCAST (UB) UREA DEEP PLACEMENT (UDP) 57 UB 57 UDP 57 84 UB 84 UDP 84 122 UB 122 UDP 122 0 Control* Control*
  8. 8. METHODOLOGY (cont’d) <ul><li>Plot size: 6 m x 8 m </li></ul><ul><li>Rice variety: G98-22-4 </li></ul><ul><li>Seed rate: 120 kg/ha </li></ul><ul><li>Analyses at harvest from nett plot (2 m x 4 m): </li></ul><ul><li>Number of tillers per m² </li></ul><ul><li>Number of panicles per m² </li></ul><ul><li>Panicle length (cm) </li></ul><ul><li>1000 grain weight (g) </li></ul>
  9. 9. METHODOLOGY (cont’d) <ul><li>Number of filled grains per panicle </li></ul><ul><li>Number of unfilled grains per panicle </li></ul><ul><li>Grain yield per nett plot (kg) </li></ul><ul><li>Total dry matter at 14% moisture content (kg) </li></ul>
  10. 10. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS <ul><li>Table 2 Data on grain yield (kg/ha) combined for all 7 trials </li></ul>LSD 0.05 = 514 Treatment Means Rank UB 84 3,455 I UDP 84 3,400 II UDP 122 3,380 III UB 57 3,287 IV UDP 57 3,144 V UB 122 3,124 VI Control 2,632 VII
  11. 11. Table 3 The best treatments which produced significant differences in the individual trials and for the combined data Parameters which showed significant differences Best treatments 1.Plant height in Trial # 1 UDP 57 and UB 57 2.Grain yield in Trial # 2 UDP 57 and UB 84 3.Grain yield in Trial # 3 UDP 84 and UB 57 4.Straw dry weight in Trial # 4 UDP 57 5.Filled grains in Trial # 6 UDP 57 6.Dry grain yield in Trial # 6 UDP 57 and UB 57 7.Wet grain yield in Trial # 6 UDP 57 8.Dry grain yield in Trial # 7 UDP 57 and UB 84 9.Wet straw weight in Trial # 7 UDP 57 and UB 57 10.Grain yield from combined data from all 7 trials UDP 57 and UB 57
  12. 12. CONCLUSIONS <ul><li>The best treatments were UDP 57 and UB 57; they produced the tallest plants, the highest straw weight and yields which were not significantly lower than any other treatments. </li></ul><ul><li>These treatments however had the least input of N but were significantly higher than the Control of no N. This means that these two treatments would produce good yields at a low cost of production, urea being the single most costly input. </li></ul><ul><li>No advantage was demonstrated by UDP 57 over UB 57. </li></ul>
  13. 13. CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES <ul><li>Further work should measure and compare costs of production and the effects of the residual N left in the soil, for the following crop. </li></ul><ul><li>Large scale field trials are required to study costs of production. </li></ul><ul><li>The next phase should evaluate mechanised minimum-till sowing with simultaneous placement of fertiliser briquettes (UDP) with plant nutritional needs during the entire cropping cycle. </li></ul>
  14. 14. Figure 1 Panoramic view of UDP trials before flowering; note difference in green leaf colour between plots
  15. 15. Figure 2: View of plots before harvest
  16. 16. Figure 3: Highest rate of N caused extensive lodging
  17. 17. Thank you

×