Slides for presentation to the Plant Protection/IPM program in Hanoi, Vietnam, January 4, 2005.
SRI was developed in Madagascar about 20 years ago, by Fr. Henri de Laulani é, SJ, who spent 34 years of his life in that country, far from his native France, working with farmers, observing, experimenting, and having some good luck, to synthesize a set of practices that changes many things farmers have done for centuries and even millennia, to good effect. This presentation is not about SRI per se, so gives only a brief characterization of the System, documented in other presentations.
SRI departs from the usual concepts and practices, where one uses more and better inputs to get even more outputs; with SRI, one reduces inputs but capitalizes upon synergies and symbioses inherent within agroecological systems.
This is the most simple description of what SRI entails. Transplanting is not necesssary since direct seeding, with the other SRI practices, also produces similarly good results. The principle of SRI is that if transplanting is done , very young seedling should be used, and there should be little or no trauma to the young plant roots. These are often ‘abused’ in transplanting process, being allowed to dry out (desiccate), or are knocked to remove soil, etc.
SRI is an evolving methodology
SRI is often hard to accept because it does not depend on either of the two main strategies of the Green Revolution, not requiring any change in the rice variety used (genotype) or an increase in external inputs. The latter can be reduced.
Picture provided by Dr. Koma Yang Saing, director, Cambodian Center for the Study and Development of Agriculture (CEDAC), September 2004. Dr. Koma himself tried SRI methods in 1999, and once satisfied that they worked, got 28 farmers in 2000 to try them. From there the numbers have increased each year, to 400, then 2100, then 9100, then almost 17,000. Over 50,000 farmers are expecting to be using SRI in 2005. Ms. Sarim previously produced 2-3 t/ha on her field. In 2004, some parts of this field reached a yield of 11 t/ha, where the soil was most ‘biologized’ from SRI practices.
Picture provided by Rajendra Uprety, District Agricultural Development Office, Morang District, Nepal, of single SRI plant.
Picture provided by Rajendra Uprety, District Agricultural Development Office, Biratnagar, serving Morang District, Nepal, September 2005. This plant was growing outside the field, so it had plenty of space to expand. About half the tillers are fertile. Many SRI plants grown within SRI fields around Biratnagar produced over 100 tillers. On August 18, 2004, the Director-General for Agriculture for Nepal visited Morang district and counted 119 tillers on one SRI plant only 48 days old.
Picture provided by Dr. A. Satyanarayana, at the time Director of Extension for Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU), the agricultural university for Andhra Pradesh state in India. Dr. Satyanarayana was a co-recipient with ICRISAT of the King Baudoin Award in 2002, the CGIAR’s highest award, as a plant breeder working on (drought-resistant) pulses. He has become the leader of SRI evaluation and dissemination efforts in Andhra Pradesh based on observed and measured results.
Picture provided by Dr. P. V. Satyanarayana, the plant breeder who developed this very popular variety, which also responds very well to SRI practices.
Picture provided by Dr. Rena Perez. These two rice plants are ‘twins’ in that they were planted on the same day in the same nursery from the same seed bag. The one on the right was taken out at 9 days and transplanted into an SRI environment. The one on the left was kept in the flooded nursery until its 52 nd day, when it was taken out for transplanting (in Cuba, transplanting of commonly done between 50 and 55 DAP). The difference in root growth and tillering (5 vs. 42) is spectacular. We think this difference is at least in part attributable to the contributions of soil microorganisms producing phytohormones in the rhizosphere that benefit plant growth and performance.
This field was harvested in March 2004 with representatives from the Department of Agriculture present to measure the yield. Picture provided by George Rakotondrabe, Landscape Development Interventions project, which has worked with Association Tefy Saina in spreading the use of SRI to reduce land pressures on the remaining rainforest areas.
Figures from a paper presented by Dr. Tao to international rice conference organized by the China National Rice Research Institute for the International Year of Rice and World Food Day, held in Hangzhou, October 15-17, 2004. Dr. Tao has been doing research on SRI since 2001 to evaluate its effects in physiological terms.
This figure is based on research findings from the China National Rice Research Institute, reported at the Sanya conference in April 2002 and published in the conference proceedings. Two different rice varieties were used (top and bottom rows) with SRI and conventional (CK) methods (left and right columns). The second variety responded more positively to the SRI methods in terms of leaf area and dry matter as measured at different elevations, but there was a very obvious difference in the phenotypes produced from the first variety's genome by changing cultivation methods from conventional to SRI. Both leaf area and dry matter were significantly increased by using SRI methods.
Figure from research on SRI done by the Crop Research Institute of the Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, comparing leaf area of SRI rice with conventional rice, same variety and otherwise same growing conditions.
Figure from a report by Nanjing Agricultural University researchers to the 2002 Sanya conference, and reproduced from the conference proceedings. It shows that the oxygenation ability of rice roots growing under SRI conditions are about double the ability, throughout the growth cycle, compared to the same variety grown under conventional conditions. At maturity, the SRI roots have still almost 3x the oxygenation ability of conventionally grown rice plants.
This picture from Sri Lanka shows two fields having the same soil, climate and irrigation access, during a drought period. On the left, the rice grown with conventional practices, with continuous flooding from the time of transplanting, has a shallower root system that cannot withstand water stress. On the right, SRI rice receiving less water during its growth has deeper rooting, and thus it can continue to thrive during the drought. Farmers in Sri Lanka are coming to accept SRI in part because it reduces their risk of crop failure during drought.
Picture provided by Dr. T. M. Thiyagarajan, dean of TNAU college of agriculture at Killikulam, who has been evaluating SRI since 2000 and promoting it since 2002.
Provided by Max Whitten, former head of plant pathology for ACIAR in Australia, who is working with Farmer Field Schools in many Southeast Asian countries, including demonstrations of SRI.
Picture provided by Gamini Batuwitage, at the time Sr. Asst. Secretary of Agriculture, Sri Lanka, of SRI field that yielded 13 t/ha in 2000, the first year SRI was used in that country. Such performance got SRI started there.
Chaboussou’s book was only recently translated, after being largely neglected for almost 20 years. It could be one of the most significant books in agricultural science for the past 50 years. It is based on published literature (in mainstream, peer-reviewed journals) since 1930.
This is explained in the book by Chaboussou for which reference is given above.
This is explained in the book referenced above.
These at not always stated but we try to communicate these principles and give this advice wherever possible. The persons working on SRI dissemination are agreed on this approach, which is consistent with what Fr. de Laulani é wanted from farmers and for farmers. See his book, Le Riz à Madagascar: Un dèveloppement en dialogue avec les paysans . Editions Karthala, Paris, 2003.
These benefits are emerging as we reflect on the participatory development and diffusion of SRI.
Premaratna was the first farmer in Sri Lanka to use SRI methods, having read about them in the ILEIA newsletter. His first yields were 10 and 15 t/ha, on soil that was already being used for ‘organic farming’ the past five years. He became a champion for SRI on a national scale, and has been hired by the Australian affiliate of Oxfam (CAA) to take SRI methods into east coast areas still under LTTE (Tamil Tiger) control. Already by 2002, he had trained at least 4,000 farmers in SRI methods, having built a small, simple ‘schoolhouse’ on the edge of his fields where lectures could be given in a rural setting on how to practice SRI.
This design by Premaratna is very popular with many farmers, as it speeds up their weeding operations, saving much time as there are no spokes to get clogged with weeds.
This was built with a wooden axle, into which bent large nails were driven, with the axle mounted on a simple iron-rod frame. The ‘rake’ at the back was added to increase the soil aeration. Nong estimated that he got $20 more worth of rice yield from his small plot with this soil-aerating weeder, for the cost of $3 in materials and about 75 cents worth of labor.
Elske van de Fliert (FAO Vegetable IPM program in Vietnam) provided this picture and this information. She was impressed with their understanding of the need for and benefits from collective action in connection with SRI.
Gopal Swaminathan was one of the first SRI farmers in the Cauvery delta. His Kadiramangalam system was devised for delta areas where sun and wind desiccate tiny seedlings; so he transplants 15-day seedlings in clumps of 5 plants, at 30x30 cm spacing, and then re-transplants them at 30 days, as single plants per hill at that spacing. The extra labor means that there is almost zero mortality, and yields of 7.5 t/ha are assuredly attained.
This is Subasinghe Ariyaratna’s own design. He is a small rice farmer (2 ha) in Mahaweli System ‘H’ of Sri Lanka. He has also devised a method of crop establishment that is labor saving. Instead of transplanting young seedlings 10 days old, at a seed rate of 5 kg/ha, he germinates seed and broadcasts it on prepared muddy soil at a rate of 25 kg/ha. Then at 10 days, when the seedlings are established, he ‘weeds’ the field as recommended for SRI, with rows 25x25 cm, in both directions, removing (churning under) about 80% of the seedlings, leaving just 1 or maybe 2 or 3 plants at the intersections of his passes. This saves the labor of making and managing a nursery and of transplanting, at a cost of 20 kg of seed/ha. He says this can assure a yield of 7.5 t/ha. As his household labor supply is limited (he has two young children and his wife teaches), he needs to economize on labor.
This was developed in 2003 by Mr. L. Reddy, to replace the use of strings and sticks to mark lines for planting, or the use of a wooden “rake” that could mark lines when pulled across the paddy in two directions. This implement, which can be built for any spacing desired, enables farmers, after it is pulled across the paddy in one direction, to plant SRI seedlings in a 25x250 cm square pattern. It saves as lot of labor time for transplanting because only one pass is needed across the field, and this is wider than a rake could be. Even wider ones have been built. Mr. Reddy is a very innovative and successful SRI farmer, with a superb yield last rabi season, measured and reported by the Department of Extension in Andhra Pradesh. This yield was the average for a 9-acre rice farm. In one plot, the yield measured by the Dept. staff was 20 t/ha; Reddy was disappointed that they would not report this separately. Instead, they just averaged this for the whole-farm statistic.
This plot of Liu Zhibin’s was harvested just before my visit, with an official certificate for a yield of 13.4 t/ha. In 2001, when Liu first used SRI methods, on soil that has been kept well supplied with organic matter, he got a yield of 16 t/ha which helped to persuade Prof. Yuan Long-ping, ‘the father of hybrid rice’ in China, to become more interested in SRI. Liu is manager for the seed farm that produces hybrid seed for Prof. Yuan’s operations.
Nie is the farmer-demonstrator for the village, a kind of ‘master farmer’ in US extension terminology. He showed us the five experimental plots that he had set up, on his own initiative, within the SRI system, to evaluate raised beds, no-till cultivation, and every wide spacing (50x50 cm). The next year, he experimented with direct-seeding and no-till SRI cultivation. His example persuaded 438 farmers in two neighboring villages to use SRI on 65 continguous hectares of paddy land in 2005.
Results posted by Mr. Nie Fu Qiu, Bu Tou village, on his field, from trials with different combinations of land preparation (till/no-till) and crop establishment (by machine and by hand). He built his own direct-seeding machine, to plant single seeds at spacing of 30.3 x 23.5 cm in rectangular pattern. The no-till practice is expected to give higher yields in subsequent seasons as soil organic matter is built up. Both no-till and direct-seeding by machine reduce labor time and costs.
Built by Luis Romero, one of the most successful SRI farmers in Cuba, to plant germinated seeds at 40x40 cm spacing. The seeds are put in the respective bins and dropped at the bins rotate. For his field, Luis found that 40x40 cm was too wide, because of weed problems. He has built one for 30x30 cm now. His neighbor built a seeder with 12 bins, four times as wide, that can be pulled by oxen to further save labor. The important thing to know is that farmers are working on their own ways to reduce SRI labor requirements because they see the benefits of wide spacing, aerated soil, etc.
This is a picture sent by Thadeusz Niesiobedzki in Poland, of his winter wheat crop that is being grown with single seedlings, wide spacing, use of organic matter, etc. approximating SRI. He hit upon these practices by accident (a long story) and also discovered the SRI internet web page, and saw the similarities between his practices and SRI, thereafter contacting Cornell by email to open up dialogue.
The Guli Vidhana methodology, being promoted by the Green Foundation, Bangalore, was developed by farmers for rainfed conditions. They plow furrows across the field in a grid pattern, 18 x 18 inches (45x45 cm) and then a handful of cow dung or compost is put at all the intersections of the furrows, and two seedlings are planted at each intersection. When the seedlings are 25 days old, still supple, a long board is pulled across the field in several directions by oxen, bending the plants over, right at ground level, in many directions. This shock to the plant in its meristematic region triggers the production of many adventitious roots that grow into the ground in different directions and also profuse tillering, 25-30 tillers per plant, with the heads of millet also being numerous and compact (‘fisty’). A very large increase in yield, shown in the slide from an extension poster produced by the Green Foundation, results.
These pictures of finger millet roots, all at 60 days of age, with different dates (ages) of transplanting, confirm the observations with SRI that using younger seedlings for transplanting will result in more vigorous root (and shoot) growth. Pictures from staff of the Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University in Hyderabad, India, the state agricultural university for Andhra Pradesh.
This method has been developed by Prabhakar Reddy, one of the first SRI farmers in Andhra Pradesh state, and is being monitored and documented by Dr. Shashi Bhushan, ANGRAU faculty member. Reddy was explicitly adapting his SRI experience to sugar cane production, with similarly large increases in production from reduced planting material.
Chickens reared on compost heaps can feed on worms and insects in the compost, giving them a more protein-rich diet. They enhance the nutrient value of the compost by adding chicken manure directly to it. Chickens can be kept well-watered and healthier during the hot, dry summer season, when free-ranging chickens suffer from thirst. They are safe from predators and from thieves when reared this way. Farmers suggested a connection between these practices and what they had learned from the practice of SRI.
From report by Rajendra Uprety, District Agricultural Development Office, Biratnagar, Nepal – for Morang District. Available from SRI home page on the web.
This was first reported in Sri Lanka in 2002, where rice millers in the Mahaweli system began coming to SRI fields and offering to buy the crop when harvested for 10% more per bushel. This indicated that they must be getting more than a 10% higher outturn of milled rice; otherwise they would be losing money, which is something millers seldom do purposefully.
Prof. Ma Jun in his paper to the Haerbin conference included data on rice quality that he had collected. They showed SRI rice grains (from three different spacings within the SRI range) to be clearly superior in two major respects to conventionally-grown grains (two spacings). A reduction in chalkiness makes the rice more palatable. An increase in outturn is a ‘bonus’ on top of the higher yields of paddy (unmilled) rice that farmers get with SRI methods. We have seen this kind of improvement in outturn rates in Cuba, India and Sri Lanka, about 15%. More research on other aspects of SRI grain quality should be done, including nutritional content.
SRI defies usual logic – that to get more, you have to invest more. But “less” can produce “more,” for a number of different, but reinforcing reasons, well grounded in the scientific literature. USDA research by Kumar and associates (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, US, 2004) shows how changed growing conditions in the root zone affects the expression of genes in leaf tissue cells, affecting senescence and disease resistance. This research gives clues for explaining how SRI practices produce different phenotypes.
These data were provided by, respectively, the China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China; the Crop Research Institute of the Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China; the Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU), Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh State, India; and the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) College of Agriculture, Killikulam, Tamil Nadu State, India. The data from the on-going evaluation of SRI by these institutions.
Tefy Saina is more comfortable communicating in French language, though it can handle English. CIIFAD has worldwide contacts on SRI through the internet.
0624 What is Being Learned from the System of Rice Intensification: An Agroecological Innovation from Madagascar
WHAT IS BEING LEARNED FROM THE SYSTEM OF RICE INTENSIFICATION (SRI): An Agroecological Innovation from Madagascar Norman Uphoff, CIIFAD Cornell University, USA Plant Protection/IPM Program Hanoi, January 4, 2006
The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is a ‘work in progress’ <ul><li>It is an ‘unprecedented’ innovation </li></ul><ul><li>Raising output by 50-100% or more </li></ul><ul><li>With a reduction in inputs : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Fewer seeds – reduced by 80-90% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Less water – reduced by 25-50% </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>No need to introduce new varieties </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Little or no need for agrochemicals </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lower costs of production -- by ca. 20% </li></ul></ul>
The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) gives ‘more’ from ‘less’ <ul><li>Its requirements include: </li></ul><ul><li>More labor initially, while learning methods – becomes labor-saving </li></ul><ul><li>Good water control for best results </li></ul><ul><li>Access to biomass for compost </li></ul><ul><li>Skill and motivation from farmers </li></ul><ul><li>Crop protection in some cases </li></ul>
Basic Practices: <ul><li>Start with young seedlings – 8-12 days old ( <15 days) to preserve their potential for profuse growth of roots and of tillers </li></ul><ul><li>Seedlings are singly and widely spaced – in a square pattern , quickly and gently </li></ul><ul><li>Apply minimum water – with no standing water in fields; just keep the soil moist </li></ul><ul><li>Weed with a ‘rotating hoe’ to aerate soil while controlling weeds (return to soil) </li></ul><ul><li>Provide organic matter -- as much as possible -- for soil organisms and plants </li></ul>
Adaptations: <ul><li>Direct seeding to reduce labor costs – transplanting is not necessary, only no traumatization of plant roots; can also plant more densely and reduce numbers </li></ul><ul><li>Raised beds and zero-tillage being tried – e.g., SRI rice/mushroom in Sichuan, also can save labor and improve soil </li></ul><ul><li>Upland SRI rice – achieving > 7 t/ha in Philippines, with rainfall only; also good results in West Bengal, India (IWMI) </li></ul><ul><li>Concepts being applied to other crops </li></ul>
SRI Underscores Importance of Management <ul><li>This is no ‘news’ to an IPM program – but it is important to be clear about this in our current ‘genocentric’ period </li></ul><ul><li>Production depends on three ‘pillars’ – </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Genetic potential </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Resource inputs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management matching genome to environment – producing PHENOTYPES </li></ul></ul><ul><li>We eat phenotypes – not genotypes, need to give more attention to managemt </li></ul>
Different Paradigms of Production <ul><li>GREEN REVOLUTION strategy was to: </li></ul><ul><li>(a) Change the genetic potential of plants, and </li></ul><ul><li>(b) Increase the use of external inputs -- more water, fertilizer, insecticides, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>AGROECOLOGY just changes management practices for plants, soil, water and nutrients : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>(a) It promotes the growth of root systems , and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(b) It increases the abundance and diversity of soil organisms – to enlist their benefits </li></ul></ul><ul><li>These effects give better PHENOTYPE </li></ul>
SRI Practices <ul><li>Produce better PHENOTYPES from any rice GENOTYPE </li></ul><ul><li>By modifying the GxE equation (enhance the interaction of plants’ genetic endowment ↔ environment) can get plants that are not only more productive -- but also more resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses , thereby </li></ul><ul><ul><li>reducing farmers’ risks , while also </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>raising farmers’ incomes </li></ul></ul>
Ms. Im Sarim, Cambodia, with rice plant grown from a single seed, using SRI methods and traditional variety -- yield of 6.72 t/ha
<ul><li>Resistance to </li></ul><ul><li>pests and diseases </li></ul><ul><li>Explained by theory of trophobiosis ? (Francis Chaboussou, Healthy Crops: A New Agricultural Revolution -- book published by Jon Carpenter, Charnley, UK, 2004 -- translation of 1985 book) </li></ul>
Trophobiosis <ul><li>Explains incidence of pest and disease in terms of plants’ nutrition : </li></ul><ul><li>Nutrient imbalances and deficiencies lead to excesses of free amino acids not yet synthesized into proteins in the plants’ sap and cells – and more reducing sugars not incorporated into polysaccharides </li></ul><ul><li>This condition attracts and nourishes insects, bacteria, fungi and viruses </li></ul>
Trophobiosis <ul><li>Deserves more attention and empirical evaluation than it has received to date </li></ul><ul><li>Its propositions are well supported by published literature over last 50 years -- and by long-standing observations about adverse effects of nitrogenous fertilizers and chlorinated pesticides </li></ul><ul><li>Theory does not support strictly ‘organic’ approach since nutrient amendments will be beneficial and advisable when natural nutrient shortages exist </li></ul>
Farmer-Centered Strategy <ul><li>Do not just ‘adopt’ what we are suggesting – think about it, make some adjustments and changes , evaluate the results for yourself and for your own conditions (FFS) </li></ul><ul><li>If the new practices are beneficial, share them with other farmers – spread farmer-to-farmer – they are provided to farmers without IPR, in the public domain, no charge </li></ul>
Benefits from This Approach <ul><li>Farmers are contributing to the spread of the innovation – some wonderful examples of this </li></ul><ul><li>Farmers also contribute to improving the innovation – we are seeing many improvements in implements, crop establishment, and other practices </li></ul><ul><li>Farmers are extending SRI concepts and practices to other crops </li></ul>
H. M. Premaratna, Mellawellana, Sri Lanka, who has become spokesperson for SRI in many forums; working for Oxfam
Cono-weeder developed by H. M. Premaratna, Sri Lanka, locally manufactured for $10
Mey Som, the first Cambodian farmer to use SRI; now known as ‘the professor’ for his extensive SRI training efforts
Weeder designed by Nong Sovann, Kampong Spreu province, Cambodia; built for $3, with a $20 increase in value of rice
Vietnamese women who have trained 1,000 farmers (on 300 ha) in SRI methods to accomplish potential water saving possible
Four-row weeder developed by Gopal Swaminathan, Cauvery Delta, Tamil Nadu, India; who also devised the Kadiramangalam version of SRI for production in high-temperature regions
Kadiramangalam System <ul><li>Transplant young seedlings at 15 days in hills of 5 plants each </li></ul><ul><li>Transplant again at 30 days putting single seedlings at 30x30 cm spacing </li></ul><ul><li>This ‘hardens’ seedlings for the intense heat and sun of Cauvery delta </li></ul><ul><li>G. Swaminathan has also used SRI methods for cotton seedlings </li></ul>
Cotton seedlings planted in cups, 1 cup of hybrid seed = 1 acre At 10 days, bottom of cup is removed; seedlings are planted at 2 x 4 foot spacing Yield is 20% more, with less weed problems and reduced watering
S. Ariyaratne Direct-Seeding <ul><li>Broadcast 10-day-old seedlings into muddy paddy field @ 25 kg seed/ha </li></ul><ul><li>Then at 10 days after transplanting, ‘weed’ the field as if planted with 25x25 cm spacing </li></ul><ul><li>This thins crop as if transplanted sparsely; saves labor for nursery and transplanting </li></ul><ul><li>Yield of 7.5 t/ha assured, acc. to S.A. </li></ul>
Roller-marker devised by Lakshmana Reddy, East Godavari, AP, India, to save time in transplanting operations; Reddy’s yield in 2003-04 rabi season was 17.25 t/ha paddy (dry wt)
Liu Zhibin, Meishan Inst. of Science & Technology, China, in raised-bed, no-till SRI field with certified yield of 13.4 t/ha; in 2001, his first SRI yield was 16 t/ha, setting a new record
Nie Fu-Qiu, Bu Tou village, Tian Tai, Zhejiang province, who got record yield of 12.1 t/ha with SRI in 2004; next year, even though 3 typhoons hit his area, his SRI crop did not lodge, and it produced 11.38 t/ha (with a 93.4% seed-set rate)
Results of Direct Seeding, by Machine and by Hand (t/ha) 10.1 11.1 No-Till 10.1 11.3 Standard D.S. by hand D.S. by machine TILLAGE Method Used
Seeder Developed in Cuba Direct seeding will probably replace transplanting in future; SRI seeks to avoid trauma to the young roots ; TP not needed
Farmers Extend SRI to Other Crops <ul><li>Winter wheat in Poland </li></ul><ul><li>Finger millet (ragi) in India (Karnataka state) </li></ul><ul><li>Sugar cane in India (Andhra Pradesh state) </li></ul><ul><li>Cotton in India (Tamil Nadu state) </li></ul><ul><li>Chickens in Cambodia? </li></ul>
Increase in Finger Millet Yield with Guli Vidhana Method, as reported by Green Foundation, Bangalore Methods: Broadcast - Drill sowing - Close transplant - Guli Vidhana
SRI RAGI (FINGER MILLET), Rabi 2004-05 60 days after sowing – Varieties 762 and 708 VR 762 VR 708 10 15 21* *Age at which seedlings were transplanted from nursery Results of trials being being done by ANGRAU
Sugar Cane Adaptation <ul><li>Andhra Pradesh State, India: Farmer adaptation based on SRI experience: </li></ul><ul><li>Instead of planting 8-12” sets in rows 3’ apart -- incubate 3” sets (with one bud each) in plastic bags and compost, in warm, humid environment for 45 days; plant 1’ apart in rows 5-6’ apart -- reduce material by 85% </li></ul><ul><li>Save cost of 3 irrigations and 1 herbicide </li></ul><ul><li>Yield is 100 tons/acre instead of 30 tons </li></ul>
Application to Chicken Rearing <ul><li>Farmers in the village of Pak Bang Oeun, Cambodia (slide 7) have learned the value of compost </li></ul><ul><li>All families maintain their own compost pile, which they fence </li></ul><ul><li>They got the idea of rearing their chickens inside the fence </li></ul><ul><li>They get more eggs and meat from fewer chickens by better managemt </li></ul>
Farmer Innovation is Added Benefit <ul><li>SRI offers many advantages for poor households and for the environment </li></ul><ul><li>Methodologies for dissemination are important for speed and spread </li></ul><ul><li>Variety of institutional channels can succeed; combinations are best </li></ul><ul><li>SRI is expected to ‘improve the mind’ -- as suggested by the name of ATS </li></ul><ul><li>Participatory methods also improve the innovation and the farming community </li></ul>
Nepal: Monsoon Season, 2004 <ul><li>22 farmers in Morang district reporting on SRI vs. conventional results: </li></ul><ul><li>Average conventional yield: 3.37 t/ha </li></ul><ul><li>Average SRI yield: 7.85 t/ha </li></ul><ul><li>Average earlier harvest </li></ul><ul><li>for the SRI crop: 15.1 days </li></ul><ul><li>Andhra Pradesh (India): ~ 8.5 days earlier </li></ul><ul><li>Cambodia: ~ 7 days earlier </li></ul>
<ul><li>Higher milling out-turn </li></ul><ul><li>as a result of </li></ul><ul><li>Less chaff (fewer unfilled grains) </li></ul><ul><li>Less shattering (fewer broken grains) </li></ul><ul><li>Get more milled rice from raw paddy </li></ul><ul><li>Other quality improvements too? </li></ul><ul><li>Better nutritional quality of grain? </li></ul>
MEASURED DIFFERENCES IN GRAIN QUALITY Characteristic SRI (3 spacings) Conventional Diff. Paper by Prof. Ma Jun, Sichuan Agricultural University, presented at 10th conference on Theory and Practice for High-Quality, High-Yielding Rice in China, Haerbin, 8/2004 + 17.5 38.87 - 39.99 41.81 - 50.84 Head milled rice (%) + 16.1 41.54 - 51.46 53.58 - 54.41 Milled rice outturn (%) - 65.7 6.74 - 7.17 1.02 - 4.04 General chalkiness (%) - 30.7 39.89 - 41.07 23.62 - 32.47 Chalky kernels (%)
LESS CAN PRODUCE MORE <ul><li>by utilizing biological potentials & processes </li></ul><ul><li>Smaller, younger rice seedlings become larger, more productive mature plants </li></ul><ul><li>Fewer rice plants per hill and per m 2 give higher yield if used with other SRI practices </li></ul><ul><li>Half as much water produces more rice because aerobic soil conditions are better </li></ul><ul><li>Greater output is possible with use of </li></ul><ul><li>fewer or even no external/chemical inputs </li></ul><ul><li>Even more output within a shorter time </li></ul><ul><li>There is nothing magical about SRI – not ‘voodoo science’ (Cassman & Sinclair, 2004) </li></ul>
Table 1. Summary of results from SRI vs. BMP evaluations in China and India, t ha -1 , 2003-2004 * Chinese comparisons were made using hybrid rice varieties. 1.57 (27.7%) 7.23 5.66 100 trials (SRI and BMP trials each 0.1 ha) Tamil Nadu state 2.42 (33.8%) 8.73 6.31 1,525 trials (average 0.4 ha; range 0.1-1.6 ha) Andhra Pradesh state 3.31* (40.7%) 11.44* 8.13* 8 trials (0.2 ha each) Sichuan province 3.1* (35.2%) 11.9* 8.8* 16.8 ha of SRI rice with 2 hybrid varieties Zhejiang province SRI advantage (% incr.) SRI ave. yield BMP ave. yield No. of on-farm comparison trials (area) Province/state
THANK YOU <ul><li>Web page: http://ciifad.cornell.edu/sri/ </li></ul><ul><li>Email: [email_address] or [email_address] or </li></ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul>