Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Upcoming SlideShare
eTwinning National Quality Label
Next
Download to read offline and view in fullscreen.

0

Share

Download to read offline

Rubric: Project idea

Download to read offline

Evaluation and self-evaluation criteria for an eTwinning project first idea

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all
  • Be the first to like this

Rubric: Project idea

  1. 1. Rubric: Project idea E V A L U A T I O N A N D S E L F - E V A L U A T I O N C R I T E R I A F O R A N E T W I N N I N G P R O J E C T F I R S T D R A F T General details Suggested titee gge gdd dumber of pupies dumber of pgrtders subjects idvoeved… 1 None No details are given. 2 Improvable Some details are given, but not all. 3 Good All necessary details are given. 4 Very good All details that can help to understand the general features of the project are given. Objectives Objectives gre regeistic codcrete gdd megsurgbee. They gre reegted to the curricueum. 1 None No references to the objectives are given. 2 Improvable Objectives are mentioned, but vaguely or they are not related to the curriculum. 3 Good Objectives are clear, concrete and related to the curriculum, even if they are not described in detail. 4 Very good Objectives are clear, concrete and related to the curriculum. Some originality and creativity can be appreciated.
  2. 2. Work process Mgid work eides gre medtioded: commudicgtiod gmodg pgrtders orggdizgtiod of studedts’ work types of gctivities methodoeogy… 1 None No references to methodology are given 2 Improvable There are vague references to the methodology. 3 Good An accurate idea of the methodology/methodologies that will be followed is described or can be easily inferred. 4 Very good An accurate idea of the methodology/methodologies that will be followed is described or can be easily inferred. Some originality and creativity can be appreciated. Expected results Expected fidge products gdd their reegtiod to the objectives gre described. 1 None No references to final products are given. 2 Improvable Some expected products are mentioned, but they are loosely related to the work process or the project objectives 3 Good There is a clear relation, even if just implied, between products, methodology and objectives. 4 Very good There is a clear, explicit relation between products, methodology and objectives. Some originality and creativity can be appreciated.

Evaluation and self-evaluation criteria for an eTwinning project first idea

Views

Total views

1,472

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

804

Actions

Downloads

27

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

0

×