Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Presentation, SIGMA Workshop on PPP characteristics, models & sectors, Turkey, 11-12 April 2018

233 views

Published on

Presentation of the “SIGMA Workshop on PPP characteristics, models & sectors”, held in Ankara on 11-12 April 2018. Presentation made by Mr. Mario Turkovic, SIGMA.

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
  • Be the first to comment

Presentation, SIGMA Workshop on PPP characteristics, models & sectors, Turkey, 11-12 April 2018

  1. 1. © OECD PPP characteristics, models and sectors Mario Turković OECD/SIGMA Ankara 11/12 April 2018
  2. 2. Structure 1. PPP – term and definition 2. Main PPP features 3. PPP models and sectors 4. Typical PPP structure 5. PPP (dis)advantages
  3. 3. Definition Classic public contracts PPPs Concessions Management Contracts Joint Ventures Part-Privatization DBF BOT PFI DBFM Privatization More private – less public control Source: IFS / PWC
  4. 4. Public-Private Partnership is a contractual agreement between PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP Owner of assets and service provider Skills, experience and finance Co-operation and risk sharing Definition
  5. 5.  Public sector gives a right to a private sector to exploit public assets and/or right to provide a certain service that is under usual competences of public sector.  More than one obligation is passed to private sector - to design, finance, built, operate and maintain and/or to provide the (public) service to the end users.  Long term contract - provision of a new or existing service over a pre-determined time (often a longer period of time – 20 to 30 years - than is customary in public contracts) - whole life costs of a project (!) Definition
  6. 6. Definition  Payment of a periodic charge to the private partner by a public entity and/or, possibly, payments by the public directly as user if the PPP is a works/services concession.  No obligation of the public entity to pay until the asset is being used in the provision of the service  The scope, price, quality, time scale, means of service delivery etc. are regulated by the public entity  All risks been indentified and allocated between partners - risk share is crucial
  7. 7. Definition Risks share PUBLIC PARTNER Risk undertaking Permits Institutional framework (taxes, city planning etc.) Political Risks PRIVATE PARTNER Risk transferRisk Transfer / Undertaking Design Construction Operation Financing Technology Inflation demand (use / volume) force majeure facts Source: IFS / PWC
  8. 8. Definition On the EU level:  It is used as an “umbrella” term that describes only a specific situation when public authorities and private entities cooperate in order to meet a general interest (NO directive on PPP)  PPP is being addressed by communications  In legal terms it can be either a public (work or service) contract or a (work and service) concession, depending on the case (EU directives 2014/23, 24 and 25)  In both cases MS has to follow EU rules in private partner selection procedure
  9. 9. Key features 1.Technical: • output, not input specifications • whole life approach to design, build and operation • defined standards of services • payments related to service delivery – payment mechanism 2. Financial: • private sector funding (equity + loan) • project financing structure (SPV) • risks identification, calculation and allocation • PSC calculations – WfM test
  10. 10. Key features 3. Legal: • complex tender documentation and PP procedure • complex PPP (and other) contracts • monitoring of implementation 4. Other: • strategic approach – political (and public) support • flexibility during implementation • off balance sheet treatment of projects
  11. 11. Models and sectors Taking into account how private partner makes a return of its investment) : 1. Availability based projects (PFI): public partner pays availability fee to the private partner under certain conditions. 2. Service based projects (BOT, “concession” type): private partner gets renumerated by the end users payments (“free standing PPPs”). 3. Mixed PPPs (combination of two mentioned models)
  12. 12. Models and sectors PPP in terms of EU Directives  Availability based PPP projects legally realized as public contracts for works/services in the sense of Directives 2014/24/EU (Public Sector Directive) or 2014/25/EU (Utilities Directive)  Demand based PPP projects legally realized as concessions for works/services in the sense of Directive 2014/23/EU (Concessions Directive) PPP contracts, therefore, in the sense of the EU Directives could be (subject to the applicable PPP definition) either public (works/services) contracts or concessions (for works/services). 11
  13. 13. Models and sectors Concessions In the sense of Directive 2014/23/EU ‘Concessions Directive’): • A works concession is a contract of the same type as a public works contract except for the fact that the consideration for the works to be carried out consists either solely in the right to exploit the works or in this right together with payment. • A service concession is a contract of the same type as a public service contract except for the fact that the consideration for the provision of services consists either solely in the right to exploit the service or in this right together with payment. 12
  14. 14. Models and sectors Concessions Transfer of an operating risk is a core element of concessions: “The award of a works or services concession shall involve the transfer to the concessionaire of an operating risk in exploiting those works or services encompassing demand or supply risk or both. The concessionaire shall be deemed to assume operating risk where, under normal operating conditions, it is not guaranteed to recoup the investments made or the costs incurred in operating the works or the services which are the subject-matter of the concession. The part of the risk transferred to the concessionaire shall involve real exposure to the vagaries of the market, such that any potential estimated loss incurred by the concessionaire shall not be merely nominal or negligible” 13
  15. 15. Models and sectors Taking into account the structure of private partner participation into the project) : 1. Contractual model (the most common): private partner creates a SPV and all obligations between public and private partner are regulated within the contract between public partner and SPV 2. Institutionalized model: Public and private partner creates a joint company that is responsible for delivery of a project. Private partner has to participate actively in project implementation (it is not enough that private partner only participates via its financial contribution).
  16. 16. Models and sectors Taking into account the legal nature of contract: 1. Public (works or services ) contract 2. Concession (works or services ) contracts Taking into account the nature of infrastructure: 1. Social infrastructure PPP projects 2. Economic infrastructure PPP projects
  17. 17. Models and sectors PPPs are being used in following sectors: • water supply/wastewater treatment, • solid waste management, • energy, • telecommunications, • transportation (rail, metro, roads, traffic management, ports), • urban development (including social housing), • schools, hospitals/health care, • office accommodation, leisure facilities, • defense, • street lighting, • IT services, • criminal justice (prisons, courts), etc
  18. 18. PPP Structure Construction Contractor Maintenance Contractor Project Funding Soft FM Contractor Maintenance Contract Construction Contract “Soft FM” Contract (e.g. cleaning, catering, security) Project contract Sub-Contracts Funders Public AuthoritySponsors Project Company (SPV) User services Fees / tolls (if PPP is a concession) Project- Finance DebtEquity Availability payments / “shadow-tolls (if PPP is a PFI)
  19. 19. PPP Structure  Public entity awards contract to private sector partner  Private sector partner creates an ad hoc company (Special Purpose Vehicle) to operate the contract  The partner finances the transaction by its own equity and also borrowing the majority of funds from third party sources (off balance sheet)  The SPV sub-contracts the construction and maintenance of asset and operation of the service  The private partner’s fee is paid either by the users or by public entity through periodic (availability) payments  The private sector partner uses this income to repay its loan and pay dividends to its shareholders
  20. 20. Advantages Financing of more projects without impact on the public finances Financing projects which can’t be done through publicly funded capital program Continuity in capital investment Potential for improved services, lower costs, improved income collection – better value for money Promotion of the development of the national economy as well of the employment rate through the encouragement of private investments
  21. 21. Disadvantages  Cost of preparation and procurement (transaction costs)  Cost of termination and role of lenders  Loss of service delivery capability  Paying for specific riskss  Negative public image
  22. 22. Summary PPPs are complex, long term, high value transactions which deliver public infrastructure through procuring services rather than capital assets.  Public sector defines service requirement  Private sector designs, finances, builds, operates the asset  Full or partial financing of the projects by the private sector  providing effective risk allocation between the partners  aiming to deliver better value for money PPPs can be successful tool, BUT it is important to have strong political support, to set up appropriate legal and institutional frame and to strengthen the public sector capability in preparation and implementation of PPPs

×