Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Implementation of effective remedies in public
procurement of Ukraine.
Institutional framework of the Complaints Review
Au...
Complaints and appeals system
• Request to remove infringements occurring during procurement
procedures are directly submi...
• Complainer (bidder who believes that the contracting authority has
violated rules of the procurement procedure) can chos...
Why was AMCU chosen as the
Complaints Review Authority ?
• Necessary separation of regulatory and control functions in
pub...
International commitments
• AMCU status within Ukrainian government system is in line
with EU Remedies Directive 89/…. and...
Institutional framework of the
Complaints Review Authority
• The functions of complaints review for public procurement wer...
Principles of the Complaints
Review Authority
• independence;
• openness;
• publicity;
• Decisions can be appealed only wi...
15 Implementation of Effective Remedies in Public Procurement in Ukraine_English
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

15 Implementation of Effective Remedies in Public Procurement in Ukraine_English

214 views

Published on

ENI East Regional Conference Public Procurement Complaints Review Agency English

Published in: Travel, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

15 Implementation of Effective Remedies in Public Procurement in Ukraine_English

  1. 1. Implementation of effective remedies in public procurement of Ukraine. Institutional framework of the Complaints Review Authority Paris, April 2014
  2. 2. Complaints and appeals system • Request to remove infringements occurring during procurement procedures are directly submitted to the contracting authority; • Complaint is submitted to the Complaints Review Authority ; • Claim is filed with a court.
  3. 3. • Complainer (bidder who believes that the contracting authority has violated rules of the procurement procedure) can chose any of the remedies or a combination thereof; • The law does not prescribe a mandatory sequence for remedy application
  4. 4. Why was AMCU chosen as the Complaints Review Authority ? • Necessary separation of regulatory and control functions in public procurement; • Public agency with a special status; • Special procedures for appointment and dismissal of the AMCU Chairman and Government Commissioners; • The Committee reports to the Parliament of Ukraine; • Special working relations with the Cabinet; • Special procedural framework for the Committee’s operations
  5. 5. International commitments • AMCU status within Ukrainian government system is in line with EU Remedies Directive 89/…. and EU-Ukraine FTA; • Complaints and appeals regulations of the Law of Ukraine «On Public Procurement» fully comply with the relevant EU Directives; • Article 2, EU Remedies Directive 89/…., requires the right to award damages to persons harmed by an infringement of public procurement laws; • Further amendments of Article 18 of the Law are only related to the Committee’s practice and are largely editorial
  6. 6. Institutional framework of the Complaints Review Authority • The functions of complaints review for public procurement were vested with the Anti- Monopoly Committee of Ukraine when the Law “On Public Procurement” took effect on 30.06.2010; • The Committee has set up a Permanent Administrative Board for Review of Complaints on Public Procurement Infringements (hereinafter the Board); • The Board consists of three Government Commissioners; • The Chairman of the Board must have a degree in law; • The Board is regulated by the law of Ukraine “On Anti-Monopoly Committee of Ukraine” unless otherwise established by the Law of Ukraine “On Public Procurement”; • The Board’s decisions are made on behalf of AMCU.
  7. 7. Principles of the Complaints Review Authority • independence; • openness; • publicity; • Decisions can be appealed only with the court; • Objective and unbiased approach

×