Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Dr fuster's slides part i

114 views

Published on

SHAPE Society

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Dr fuster's slides part i

  1. 1. THE EPIDEMIC OF CVD – NEED FOR NEW APPROACHES Epidemiology and Change in Emphasis - From the High Risk Plaque to the High Risk Symptomatic Patient - From the High Risk Asymptomati to the Intermediate and Low Risk Patient HRSP - Therapeutic Polypill & Single Pill HRAP - BAD, Diagnostic MR Imaging - BAD, Diagnostic & Rx - MR Plaque Composition - BAD, Diagnostic Molecular MR Contrast Enhanced, IRAP - Diagnostic CACS & CRP Biomarkers LRAP - Government, Polymeal, Children SHAPE & AEHA. Orlando, March 05, 2005
  2. 2. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 1990 2020 MillionsofDeaths fromCardiovascularCauses Western countries Non-Western (developing) countries 5 9 6 19 DEATHS FROM CARDIOVASCULAR CAUSES, WORLDWIDE, IN 1990 AND ESTIMATED FOR 2020 KS Reddy. NEJM 2004; 350:2438
  3. 3. Prevalence of Obesity & Diabetes in the U.S. 1990/19911990/1991 20002000 ejt 0901–120 Mokdad et al., JAMA 286:1195–1200, 2001Mokdad et al., JAMA 286:1195–1200, 2001 No DataNo Data < 4%< 4% 4%-6%4%-6% > 6%> 6% No DataNo Data < 10%< 10% 10%-14%10%-14% 15%-19%15%-19% ≥≥ 20%20% ObesityObesity DiabetesDiabetes
  4. 4. 0 10 20 30 40 50 Hypertri- glycerinemia Low HDL Hyper- glycemia Central Obesity Male Female Prevalence(%) Hyper- tension METABOLIC ABNORMALITIES AMERICAN ADOLESCENTS (12-19 Y)1 1 NHANES III - n=1960 S.D.de Ferranti et al., Circ 2004; 110:2494
  5. 5. THE EPIDEMIC OF CVD – NEED FOR NEW APPROACHES Epidemiology and Change in Emphasis - From the High Risk Plaque to the High Risk Symptomatic Patient - From the High Risk Asymptomati to the Intermediate and Low Risk Patient HRSP - Therapeutic Polypill & Single Pill HRAP - BAD, Diagnostic MR Imaging - BAD, Diagnostic & Rx - MR Plaque Composition - BAD, Diagnostic Molecular MR Contrast Enhanced, IRAP - Diagnostic CACS & CRP Biomarkers LRAP - Government, Polymeal, Children SHAPE & AEHA. Within This Context Orlando, March 05, 2005
  6. 6. ATHEROTHROMBOSIS: APPROACH IN 2005 Aggressive Intervention3 Effective Prevention1 2.Chronic Atherothrombosis 2. CAD Equivalents HRAP- Subclinical MRI / CT Low Risk Modified from V Fuster, Circulation 1999; 99:1132 IRAP – Risk Frs CACS / CRP 1.Acute Coronary Syndromes Early Detection 2 HRAP: High Risk Asymptomatic Patient - >2% y - >20% 10y IRAP: Intermediate Risk Asymptomatic Patient – 0.5-2% y - 5-20% 10y LOW RISK: FRS - < 0.5%y - < 5% 10 y
  7. 7. METHODS TO ASSESS PLAQUE VULNERABILITY Intravascular ultrasound Three-dimensional reconstruction Ultrasound elastography Intravascular ultrasound flow measurements Virtual histology Angiography Direct visualization Optical coherence tomography RAMAN (near infrared) spectroscopy Thermography Computed tomography Contrast Ultrafast Magnetic Resonance Phase Contrast Nuclear Intravascular B Meier. Heart 2004; 90:1395
  8. 8. HIGH RISK PLAQUES - HRP HIGH RISK BLOOD - HRB BURDEN OF ATHEROTHROMBOSIS DISEASE - BAD a) HRP / HRB / BAD - Systemic b) HRP – Abundant c) HRP AND HRB – Regionally Different Maseri A, Fuster V, Circulation 2003; 107: 2068 Fuster V, Kim RJ, Circulation 2005 (In Press)
  9. 9. ACS (N=198) & SYSTEMIC ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION (FBF) – 5 DAYS 1 ADJUSTED RISK FACTORS, CV EVENTS (DEATH, MI, STROKE)- Av 4 YRS Fichtlscherer et al., Circ 2004; 110:1926 (Frankfurt) 70 80 90 100 0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 days of follow up Proportionofpatients withouCVevents(%) Logrank test p<0.03 Acetylcholine - dose - response 70 80 90 100 0 365 730 1095 1460 1825 days of follow up Proportionofpatients withouCVevents(%) Logrank test p<0.08 Sodium nitroprusside - dose - response ≥ 35.0 (1. quartile) < 34.9 (2. quartile) < 24.3 (3. quartile) < 15.6 (4. quartile) ≥ 31.6 (1. quartile) < 31.5 (2. quartile) < 18.7 (4. quartile) < 24.1 (3. quartile) 1 Improved response at 8 weeks adds to the prediction (ACH)
  10. 10. CAD (ACS 54%) - CULPRIT VESSEL / LESION – N=843 NON-STENOTIC YELLOW PLAQUES / THROMBUS – N=1253 0 20 40 60 80 100 1 2 3 Color Grade of Plaque PrevalenceofThrombosis * † ‡ (%) *P=.0003 vs grade 1. †P<.0001 vs grade 1. ‡P<.0001 vs grade 2 Y Ueda et al., AHJ 2004; 148:842 (Osaka)
  11. 11. CAROTID ACTIVE PLAQUES (ENDARTERECTOMY) CAP RUPTURE AND CAP EROSION BY STUDY GROUP ICTB (LG Spagnoli et al.) JAMA 2004; 292:1895 (Rome, Mineapolis, Mayo) C Yuan et al Circ 2002;105:181 (Seattle) – MRI – Several Plaques No. of Plaques (%) P Val Ipsilat. Stroke With TIA Asymptom. Stroke vs Stroke vs TIA vs (n=96) (n=91) (n=82) TIA Asympt. Asympt. Thromb. active % 74.0 35.2 14.6 <.001 <.001 .002 Cap rupture 66.7 23.1 13.4 <.001 <.001 .004 Cap erosion 7.3 12.1 1.2 .51 .09 .03
  12. 12. THE EPIDEMIC OF CVD – NEED FOR NEW APPROACHES Epidemiology and Change in Emphasis - From the High Risk Plaque to the High Risk Symptomatic Patient - From the High Risk Asymptomatic to the Intermediate and Low Risk Patient HRSP - Therapeutic Polypill & Single Pill HRAP - BAD, Diagnostic MR Imaging - BAD, Diagnostic & Rx - MR Plaque Composition - BAD, Diagnostic Molecular MR Contrast Enhanced, IRAP - Diagnostic CACS & CRP Biomarkers LRAP - Government, Polymeal, Children SHAPE & AEHA. Orlando, March 05, 2005
  13. 13. ATHEROTHROMBOSIS: APPROACH IN 2005 Aggressive Intervention3 Effective Prevention1 Chronic Atherothrombosis CHD Equivalents HRAP- Subclinical CT / MRI Low Risk Modified from V Fuster, Circulation 1999; 99:1132 IRAP – Risk Frs CACS / CRP Acute Coronary Syndromes Early Detection 2 HRAP: High Risk Asymptomatic Patient - >2% y - >20% 10y IRAP: Intermediate Risk Asymptomatic Patient – 0.5-2% y - 5-20% 10y LOW RISK: FRS - < 0.5%y - < 5% 10 y
  14. 14. THE EPIDEMIC OF CVD – NEED FOR NEW APPROACHES Epidemiology and Change in Emphasis - From the High Risk Plaque to the High Risk Symptomatic Patient - From the High Risk Asymptomati to the Intermediate and Low Risk Patient HRSP - Therapeutic Polypill & Single Pill HRAP - BAD, Diagnostic MR Imaging - BAD, Diagnostic & Rx - MR Plaque Composition - BAD, Diagnostic Molecular MR Contrast Enhanced, IRAP - Diagnostic CACS & CRP Biomarkers LRAP - Government, Polymeal, Children SHAPE & AEHA. Orlando, March 05, 2005
  15. 15. ATHEROTHROMBOSIS: APPROACH IN 2005 Aggressive Intervention3 Effective Prevention1 2.Chronic Atherothrombosis 2. CAD Equivalents HRAP- Subclinical MRI / CT Low Risk Modified from V Fuster, Circulation 1999; 99:1132 IRAP – Risk Frs CACS / CRP 1.Acute Coronary Syndromes Early Detection 2 HRAP: High Risk Asymptomatic Patient - >2% y - >20% 10y IRAP: Intermediate Risk Asymptomatic Patient – 0.5-2% y - 5-20% 10y LOW RISK: FRS - < 0.5%y - < 5% 10 y
  16. 16. x Patient Transport In-hospital Reperfusion 2004 2014 0 1 2 3 A B C D Hours Methods of Speeding Time to Reperfusion: A B C D Media Campaign 911 Expansion Regionalization PCI-Eluted Stents Patient Education Pre-hosp. Rx MI protocol New devices / demand 1. MI - TIME TO REPERFUSION – 2005, 2015 X New antithrombotics, Myoc-Imaging., AICD, RF modification x X
  17. 17. 1. ACS – A PRE-HOSPITAL POLYPILL V Fuster 2005 Definite ACS with Possible ACS Definite ACS High risk/intervention Tx R Bl. Tx R Bl. Tx R Bl + + Clopidogrel - Like Clopidogrel - Like + + Oral Fr Xa Inhib Oral Fr Xa Inhib + + Statin Statin + Oral Antithrombin
  18. 18. 2. CAD EQUIVALENTS, CHRONIC ATHEROTHROMBOSIS AND A POLYPILL • ASA • CLOPIDOGREL • STATINS / LDL- C (HDL- C) • ACE INHIBITORS • BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION • INTERVENTION (PCI VS CABG): LIFE QUALITY VS QUANTITY CHALLENGES: COMPLIANCE, COSTS
  19. 19. THE EPIDEMIC OF CVD – NEED FOR NEW APPROACHES Epidemiology and Change in Emphasis - From the High Risk Plaque to the High Risk Symptomatic Patient - From the High Risk Asymptomati to the Intermediate and Low Risk Patient HRSP - Therapeutic Polypill & Single Pill HRAP - BAD, Diagnostic MR Imaging - BAD, Diagnostic & Rx - MR Plaque Composition - BAD, Diagnostic Molecular MR Contrast Enhanced, IRAP - Diagnostic CACS & CRP Biomarkers LRAP - Government, Polymeal, Children SHAPE & AEHA. Orlando, March 05, 2005
  20. 20. ATHEROTHROMBOSIS: APPROACH IN 2005 Aggressive Intervention3 Effective Prevention1 Chronic Atherothrombosis CHD Equivalents HRAP- Subclinical CT / MRI Low Risk Modified from V Fuster, Circulation 1999; 99:1132 IRAP – Risk Frs CACS / CRP Acute Coronary Syndromes Early Detection 2 HRAP: High Risk Asymptomatic Patient - >2% y - >20% 10y IRAP: Intermediate Risk Asymptomatic Patient – 0.5-2% y - 5-20% 10y LOW RISK: FRS - < 0.5%y - < 5% 10 y
  21. 21. CHD RISK IN WOMEN - FRAMINGHAM SCORING (FRS) - 10 y Age, y HDL cholesterol < 35 -9 ≥ 60 -3 35-39 -4 50-59 0 40-44 0 45-49 1 45-49 3 35-44 2 50-54 6 < 35 5 55-59 7 Syst BP 60-64 8 < 120 -3 65-69 8 120-129 0 70-74 8 130-139 1 Cholesterol 140-149 2 < 160 -2 > 160 3 169-199 0 Diabetes 200-239 1 No 0 240-279 2 Yes 4 ≥ 280 3 Smoking No 0 Yes 2 Points 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >14 Total CHD (%) 2 3 4 5 7 8 10 13 16 20 25 31 37 45 > 53 Hard CHD (%) 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 13 16 20 25 30 35 > 45 Grundy SM, Pasternak R, Greenland P, Smith S, Fuster V, Circ 1999; 100:1481 ATP III - Aggressive Rx: Framingham, Diabetes, Metab. Synd: obese, BP, HDL, TC, Gluc - Physical inactivity JAMA 2001; 285:2475
  22. 22. Longitudinal View Ca++ BAD (Fayad ZA, Mani V, Fuster V et al.) 2005 Multi Slice Black Blood Imaging Rapid Extended Coverage (REX) Turbo Spin Echo Technique Mid heart Aorta- 12 slices
  23. 23. Descriptive StatisticsParameter No Mean St dev Min Max Range Age 100 54.3 20.55 9 87 78 Framingham Score 44 7.27 3.99 1 20 19 10-Year Risk 42 0.118 0.069 0.03 0.31 0.28 Total Chol 84 199.9 57.3 105 366 261 LDL 83 120.7 54.5 46 303 257 HDL 84 53.2 16.8 20 100 80 TGC 83 139.3 122.9 32 891 859 HbA1C 20 6.75 1.57 4.7 10.9 6.2 BMI 82 25.98 5.2 15.1 42.5 27.3 BSA (m2 ) 80 1.89 0.30 1.13 2.85 1.72 BAD (Fayad ZA, Mani V, Fuster V et al.) 2005
  24. 24. Comparing Framingham Risk Factor Score and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 NO YES CAD FraminghamScore p = 0.447 BAD (Fayad ZA, Mani V, Fuster V et al.) 2005
  25. 25. Comparing Wall Area (mm2 ) and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Wall Area Aorta - CAD 100 150 200 250 300 NO YES CAD WADA p < 0.001 * BAD (Fayad ZA, Mani V, Fuster V et al.) 2005
  26. 26. CAD (N=167) – STATIN vs NIACIN / STATIN CIMT -0.01 0 0.01 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 Placebo PlaceboER Niacin ER Niacin No DM / MS DM / MS Present ChangeinCIMT(mm±SEM) ARBITER 2 (AJ Taylor et al.) Circ 2004; 110:3510
  27. 27. THE FREEDOM TRIAL FUTURE REVASCULARIZATION EVALUATION IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS: OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF MULTIVESSEL DISEASE Risk Factor modification and Rx are critical. 1) BAD-MRI: Diabetics vs Non Diabetics NHLBI 2005 (PI V Fuster)
  28. 28. THE EPIDEMIC OF CVD – NEED FOR NEW APPROACHES Epidemiology and Change in Emphasis - From the High Risk Plaque to the High Risk Symptomatic Patient - From the High Risk Asymptomati to the Intermediate and Low Risk Patient HRSP - Therapeutic Polypill & Single Pill HRAP - BAD, Diagnostic MR Imaging - BAD, Diagnostic & Rx - MR Plaque Composition - BAD, Diagnostic Molecular MR Contrast Enhanced, IRAP - Diagnostic CACS & CRP Biomarkers LRAP - Government, Polymeal, Children SHAPE & AEHA. Orlando, March 05, 2005
  29. 29. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 MRI (1st) Histology Percent 66.3 64 23.7 5.1 5 20.3 6.3 9.4 CAROTID PLAQUE COMPOSITION (AS PERCENTAGE OF THE WALL) Fibrous Tissue Lipid Necrotic Core Loose Matrix Calcification T Saam et al., ATVB 2005; 25:234 – In Vivo (Seattle, Wash) M Shinnar et al., ATVB 1999; 19:2756 - Ex Vivo (New York)
  30. 30. MRI (no fat sat) MRI (fat sat) LAD Lumen LV RV RVOT LAD WallX-ray angiogram LAD ~6 mm max wall thickness Fayad ZA et al. Circ. 2000;102;506-510 Eccentric (“lipid-rich”) MRI - Plaque Composition
  31. 31. Baseline 24 months follow up R Corti, J J Wentzel, Z A Fayad, J J Badimon, V Fuster 2005 (Subm) A ) MRI-LIPID LOWERING (SIMVASTATIN 20 or 80 mg/d) AND REGRESSION OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS R Corti, ZA Fayad, V Fuster, et al. Circ. 2001;104:249-252 R Corti, V Fuster, ZA Fayad, JJ Badimon et al. Circ 2002;106:2884
  32. 32. Independent of dose, LDL-C < 100 mg/dl had more regresion Corti, J J Wentzel, Z A Fayad, J J Badimon, V Fuster 2005 (Subm)
  33. 33. R Corti, J J Wentzel, Z A Fayad, J J Badimon, V Fuster 2005 (Subm) PROVE IT - TIMI 22 (C Cannon et al.), NEJM 2004; 350:15 - Clinical
  34. 34. Abdominal Aorta Thoracic Aorta Baseline MRI Repeat MRI after 12 months treatment 3 contiguous slice (no interslice gap Lower corner of Th9 Upper corner of L4 Total vascular area Lumen area Maximal vessel wall thickness Minimal vessel wall thickness Yonemura A; Momiyama Y; Fayad ZA et al. JACC 2005;45:733-42 MRI - ATHEROSCLEROSIS AORTA – ATORVASTATIN (12mo,N=40)
  35. 35. -60 - 40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 ΔVWA Thoracic Aorta Abdominal Aorta(%) -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 ΔLDL-C (%) r=0.64 P<0.001 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 ΔLDL-C (%) -60 - 40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 ΔVWA (%) r=0.34 P<0.005 5-mg dose 20-mg dose Yonemura A; Momiyama Y; Fayad ZA et al. JACC 2005;45:733-42 MRI - ATHEROSCLEROSIS AORTA – ATORVASTATIN (12mo,N=40)
  36. 36. Baseline 12 months A) B) LDL-C(mg/dl) VWA(mm C) D) 316 ↓ 195 -38% 161 ↓ 107 -34% 110 ↓ 79 -28% 224 ↓ 202 -10% 20 mg/day 5 mg/day 230 ↓ 180 -20% 212 ↓ 130 -39% 95 ↓ 109 +15% 119 ↓ 129 +9% 20 mg/day 5 mg/day Yonemura A; Momiyama Y; Fayad ZA et al. JACC 2005;45:733-42
  37. 37. B) MRI - HDL-Cholesterol Rabbit / IV HDL, Apo E / HDL, Rabbit / PPAR-y / Fenofibrate 1 10 J.X. Rong et al. Circ 2001;104:2447 High-chol. Diet Simv. + PPAR-y Badimon JJ, Badimon L, Fuster V, JCI 1990; 85:1234, 1990 Rong JX et al Circ 2001;104:2447
  38. 38. PPARs in Atherosclerosis: Castrillo A et. al. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1538. A C Li et al. J Clin Invest 2004;114:1564 PPAR signaling pathways influence macrophage gene expression and foam cell formation
  39. 39. T2WPDWT1W ClusterRGB l nc iph fc lf df pvf l nc iph fc lf df pvf l-lumen nc-necrotic core iph-intra plaque hemorrhage fc-fibrocellular tissue df-dense fibrous tissue lf=loose fibrous tissue pvf-perivascular fat Itskovich VV, Samber D, Mani V, et al Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 515 In-Vivo Cluster Analysis for Plaque Characterization
  40. 40. THE FREEDOM TRIAL FUTURE REVASCULARIZATION EVALUATION IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS:OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF MULTIVESSEL DISEASE 2) MRI-Diabetics: Reversibility, Statins-PPAR NHLBI 2005 (PI V Fuster)
  41. 41. THE EPIDEMIC OF CVD – NEED FOR NEW APPROACHES Epidemiology and Change in Emphasis - From the High Risk Plaque to the High Risk Symptomatic Patient - From the High Risk Asymptomati to the Intermediate and Low Risk Patient HRSP - Therapeutic Polypill & Single Pill HRAP - BAD, Diagnostic MR Imaging - BAD, Diagnostic & Rx - MR Plaque Composition - BAD, Diagnostic Molecular MR Contrast Enhanced, IRAP - Diagnostic CACS & CRP Biomarkers LRAP - Government, Polymeal, Children SHAPE & AEHA. Orlando, March 05, 2005
  42. 42. Cell & Molecular MRI Targets In Atherothrombotic Plaques Lipinski MJ, Fuster V, Fisher EA, Fayad ZA, Nature Cardiov. Med. 2004;1:1
  43. 43. Targeted Contrast Agent - Approaches Choudhury RP; Fuster V; Fayad ZA Nature Drug Disc. 2004;3:1
  44. 44. Lipid Rich Atherosclerotic Rabbit 24h Post Gadofluorine n=10 NZW Atherosclerotic rabbits No Enhancement in Controls (n=6) Pre Contrast 24 H Post Gadofluorine Sirol, M et. al. Circulation 2004; 109: 2890 – AHA 2004 -
  45. 45. Pre-contrast 48 hours post-contrast1 hr post-contrast 24 hr post-contrast 20x lumen wall 40x Frias JC, Fayad ZA, Fuster V et al. ISMRM 2004 rHDL-Gd-DTPA-DMPE-NBD conjugate (green) rHDL-Gd-DTPA-DMPE apoE-KO mice, 4.36 mmol/kg, 9.4T MRM
  46. 46. In Vivo Detection of Macrophages in Human Carotid Atheroma Use of Post-Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Particles of Iron (USPIO) MRI Pre-USPIO Post-USPIO 24h Post-USPIO 36h Areas of USPIO accumulation (Pearls staining, b) colocalizing with areas of high macrophage content (MAC 387 stain, c) in the fibrous cap region Trivedi AR et al. Stroke 2004; 35: 1631
  47. 47. Pre Contrast Post Contrast 3 day old thrombus Crush injured left carotid artery 30 minutes P.I. 60 minutes P.I. Molecular Imaging of Fibrin with MR Chronic Rabbit Model Thrombus in Left CCA fibrin MRA Fayad ZA Imaging Science Laboratories Control H&E Sirol M. et al. Circulation 2005 (In Press)
  48. 48. Diabetes and PAD - Proposed Sequence for an Integrated Plaque (IP)-MRI Diagnostic Protocol Combination of multi-weighted, post-Gadolinium and post-USPIO imaging Dellegrottaglie S, Mani V, Fayad Z, Moreno P, Fuster V, Rajagopalan S. 2005 PDW MRI of the Superficial femoral artery
  49. 49. THE FREEDOM TRIAL FUTURE REVASCULARIZATION EVALUATION IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS: OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF MULTIVESSEL DISEASE 3) MRI - Contrast Enhanced PAD NHLBI 2005 (PI V Fuster)
  50. 50. THE EPIDEMIC OF CVD – NEED FOR NEW APPROACHES Epidemiology and Change in Emphasis - From the High Risk Plaque to the High Risk Symptomatic Patient - From the High Risk Asymptomati to the Intermediate and Low Risk Patient HRSP - Therapeutic Polypill & Single Pill HRAP - BAD, Diagnostic MR Imaging - BAD, Diagnostic & Rx - MR Plaque Composition - BAD, Diagnostic Molecular MR Contrast Enhanced, IRAP - Diagnostic CACS & CRP Biomarkers LRAP - Government, Polymeal, Children SHAPE & AEHA. Orlando, March 05, 2005
  51. 51. ATHEROTHROMBOSIS: APPROACH IN 2005 Aggressive Intervention3 Effective Prevention1 Chronic Atherothrombosis CHD Equivalents HRAP- Subclinical CT / MRI Low Risk Modified from V Fuster, Circulation 1999; 99:1132 IRAP- Risk Frs CACS / CRP Acute Coronary Syndromes Early Detection 2 HRAP: High Risk Asymptomatic Patient - >2% y - >20% 10y IRAP: Intermediate Risk Asymptomatic Patient – 0.5-2% y - 5-20% 10y LOW RISK: FRS - < 0.5%y - < 5% 10 y
  52. 52. CHD RISK IN WOMEN - FRAMINGHAM SCORING (FRS) - 10 y Age, y HDL cholesterol < 35 -9 ≥ 60 -3 35-39 -4 50-59 0 40-44 0 45-49 1 45-49 3 35-44 2 50-54 6 < 35 5 55-59 7 Syst BP 60-64 8 < 120 -3 65-69 8 120-129 0 70-74 8 130-139 1 Cholesterol 140-149 2 < 160 -2 > 160 3 169-199 0 Diabetes 200-239 1 No 0 240-279 2 Yes 4 ≥ 280 3 Smoking No 0 Yes 2 Points 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >14 Total CHD (%) 2 3 4 5 7 8 10 13 16 20 25 31 37 45 > 53 Hard CHD (%) 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 13 16 20 25 30 35 > 45 Grundy SM, Pasternak R, Greenland P, Smith S, Fuster V, Circ 1999; 100:1481 ATP III - Aggressive Rx: Framingham, Diabetes, Metab. Synd: obese, BP, HDL, TC, Gluc - Physical inactivity JAMA 2001; 285:2475

×