Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

120530 Da Nang Municipal Wastewater

627 views

Published on

This presentation helped the planning agency to understand the options available for a rational implementation schedule, considering costs and benefits.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

120530 Da Nang Municipal Wastewater

  1. 1. MUNICIPAL WASTEWATERPre-Feasibility Studies in Industrial Waste Water Managementand Drainage SystemsCities Development Initiative for Asia (CDIA)Da NangFinal Report – Presentation for Task Force on Wednesday 30 May 2012
  2. 2. DA NANG CITY –WASTEWATER SYSTEMMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/20122SchematicLayoutExistingSituation(Source: Grontmij &Carl Bro 2009)
  3. 3. DA NANG CITY –WASTEWATER SYSTEMMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/20123SchematicLayoutPlan(Source: Grontmij &Carl Bro 2009 –recommendedoption)
  4. 4. THE TEN SERVICE ZONES FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTIONWWTP SON TRA WWTP NGU HANH SONMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/20124
  5. 5. PRIORITY PROJECTS Optional criteria for priority ranking: Low-income areas with dense population Resettlement areas New development areas Planned development areas Tourism areas Technical and financial rationale Other basis, to be identified Da Nang directions on priority ranking: Priority is for the coastal service zones draining to the easternbeaches. This is a main centre of the tourism economy in Da Nang.Municipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/20125
  6. 6. THE TEN SERVICE ZONESMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/20126 Idea for sequencing of works
  7. 7. THE TEN SERVICE ZONES - PRIORITY SEQUENCINGMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/20127
  8. 8. COST ESTIMATION – BASIC PREMISES Wastewater systems should be planned/designed with thecapacity required in the year 2020. For planning purposes, district population numbers for2020, as specified by DPI, should be used. In 2020, the targeted connection rate for householdsshould be 50%, and for all other wastewater producers100%, as per the Da Nang Wastewater Strategy of 2010. Should use the Da Nang Municipal Infrastructure Map(digital). The study’s calculations should comply with the official technical designcriteria for the sector. Cost estimation should be made according to the guidelines for publicinvestment projects.Municipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/20128
  9. 9. DA NANG WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Wastewater Management Strategy to the year 2020 (8438/QD-UBND,03/11/2010) Sets definite targets to be achieved by 2015 and 2020 Gives orientation for further development until 2030 and 2040 Attached: “Wastewater System Strategy” (July 2010) Three strategy targets important for our study: capacities of WWTPs Son Tra, Ngu Hanh Son, Hoa Xuan percentage of households to be connected to the system development of a separate wastewater system, with priority for new residential areas, tourist areas, and coastal areas Districts Son Tra and Ngu Hanh Son: Coastal area – Beaches a core asset for tourism - New residential areas Focus of study: To separate wastewater system from storm water system To substantially increase number of households connected to systemMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/20129
  10. 10. COST ESTIMATE – BASIC SCENARIOMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/201210
  11. 11. ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO FOR INITIAL INVESTMENT Basic Scenario – Initial Investment cost 100% Full coverage of the service zone by tertiary & secondary networks 50% connection rate (50% of expected number of wastewater producersin 2020) Scenario A – Initial investment cost down to 58% Selected coverage of the service zone by tertiary & secondary networks,namely just enough for achieving … 50% connection rate (50% of expected number of wastewater producersin 2020) Scenario B – Initial investment cost up to 101% Same as Basic Scenario, but tertiary and secondary networks use ahigher percentage of larger diameter pipes Scenario AB - Initial investment cost down to 59% Same as Scenario A, but tertiary and secondary networks use a higherpercentage of larger diameter pipesMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/201211
  12. 12. ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO FOR INITIAL INVESTMENTMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/201212
  13. 13. RECOMMENDED SCENARIO & FURTHER REFINEMENT Priority 1&2: Service zones C-ST1 and C-NHS1, C-ST2 and C-NHS2 Rationale: Most important and urgent is to stop pollution of beaches and sea by wastewater spills Therefore, have to connect all wastewater producers to a dedicated wastewater collection system at once Scenario: Adopt B Refinement: connect all wastewater producers at extra cost of about 3% Priority 3&4: Service zones R-ST1 and R-NHS1, R-ST2 and R-NHS2 Rationale: Important is to reduce the pollution of the river by wastewater spills Urgency not very high: connection rate 50% by 2020 is acceptable Should be selective in initial coverage Install extra capacity into tertiary and secondary networks to accommodate increasing connection rate Scenario: Adopt AB Refinement: none Priority 5: Service zones C/R-NHS3 and D-NHS1 Rationale: Residential development still at initial stage and wastewater production is at a low level Only connect areas with high wastewater production level: housing complexes, tourist resorts Install extra capacity into tertiary and secondary networks to accommodate increasing connection rate Scenario: Adopt AB Refinement: Reduce initial investment to 1/3 of cost of ABMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/201213
  14. 14. COST ESTIMATE – ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/201214
  15. 15. TIME SCHEDULEMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/201215
  16. 16. FURTHER STUDY Verify population growth estimates What is the maximum population density? For example, CIPR (2010)mentions densities varying between 1,674 persons/km2 in Lien Chieu to18,380 persons/km2 in Thanh Khe. Consider possible risks/issues and identify solutions Implications of saline environment Unexploded ordinance and toxic materials Need for maintaining access possibilities to premises Recommend mitigation measures for current situation Pump all water to the river? Discharge to the sea, through a long pipe? Consider technical and investment options Formulate priority projectsMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/201216
  17. 17. THE ENDThank youMunicipal Wastewater – Final Report – Presentation on 30/05/201217

×