Successfully reported this slideshow.

What are the main technologies being used in teaching and learning?

2

Share

Upcoming SlideShare
Key toolsonlineversion2018
Key toolsonlineversion2018
Loading in …3
×
1 of 25
1 of 25

More Related Content

Related Books

Free with a 14 day trial from Scribd

See all

What are the main technologies being used in teaching and learning?

  1. 1. Technologies that impact on teaching and learning. University of Wesminster Russell Stannard www.teachertrainingvideos.com
  2. 2. The other me
  3. 3. My talk Stannard, R. (2017). A Genuine Innovation In The Delivery And Form Of Feedback On Student’s Written Work. In M. Carrier, R. M. Damerow, & K. M. Bailey (Eds.), Digital Language Learning and Teaching: Research,Theory, and Practice .New York, NY: Routledge & TIRF. Mann, S & Stannard, R (2017). Using Screen Capture Feedback to Establish Social Presence and Increase Student Engagement. In C. Xiang ( Eds.) Cases on audio visual media in language education. IGI Global.
  4. 4. Key Technology /
  5. 5. Answers • Russell, it has to be screen cast technology. I use it all the time. Maria Garcia Seville • There are so many tools I use. I love Quizlet, Edmodo, Google tools but I think I would have to say screen capture. It is just so flexible, so useful both for teachers and students. Thomas Dalton London • No doubt. Screen casting technology. Iwona Kowska Poland • Russell, screen cast technology is everywhere. I guess it must be that. Michael Dukes New York
  6. 6. Where can you find it? • All the videos on the Khan Academy • All the free learning sites like Coursera, FutureLearn , EdEx etc. • All the new learning sites like Udemy • You the help and how to videos on YouTube • The learning material in Flipped Classroom courses. • Most online course built at universities or colleges • Most blended learning courses. It is everywhere
  7. 7. Screen capture=Screen cast
  8. 8. Screen Cast Technology • Saw technology at the BETT conference • First examples Att: https://www.linkedin.com/topic/creativity
  9. 9. Examples • Warwick University Article • Feedback on class presentations • Feedback on grammar point • Vocabulary feedback
  10. 10. Findings • Can give much more feedback. • Visual and oral. • More engaging. • More personal. • Useful for revision. • Flexible. • Distance Learning. • Special needs. • Clearer.
  11. 11. Emerging themes Closeness to teacher • There is reason to claim that through the use of screen capture as a medium of feedback, a closeness desired by students is created with their teachers. (Mathison 2012, p. 110) • “Using audio feedback is a very useful way of giving feedback. It makes me feel as if you are besides me. It is easier to comprehend what kind of idea you want to communicate to me. I appreciate that. I think I will use audio feedback with my TLs in the future”. (Mann 2015, p.162)
  12. 12. Personal • “It was a very positive, personalised and motivating experience.” (Harper el al. 2012, p.6) Use and reuse/more than a conference • the ability to rewind and stop their teacher at will is an advantage that screencasting offers over face-to-face conferences. Indeed, with screencasting, students can access live comments without the affective stress typically associated with having their teacher present. (Serror 2012, p.110)
  13. 13. Theme 1- Theme-Language Modifiers-Chatty style Comments-Personal, Dialogic, Non threatening Hyland and Hyland-2001 / Steve Man-2015 There is evidence that spoken feedback makes greater use of modality and hedging which help sweeten the pill (Hyland and Hyland 2001).
  14. 14. Theme 2 Inner voice Comments-Clear, Detailed, Easy to follow, Thompson and Lee 2012 Tutors are often having an ‘in the head’ internal dialogue while marking a student’s work
  15. 15. Theme 3 Teacher Presence Comments-Closeness to teacher, relationship with teacher Richardson and Swan Teacher presence is a key element in the success of blended and distance learning courses.
  16. 16. Access-Change • I listened a couple of times on my mobile but also listened to it on my computer. (Participant on Power Up course) • What I liked about the video feedback is that I could access it on my mobile. (Participant on Power Up course)
  17. 17. One technology Key Technology Feedback Reflection Fluency work Flipped Learning InformationGrammar Lessons Vocabulary Tips Pronunciation Listening material
  18. 18. Other uses • This student has recorded themselves giving a PowerPoint presentation. • This student has recorded themselves reflecting on a lesson they have done. • Information about exam • Grammar
  19. 19. Getting screen cast technology. Free • JING. • Screen cast-o-matic. • Cam Studio. Cost ( one payment) • SnagIT ( $30 one off payment). • Camtasia. • Adobe Captivate. • Articulate.
  20. 20. Conclusions -Possibly the most relevant technology in education. -Feedback idea has huge potential and is being widely researched. -Lot of other uses, especially in language education. -Real innovation takes place when you give this technology to students.
  21. 21. Recent chapter
  22. 22. References-1 Brick, B. and Holmes, J. (2008). Using screen capture software for student feedback: towards a methodology. IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, (CELDA). Retrieved from 11/07/2016. http://caaconference.co.uk/pastConferences/2008/proceedings/ Harper, F., Green, H. and Fernandez-Toro, M. (2012). Evaluating the integration of Jing screencasts in feedback on written assignments. In: 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning , 26-28 September 2012, Villach, Austria. Mathison, P (2012) Video Feedback in Higher Education - A Contribution to Improving the Quality of Written Feedback. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy Volume 07. Retrieved from 11/7/2016 https://www.idunn.no/dk/2012/02/video_feedback_in_higher_education_ -_a_contribution_to_impr?languageId=2
  23. 23. Refences-2 • Mann, S. (2015) Using screen capture software to improve the value of feedback on academic assignments in teacher education. In T. Farrell International Perspectives on English Language Teacher Education. Pp160-180. London: Palgrave Macmillan. • Hyland, F. and Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–212 • Richardson, J. Swan, K (2013). Examing Social Presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Online Learning Volume 7 Issue 1
  24. 24. References-3 • Stannard, R. (2014). Is this the start of a feedback revolution. How Technology could change the way we provide feedback. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 2014, Volume 3, No 2. • Stannard, R. (2017). A Genuine Innovation In The Delivery And Form Of Feedback On Student’s Written Work. In M. Carrier, R. M. Damerow, & K. M. Bailey (Eds.), Digital Language Learning and Teaching: Research, The ory, and Practice (pp. XX – XX). New York, NY: Routledge & TIRF.
  25. 25. Russell Stannard • Join my newsletter and make use of the hundreds of videos on my site. They are all free. www.teachertrainingvideos.com • Grab a card Learn Screen capture Learn SnagIT http://www.teachertrainingvideos.com/snagit/introduction-to- snagit.html Screen cast o matic http://www.teachertrainingvideos.com/screen-capture- software/free-screen-capture-o-matic.html

×