Environmental Compliance Expert at ERA Environmental Management Solutions
May. 28, 2015•0 likes•1,095 views
1 of 35
HazCom 2012 Changes Introduced by the GHS: Upcoming Changes and Your Responsibilities
May. 28, 2015•0 likes•1,095 views
Download to read offline
Report
Environment
The June 1, 2015 GHS Compliance deadline introduces some changes to hazard communication sheets (SDSs) and labels. This presentation outlines the changes to hazard communication you should expect as well as your responsibilities.
3. Changes Will We Cover
Differences between MSDS & GHS SDS
New Label Format
Additional Hazardous Chemicals Categories
Potential Points of Confusion
5. GHS Safety Data Sheet
Hazard Communication Standard of SDS had 9
sections
New GHS has 16 specific sections
Consistent with ANSI format, familiar to many
employees
Section 2 delivers information up-front
Some Sections are not enforced by OSHA because
they are enforced by other regulatory bodies
6. The 16 SDS Sections
Section 1. Chemical Product & Company Information
Section 2. Hazards Identification
Section 3. Composition/Information on Ingredients
Section 4. First Aid Measures
Section 5. Fire Fighting Measures
Section 6. Accidental Release Measures
Section 7. Handling and Storage
Section 8. Exposure Controls/Personal Protection
Section 9. Physical and Chemical Properties
Section 10. Stability and Reactivity
Section 11. Toxicological Information
Section 12. Ecological Information*
Section 13. Disposal Considerations* * Not Enforced by OSHA
Section 14. Transport Information*
Section 15. Regulatory Information*
Section 16. Other Information
8. Label Elements
1) Product Identifier
2) Precautionary Statements
3) Hazard Statements
4) Signal Word
5) Hazard Pictogram
Red borders, black symbol
6) Supplementary info
16. Updating MSDSs
If you are a manufacturer, distributor or importer
you must re-author your SDSs
It is the responsibility of your supplier to supply
you with the most up-to-date MSDSs or SDSs they
have authored
17. Two exceptions:
1. If you have not recently purchased an item from your
supplier…
It is your responsibility to check in with them for the most
updated version.
2. If you are shipping a finished product
internationally…
It is your responsibility, not your domestic supplier’s, to
author the country-specific GHS compliant SDS
19. Hazards Classification
GHS Uses 3 Hazard Groups
Health Hazards
- Dangers to human health
-10 Health Hazards
Physical Hazards
- Damage to the body
- 16 Physical Hazards
Environmental
Hazards
- Not under OSHA
jurisdiction
- Danger to environment
- 3 Environmental Hazards
20. Hazard Group
Different types of hazards
e.g. ‘Gases under pressure’ = class
in Physical Hazards
Class
Category
Health, Physical or
Environmental
Hazard Statement
Subsections of classes
Assigned numbers/letters
Category 1 = most hazardous
Standardized statement
Describes hazard category
22. Best to use the two-tiered approach:
1) Have the most accurate raw chemical
data about your materials
2) Reference and compare multiple
regulatory resources before making
any final determinations
23. Classification:
Reliability
The key here is balance - not so many as SDS
takes too long to author, but enough to classify with
confidence
Consult 3 to 5 trustworthy sources
Use those same sources each time
Recommended: CLP, ECOTOX, RTECS, Sigma
MSDS, HSNO CCID
25. Vendor
Communication
The GHS Implementation makes communicating
with your vendors essential and urgent
But obtaining chemical info from vendors can be
challenging
Goal is to avoid unrealistic conservative
classifications
27. Risk Management Technique 1:
Ensure SDS Accessibility
Centralize documents – single digital
database
Tags and other metadata to make
queries/searches easier
Accessibility from mobile
devices/tablets/laptops
28. Risk Management Technique 2:
Ensure Fastest Possible SDS
Retrieval
Ease of user interface and searching
Respond to emergencies
Mobile App for fast retrieval
30. Most businesses are turning to SDS
Authoring Software to get them through
the GHS transition without the stress of
deadlines, loss of productivity, and
interruptions to other EH&S reporting
obligations.
31. SDS Authoring Software from ERA
Environmental Management Solutions
is the most accurate,
cost effective, and
fast solution available.
32. Twenty years providing solutions for chemical
compliance.
Award-winning team and award-winning software.
Exclusive partnerships with major chemical & coating
manufacturers to get superior data (AkzoNobel, Sherwin
Williams, Du Pont, and many more).
33. Want to learn more about the
risks the GHS presents to your
business?
Download your Free Guide:
Business Risks and Opportunities
Associated with the GHS Transition
Im going to talk about Safety data sheets and labels, as both have undergone some re-formatting. Once a hazard is classified, you must communicate the corresponding signal word, hazard statements, precautionary statements and pictograms on the label and Safety Data Sheet (SDS).
Here are the 16 sections of the new SDS. Section 2, Hazard Identification, is the most important section, containing classification information as well as information that is repeated on the GHS label.
As we mentioned by June 2015, all manufacturers and distributors must be using GHS compliant Safety Data Sheets
Important: End users of the chemicals do not have to proactively search and replace their MSDSs with SDSs. An end user would need to have the most up to date SDS or MSDS on their floors.
However, if you are in any way responsible for authoring SDS or labels for chemical containers (including secondary chemical containers) you will need to start replacing your MSDSs with SDS. Most manufacturers are investing in a GHS SDS authoring system to handle this difficult task for them to ensure they don’t lose money or make mistakes during the GHS implementation.
Highlighted are the new section on a GHS compliant SDS
Again, section 2 is where most of the information is delivered
Section 2 is also almost identical to the GHS Label elements
Im going to talk about Safety data sheets and labels, as both have undergone some re-formatting. Once a hazard is classified, you must communicate the corresponding signal word, hazard statements, precautionary statements and pictograms on the label and Safety Data Sheet (SDS).
Here are the 16 sections of the new SDS. Section 2, Hazard Identification, is the most important section, containing classification information as well as information that is repeated on the GHS label.
As we mentioned by June 2015, all manufacturers and distributors must be using GHS compliant Safety Data Sheets
Important: End users of the chemicals do not have to proactively search and replace their MSDSs with SDSs. An end user would need to have the most up to date SDS or MSDS on their floors.
However, if you are in any way responsible for authoring SDS or labels for chemical containers (including secondary chemical containers) you will need to start replacing your MSDSs with SDS. Most manufacturers are investing in a GHS SDS authoring system to handle this difficult task for them to ensure they don’t lose money or make mistakes during the GHS implementation.
Most drastic changes happen to the label
Pictograms
Pictograms are the standardized symbols used to quickly give material handlers a picture of the type of hazards the material presents. Many GHS pictograms will be familiar to North American consumers, as many of them have remained the same from the U.S. HazCom regulations.
GHS pictograms:
Are always framed within a red square frame set on point . The image itself is always a black symbol on a white background. This means that some manufacturers will need to upgrade their systems to print color labels or start using pre-printed labels. Coming up shortly are the GHS pictograms that can be featured on a label along with the hazards each one is associated with.
Supplementary Information
This section is not mandatory but if included Supplementary information should include:
Additional instructions for handling the material that aren’t covered by the GHS precautionary statements.
Hazards not otherwise classified (HNOC). (Some chemical hazards are not classified by the GHS guidelines, but should still be communicated in labels and SDSs. ERA actually produced a guide to GHS classifications and categories for more information on HNOCs.)
This section must also identify the percentage of ingredient(s) of unknown acute toxicity when it is present in a concentration of ≥1%
open loop to nfpa label issue
Here is a snippet of an OSHA sample label
The second important point I wanted to make is that the chemicals you see here have been added to the hazardous chemical; list
In the revised Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), OSHA has added pyrophoric gases, simple asphyxiants and combustible dust to the definition of "hazardous chemical". This means All three must be addressed both on container labels and SDSs
1 = danger
2,3 = warning
I will now Pass you over to Sarah Sajedi, co founder and CTO of ERA environmental
She will be discussing the importance of proper classification and how to ensure accuracy and reliability in the process. We will walk you through our Sulfur case study to show you exactly what to look out for.
process flow chart using example of chemical
With June 2015 less than a year away, manufacturers and distributors are strongly encouraged to begin the process of reclassifying their hazardous chemicals in order to update their label and SDs.
Let’s review the basics behind GHS Hazard Classification. More details can be found in ERA’s guide to GHS Hazard Classification that can be found on our blog. Where can they get this? Can we email them the landing page?.
When you have a product, you must go through the classification steps.
First, the GHS uses three major hazard groups: Health Hazards, Physical Hazards and Environmental Hazards -These aren’t required by OSHA.
Health hazards present dangers to human health (i.e. breathing or vision) while physical hazards cause damage to the body (like skin corrosion).
each hazard group has hazard classes THAT describe the different types of hazards. For example, Gases under Pressure is an example of a class in the physical hazards group.
There are 16 physical hazard classes and 10 health hazard classes: each hazard class is then further divided according to different categories. For example, Self-Reactive Chemicals have 7 categories. Each category has rules or criteria to determine what chemicals are assigned to that category. Categories are assigned numbers (or letters) and category 1 (or A) is the most hazardous.
For each category of a class, a standardized statement, called a hazard statement, is used to describe the hazard. For example, the hazard statement for chemicals which meet the criteria for the class Self-heating substances and mixtures, Category 1 is Self-heating; may catch fire. This hazard statement would appear both on the label and on the SDS.
Note that To classify your mixtures you should use available testing data for the mixture itself along with the GHS classification guidelines. An exception to this is if your mixture is a carcinogen, a mutagen, or a reproductive toxin where classification may be based on the strength of evidence and modified on a case-by-case basis
break it out
break it out
break it out
The GHS Implementation best practises touch on two things, ensuring accurate data and managing risk
The best way to guarantee SDS Accuracy is by automating your vendor communication
It oftens seems that environmental information needs to be wrestled out of the hands of a supplier. Most suppliers are reluctant to share their specific chemical information for a number of reasons including the risk it might give their competitors an advantage, and the perception that attaining this information is costly and time consuming.
When a supplier is asked to provide additional information to their end-users, it requires time, which in the absence of an automated information system can be significant, especially for chemical vendors with many materials and products. This creates a constant back and forth struggle between the supplier and the vendor in which one tries to get more information while the other is tries to pay for the cost in attaining and communicating it.
The GHS Implementation best practises touch on two things, ensuring accurate data and managing risk
The best way to guarantee SDS Accuracy is by automating your vendor communication
It oftens seems that environmental information needs to be wrestled out of the hands of a supplier. Most suppliers are reluctant to share their specific chemical information for a number of reasons including the risk it might give their competitors an advantage, and the perception that attaining this information is costly and time consuming.
When a supplier is asked to provide additional information to their end-users, it requires time, which in the absence of an automated information system can be significant, especially for chemical vendors with many materials and products. This creates a constant back and forth struggle between the supplier and the vendor in which one tries to get more information while the other is tries to pay for the cost in attaining and communicating it.
the GHS practises also ties heavily into Risk management.
According to industry research from Accenture, financial institutions are beginning to implement a single risk management “architectural point” for their global operations.
One of the primary examples of EH&S being on the forefront of risk management is the 2015 North American adoption of the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). The GHS transition is taking place on an international level, and is causing regulatory agencies around the world to adjust their Hazard Communication standards.
Businesses will need to start updating their chemical labels and authoring them to compliance with the GHS-style SDSs, which are more comprehensive than MSDSs. This will require assessing new tools and options, re-evaluating current processes, and contacting your chemical suppliers to ensure all their data is up to date with new regulations. All of these can be considered risk management strategies centralized in your EH&S department.
As your business adopts the GHS guidelines, it will be faced with a great deal of options and each of them carries a certain amount of risk and reward. The core of GHS is to improve the way hazardous information is received in a way that ensure workers understand how to deal with hazardous chemicals. Transitioning towards a GHS compliant workplace will help create a safer work environment for employees. This directly translates into an improved corporate image and a reduction in hazard-related risk management. This makes the GHS transition the ideal opportunity to invest in a tool that will assess and mitigate associated risks and improve overall EH&S performance. A safer workplace means safer employees, which puts customers at ease and creates a trust-worthy image for your company. Everybody wins.
the GHS practises also ties heavily into Risk management.
According to industry research from Accenture, financial institutions are beginning to implement a single risk management “architectural point” for their global operations.
One of the primary examples of EH&S being on the forefront of risk management is the 2015 North American adoption of the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). The GHS transition is taking place on an international level, and is causing regulatory agencies around the world to adjust their Hazard Communication standards.
Businesses will need to start updating their chemical labels and authoring them to compliance with the GHS-style SDSs, which are more comprehensive than MSDSs. This will require assessing new tools and options, re-evaluating current processes, and contacting your chemical suppliers to ensure all their data is up to date with new regulations. All of these can be considered risk management strategies centralized in your EH&S department.
As your business adopts the GHS guidelines, it will be faced with a great deal of options and each of them carries a certain amount of risk and reward. The core of GHS is to improve the way hazardous information is received in a way that ensure workers understand how to deal with hazardous chemicals. Transitioning towards a GHS compliant workplace will help create a safer work environment for employees. This directly translates into an improved corporate image and a reduction in hazard-related risk management. This makes the GHS transition the ideal opportunity to invest in a tool that will assess and mitigate associated risks and improve overall EH&S performance. A safer workplace means safer employees, which puts customers at ease and creates a trust-worthy image for your company. Everybody wins.
the GHS practises also ties heavily into Risk management.
According to industry research from Accenture, financial institutions are beginning to implement a single risk management “architectural point” for their global operations.
One of the primary examples of EH&S being on the forefront of risk management is the 2015 North American adoption of the Globally Harmonized System (GHS). The GHS transition is taking place on an international level, and is causing regulatory agencies around the world to adjust their Hazard Communication standards.
Businesses will need to start updating their chemical labels and authoring them to compliance with the GHS-style SDSs, which are more comprehensive than MSDSs. This will require assessing new tools and options, re-evaluating current processes, and contacting your chemical suppliers to ensure all their data is up to date with new regulations. All of these can be considered risk management strategies centralized in your EH&S department.
As your business adopts the GHS guidelines, it will be faced with a great deal of options and each of them carries a certain amount of risk and reward. The core of GHS is to improve the way hazardous information is received in a way that ensure workers understand how to deal with hazardous chemicals. Transitioning towards a GHS compliant workplace will help create a safer work environment for employees. This directly translates into an improved corporate image and a reduction in hazard-related risk management. This makes the GHS transition the ideal opportunity to invest in a tool that will assess and mitigate associated risks and improve overall EH&S performance. A safer workplace means safer employees, which puts customers at ease and creates a trust-worthy image for your company. Everybody wins.
Transitioning towards a GHS compliant workplace will help create a safer work environment for employees. This directly translates into an improved corporate image and a reduction in hazard-related risk management. This makes the GHS transition the ideal opportunity to invest in a tool that will assess and mitigate associated risks and improve overall EH&S performance. A safer workplace means safer employees, which puts customers at ease and creates a trust-worthy image for your company. Everybody wins.
Sending you a follow up email next week
you can expect to find the slides of this presentation as well as the recording.
We will also be sneding you some materials on SDS Authoring and Classification