Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

An Investigation of Self-Interference Reduction Strategy in Correlated SM-OFDMA Systems

1,623 views

Published on

R. Nordin, M. Ismail, "An Investigation of Self-Interference Reduction Strategy in Correlated SM-OFDMA Systems", Proceedings of 17th Asia-Pasific Conference on Communications. APCC 2011, Oct. 2011

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

An Investigation of Self-Interference Reduction Strategy in Correlated SM-OFDMA Systems

  1. 1. Dynamic Subcarrier Allocation with ESINR Metric in Correlated SM-OFDMA APCC 2011 Dr. R. Nordin & Prof. Dr. M. Ismail Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  2. 2. Presentation Outline Self-interference DSA-ESINR Simulation Parameters Results & Analysis Conclusion
  3. 3. 3Correlation in MIMO Occurs due to: 12 RBS=0.0,RMS=0.0 RBS=0.4,RMS=0.4 10 RBS=0.5,RMS=0.5 RBS=0.0,RMS=0.9 8 RBS=0.9,RMS=0.0 capacity (bps/Hz)• antenna location/spacing RBS=0.9,RMS=0.9 6 RBS=1.0,RMS=1.0• lack of scatterers 4• angular spread. 2 0 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 SNR (dB) Resulting in self-interference. Retransmissions and equalisation do notimprove the BER performance.
  4. 4. 4Self-Interference MIMO only works when the channel is inlow correlation. In practice: h’ s0 h’ r0 r0=r1=h’(s0+s1) BS h’ MS Scenario: all spatial layers ` h’ are fully correlated s1 r1 Mathematically: If h’ coefficients are correlated, then [H] is [S] =[H]-1[R] ill-conditioned matrix and difficult to revert
  5. 5. 5SINR Metric As the performance metric to determine thesubcarrier allocation. MMSE filter q= spatial layer Main spatial layer 2 Gk H k qq Es q ESINRk 2 2 2 Gk H k qj, j q Es Gk qq Gk qj, j q N Knowledge of self-interference k= subcarrier index
  6. 6. 6DSA-SINR Involves sorting, comparing and simplearithmetic. Ranks users from lowest to highest SINR. Fairness: Allow poor users to have the next‘best’ subcarriers. Prevents users from sharing the samesubcarrier with the adjacent layer (interferer).
  7. 7. 7System Model X1 Tx1 Rx1 H1 X1 With Index 1 Transmitter at Base Station OFDM H3 X1User k Input With Index 2 Data Scrambling/ FEC/ Symbol Serial to Parallel& DSA H2 Rx2 X1X2 Puncturing/ Interleaving Mapping Spatial Multiplexing mapping X2 Tx2 With Index 3 H4 X2 X2 OFDM With Index 4 Uplink process Index 1 2 3 4 Downlink process Index 4 ESINR and channel Index 1 DSA Index 2 } DSA-ESINR gain feedback from other users Scheme Index 3 Index 2 Index 3 Index 1 Index 4 } DSA-Scheme 1 ESINR1 ESINR2 [ H3 ] [ H4 ] ESINR calculation Receiver at Mobile Station k [ H1 H3 ] [ H2 H4 ] S1 Y1 DSA OFDM User k Deinterleaving/ S1 S2 Parallel to MMSE [ H1 H3 ] Demapping Symbol Output Depuncturing/ Viterbi Serial& De- Linear Demapping Data Decoding/ Descrambling Multiplexing Detection Y2 DSA S2 [ H2 H4 ] Demapping OFDM
  8. 8. 8Simulation Setup Nsub= 768, NFFT= 1024 for 16 users, 48subcarriers per user 3GPP-SCM ‘Urban Micro’: 1 Rms delay spread= 251 ns 0.9 0.8 0.7 Normalised power  Excess delay= 1200 ns 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3  2000 i.i.d Rayleigh 0.2 0.1 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Excess delay (ns) Six MCS schemes, consists of BPSK,QPSK, 16-QAM and 64-QAM with ½ or ¾coding rate
  9. 9. 9Correlation Model Kronecker product, RMIMO=RMS RBS ‘Default’ = generated by the channel model,i.e. practical scenario ‘Forced’ = ideal channel environment Correlation Coefficient Correlation Modes RBS RMS ‘Default’ 0.45 0.32 ‘Forced’ 0.00 0.00
  10. 10. 10 BER Performance 0 0 10 10 DSA-ESINR M1 DSA-ESINR M1Bit Error Rate (BER) Bit Error Rate (BER) -1 DSA-Sch1 M1 -1 10 10 DSA-Sch1 M1 DSA-ESINR M2 DSA-ESINR M2 DSA-Sch1 M2 DSA-Sch1 M2 DSA-ESINR M3 DSA-ESINR M3 DSA-Sch1 M3 DSA-Sch1 M3 -2 DSA-ESINR M4 10 -2 DSA-ESINR M4 DSA-Sch1 M4 10 DSA-Sch1 M4 DSA-ESINR M5 DSA-ESINR M5 DSA-Sch1 M5 DSA-Sch1 M5 DSA-ESINR M6 DSA-ESINR M6 -3 DSA-Sch1 M6 10 -3 DSA-Sch1 M6 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 10 Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in dB -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in dB ‘Forced’ ‘Default’
  11. 11. 11Conclusions SINR with combination of DSA can minimise the effect of self-interference. Allocation improves as SNR increase. Future works:  Consider different case of correlation scenarios, e.g. moderate, full correlation  Apply adaptive MCS on the BS Tx antenna  Study the effect of self-interference between STBC and SM
  12. 12. Thank You!

×