Living next to a flagship development              Research on creating mutual, local benefits between the residential nei...
About...How the strategic plan and urban design can create mutual, local benefits between the residentialneighbourhood Van...
3/57ContentINTRO           Flagship development                Context                    Problems/aims         RESEARCH  ...
INTRO                        FLAGSHIP DEVELOPMENT Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & disadvantag...
5/57Flagship development“significant, high-profile and prestigious land and property developmentwhich plays an influential...
6/57Examples                  Canary Wha                            rf - London                                        - 1...
7/57Flagship development                          Positive                                                Negative        ...
INTRO                                             CONTEXT Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & dis...
9/57Amsterdam                                                                                                             ...
10/57Amsterdam                       Author 2012 (source: Geoloket TU Delft, 2011)Flagship development          Context   ...
11/57Overhoeks & Van der Pekbuurt                        Overhoeks                                                        ...
12/57 Overhoeks Author, 2011 Author, 2011                                                                                 ...
13/57 Overhoeks                                                                                High income households     ...
14/57 Overhoeks                                                                                Plans for 2017             ...
15/57Van der Pekbuurt  1 Tolhuistuin                                                                                      ...
16/57Van der PekbuurtSince 1920Low incomehouseholds95% Socialhousing50% Foreignbackground Flagship development   Context  ...
INTRO                                  PROBLEMS & AIM Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & disadva...
18/57                                    Problem statement                                                  Negative effec...
19/57                                                    Aim                 Let the residential neighbourhood Van der Pek...
RESEARCH                    BENEFITS & DISADVANTAGES  Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & disadva...
21/57Effects of flagship development                                                                                      ...
22/57Local effects of flagship development    Benefits/opportunities                                          Disadvantage...
23/57Local effects of flagship development    Benefits/opportunities                                          Disadvantage...
24/57Opportunities & threats Overhoeks & Van der Pekbuurt          €350 social housing          €550          €650 market ...
RESEARCH                                   STRATEGIC PLAN  Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & di...
26/57Stakeholders                                   Municipal board                          Atelier Shell                ...
27/57Benefits for key actors Corporate Social Responsibility • Positive for company’s reputation • Attractive employee • H...
28/57Local effects of flagship development    Benefits/opportunities                                          Disadvantage...
29/57Strategic planGoal 1: Inclusive aims                                        1 Attention towards deprived communities ...
30/57Strategic planGoal 1: Inclusive aims                                        1 Attention towards deprived communities ...
31/57Goal 1: Inclusive aims                  Municipal board                       Atelier Shell                 Amsterdam...
32/57Goal 3: Local community participation                                                              1 Questionnaire   ...
RESEARCH                                    URBAN DESIGN  Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & dis...
34/57Urban design Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & disadvantages   Strategic plan   Urban desi...
35/57Three areas                                                                                                          ...
36/57Phasing                                                                                               Phase 1 (2012) ...
37/57Phasing                                                                                               Phase 1 (2012) ...
38/57Phasing                                                                                               Phase 1 (2012) ...
39/57Phasing                                                                                               Phase 1 (2012) ...
40/57Local effects of flagship development    Benefits/opportunities                                          Disadvantage...
41/57Design goals                                                              1 More inclusive spacesGoal 1: Create socia...
42/57                            €                                  €                        €                            ...
43/57Goal 3: Facilities, amenities                                                                                        ...
44/57Goal 4: Inclusive, outward focus                                                                                     ...
45/57Goal 4: Inclusive, outward focusResidential block sight     lines concept Flagship development     Context   Problems...
46/57Goal 4: Inclusive, outward focus Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & disadvantages   Strateg...
47/57Goal 4: Inclusive, outward focus Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & disadvantages   Strateg...
48/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoods                                                                                       ...
49/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoodsSection at canal between Overhoeks and Van der Pekbuurt  Flagship development     Conte...
50/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoodsSection at canal between Overhoeks and Van der Pekbuurt  Flagship development     Conte...
51/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoods Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & disadvantages   Strategic...
52/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoods Flagship development   Context   Problems & aim   Benefits & disadvantages   Strategic...
CONCLUSIONS                                       IMPLICATIONS &                                      FUTURE RESEARCH     ...
54/57ImplicationsAmsterdam                                                      Western Europe • Developers at Ymere, Vest...
55/57Future research • Interview persons with most influence • Several case studies • Comparing planning processes Flagshi...
56/57Recap...How the strategic plan and urban design can create mutual, local benefits between the residentialneighbourhoo...
Thank you!Questions?             Presentation and thesis available online:                www.slideshare.net/RobinBoelsums
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Living next to a flagship development (graduation presentation)

392 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
392
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
16
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Living next to a flagship development (graduation presentation)

  1. 1. Living next to a flagship development Research on creating mutual, local benefits between the residential neighbourhood Van der Pekbuurt and the contemporary flagship area Overhoeks Amsterdam, in socioeconomic and spatial terms Robin BoelsumsAuthor 2011 Graduation presentation
  2. 2. About...How the strategic plan and urban design can create mutual, local benefits between the residentialneighbourhood Van der Pekbuurt and the contemporary flagship area Overhoeks Amsterdam,in socioeconomic and spatial terms tegic Urban Stra design plan
  3. 3. 3/57ContentINTRO Flagship development Context Problems/aims RESEARCH Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design CONCLUSION Implications & future research Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  4. 4. INTRO FLAGSHIP DEVELOPMENT Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  5. 5. 5/57Flagship development“significant, high-profile and prestigious land and property developmentwhich plays an influential and catalytic role in urban regeneration”(Bianchini et al., 1992, p.252) Rationale De-industrialisation Neoliberalism Globalisation “x”Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  6. 6. 6/57Examples Canary Wha rf - London - 1980s 990s Kop van Zuid - Rotterdam - 1 Lisbon - former EXPO Docklands - Dublin - 1990s - 1990sFlagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  7. 7. 7/57Flagship development Positive Negative Create wealth Benefits unevenly distributed Create jobs Fragmentation Housing Areas unwelcoming Attract tourists appearance Attract investorsFlagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  8. 8. INTRO CONTEXT Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  9. 9. 9/57Amsterdam Volendam Purmerend Zaanstad Beverwijk IJmuiden Monnickendam Zaandam Bloemendaal Haarlem Almere Amsterdam Diemen Hoofddorp Schiphol Amstelveen Weesp Naarden Hillegom Bussum Nieuw-Vennep Lisse Uithoorn Laren Author 2011Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  10. 10. 10/57Amsterdam Author 2012 (source: Geoloket TU Delft, 2011)Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  11. 11. 11/57Overhoeks & Van der Pekbuurt Overhoeks Van der Pekbuurt border Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  12. 12. 12/57 Overhoeks Author, 2011 Author, 2011 Since 2004 Shell moved out Film museum2008 Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  13. 13. 13/57 Overhoeks High income households Expensive apartments Elite2012 Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  14. 14. 14/57 Overhoeks Plans for 2017 More housing Prestigious office towers2012 Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  15. 15. 15/57Van der Pekbuurt 1 Tolhuistuin 2 Van der PekpleinAuthor, 2012 Author, 2011 high percentage 0-18 years high percentage not-western 100 high percentage one-parent families immigrants 80 low ratio jobs/labour force 60 Valuation of Immovable 40 Property Act (WOZ) high share of 20 high percentage 2 minima households 0 social housinghigh percentage unemployed low rate satisfaction looking for work with neighbourhood low Cito-score low objective safety low percentage with low subjective safety start qualification 1 Volewijck Noord Amsterdam Attention area Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  16. 16. 16/57Van der PekbuurtSince 1920Low incomehouseholds95% Socialhousing50% Foreignbackground Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  17. 17. INTRO PROBLEMS & AIM Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  18. 18. 18/57 Problem statement Negative effects Disbalance local and global needsFlagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  19. 19. 19/57 Aim Let the residential neighbourhood Van der Pekbuurt benefit from the adjacent contemporary flagship development Overhoeks and vice versa, in spatial and socioeconomic terms.Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  20. 20. RESEARCH BENEFITS & DISADVANTAGES Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  21. 21. 21/57Effects of flagship development Strengths Bo ost civic pride References References ers Loftman, Nevin:303 hip develop Boost business confidenc : 101 e s Doucet 2009 Aims of flag Raising property values Loftman, Nevin:303 y S myth 1995 lth for the cit 167 Raising developm9; Grodach:353 Loftman, Nevin:303 Cre ate more wea Ro driquez et al: Ar , Ne en vin 1995:29 t activitiy in adjoining areas nging local p erceptions 92; Loftmanrest the spiral of decline in urban area rodach:353 Loftman, Nevin:303 Cha Bian chini et al 19 Benefits for all residentsucet 2009:162; Gs Loftman, Nevin:303 ities on the map 1995 1995:303; Do : wealthnjobsvin aces5:299 , , Ne , pl 199 Put c Smyth ; Loftman, Ne vin Loftman, Nevin:304 se regenerati on ini et al 1992 1992; Loftma Cataly Bianch og lu and Healey anic” growth 1992; Tavsan Weaknesses Promotic “org B ianchini et al g P lace-marketin Doucet 2009 Social polarisation vate se ctor finance 09:102 Attract pri Doucet 20 Fragmentation of cities Loftman, Nevin: 300; Do Inter-city c ompetition Loftman, Ne vin 1995:299 dividu In Loftman, Nevin: 305; Do ucet 2009:104 nts al planning, not integrat come reside ed ucet 2009:105 Attract high in evelopment Grodach:353 Concentrate investmen Wilkinson in Loftman, Ne Local econom ic d in 1995:304 gh t on few places only vin:306 Loftman, Nev Hi financial risk nchin i et al 1992 Doucet 2009 Attract visito rs b al hierarchy Grodach:353 Alien, Nevin 1995ing3; Bia m a n, unwelcom :30 apearance Loftman, Nevin:307 Defend p osition in glo Doucet 20 09: 103; LoftNo public re Loftman, Nevin es sources for deprived ne Boost mun icipal revenu city ighbourhoods Loftm image for the Benefits are unevenly di an, Nevin Revit alising an attractive Residents distrust expe stributed Loftman, Nevin:309; Tem nces of government elova:3 w uc LoDoecon et,omic9re 200 Eisinger:323 ouncil in turns ms Manchester C Municipal ai Temelova:3; Eisinger:331 oucet, 2009 L ocal quality a nd benefit y Threats D D oucet, 2009 et: no reliable regeneration References Loftman, Nevin:306 out of povert Instability ,of evin 1995:304 mark He lping people m munities Loft man N s deprived co cts Delay, curtailment, failure of projects Loftman, Nevin:306 Atte ntion toward ing flagship proje tion in plann Oversupply of prestigious projects Loftman, Nevin:307 Resid ent participa Opportunities Loftman, Nevin:312 Generate socially just outcomes Create more inclusive spaces Doucet 2009:106 Inclusive aims of key actors Doucet 2009:106 Provide possibilities for housing career for residents Wille:2010 Amenities, transport, recreational facilities, jobs, housing Doucet et al, 2010 Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  22. 22. 22/57Local effects of flagship development Benefits/opportunities Disadvantages/threats 1 Attention towards deprived communities 1 Fragmentation of cities 2 Resident participation in planning flagship 2 Social polarisation projects 3 Raising development activitiy in adjoining 3 No public resources for deprived areas neighbourhoods 4 Inclusive aims of key actors 4 Residents distrust expences of government 5 More inclusive spaces 5 Alien, unwelcoming appearance of flagship 6 Provide possibilities for housing career area 7 Amenities 6 Delay, curtailment, failure of projects 8 Possibilities for transport 7 Individual planning, not integrated 9 Recreational facilities 10 Housing 11 Urban places 12 Economic opportunities (jobs) Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  23. 23. 23/57Local effects of flagship development Benefits/opportunities Disadvantages/threats 1 Attention towards deprived communities 1 No public resources for deprived 2 Resident participation in planning flagship neighbourhoods projects 2 Residents distrust expences of government 3 Raising development activitiy in adjoining areas 3 Delay, curtailment, failure of projects 4 Inclusive aims of key actors 4 Individual planning, not integrated 1 More inclusive spaces 1 Fragmentation of cities 2 Provide possibilities for housing career 2 Social polarisation 3 Amenities 3 No public resources for deprived 4 Possibilities for transport neighbourhoods 5 Recreational facilities 4 Residents distrust expenses of government 6 Housing 5 Alien, unwelcoming appearance of flagship 7 Urban places area 8 Economic opportunities (jobs) 6 Delay, curtailment, failure of projects Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  24. 24. 24/57Opportunities & threats Overhoeks & Van der Pekbuurt €350 social housing €550 €650 market rent for sale - mid prices for sale - high prices No possibilities housing career Unwelcoming appearance Spatial fragmentation Flagship development Context Problems & aim “Residents of Van der Pekbuurt look at Overhoeks with suspicion” Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan ” (Stuart, 2012, chairman housing association Van der Pekbuurt) Residents distrust municipal spending “x Urban design Implications
  25. 25. RESEARCH STRATEGIC PLAN Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  26. 26. 26/57Stakeholders Municipal board Atelier Shell Amsterdam North Urban design Geurst and ING Real Estate Schulze arch. Ymere Architects Shell Vesteda Branding group Projectbureau EYE Noordwaarts Instructing parties Developers Overhoeks Tolhuistuin team Developers Van der Pekbuurt Urban designers Instructing Guiding Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  27. 27. 27/57Benefits for key actors Corporate Social Responsibility • Positive for company’s reputation • Attractive employee • High demand for companies applying CSR Viability Public approval and enthusiasm Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  28. 28. 28/57Local effects of flagship development Benefits/opportunities Disadvantages/threats 1 Attention towards deprived communities 1 No public resources for deprived 2 Resident participation in planning flagship neighbourhoods projects 2 Residents distrust expences of government 3 Raising development activitiy in adjoining areas 3 Delay, curtailment, failure of projects 4 Inclusive aims of key actors 4 Individual planning, not integrated 1 More inclusive spaces 1 Fragmentation of cities 2 Provide possibilities for housing career 2 Social polarisation 3 Amenities 3 No public resources for deprived 4 Possibilities for transport neighbourhoods 5 Recreational facilities 4 Residents distrust expenses of government 6 Housing 5 Alien, unwelcoming appearance of flagship 7 Urban places area 8 Economic opportunities (jobs) 6 Delay, curtailment, failure of projects Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  29. 29. 29/57Strategic planGoal 1: Inclusive aims 1 Attention towards deprived communities 2 Resident participation in planning flagship projects 3 Raising development activitiy in adjoining areasGoal 2: Inform local community 4 Inclusive aims of key actors 5 No public resources for deprived neighbourhoodsGoal 3: Local community participation 6 Residents distrust expences of government 7 Delay, curtailment, failure of projectsGoal 4: Integrate plans 8 Individual planning, not integrated Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  30. 30. 30/57Strategic planGoal 1: Inclusive aims 1 Attention towards deprived communities 2 Resident participation in planning flagship projects 3 Raising development activitiy in adjoining areasGoal 2: Inform local community 4 Inclusive aims of key actors 5 No public resources for deprived neighbourhoodsGoal 3: Local community participation 6 Residents distrust expences of government 7 Delay, curtailment, failure of projectsGoal 4: Integrate plans Target group at Overhoeks 8 Individual planning,der Pekbuurt Target group at Van not integrated Area to create benefits Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  31. 31. 31/57Goal 1: Inclusive aims Municipal board Atelier Shell Amsterdam North Urban design Geurst and ING Real Estate Schulze arch. Ymere Architects Shell Vesteda Branding group Projectbureau EYE Noordwaarts Tolhuistuin teamCooperation when framing the aimsMonitor goals throughout processAlign rhetorical frames and action frames Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  32. 32. 32/57Goal 3: Local community participation 1 Questionnaire 2 Workshop programme Target group at Overhoeks AIM: frame socioeconomic and spatial needs Target group at Van der Pekbuurt and wishes of the local communities of Van der Area to create benefits Pekbuurt and Overhoeks Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  33. 33. RESEARCH URBAN DESIGN Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  34. 34. 34/57Urban design Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  35. 35. 35/57Three areas Residential area Facilities area Green area Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  36. 36. 36/57Phasing Phase 1 (2012) Phase 2 (2015) Phase 3 (flexible) Phase 1 2012 Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  37. 37. 37/57Phasing Phase 1 (2012) Phase 2 (2015) Phase 3 (flexible) Phase 2 2015 Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  38. 38. 38/57Phasing Phase 1 (2012) Phase 2 (2015) Phase 3 (flexible) Phase 3 flexible Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  39. 39. 39/57Phasing Phase 1 (2012) Phase 2 (2015) Phase 3 (flexible) Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  40. 40. 40/57Local effects of flagship development Benefits/opportunities Disadvantages/threats 1 Attention towards deprived communities 1 No public resources for deprived 2 Resident participation in planning flagship neighbourhoods projects 2 Residents distrust expences of government 3 Raising development activitiy in adjoining areas 3 Delay, curtailment, failure of projects 4 Inclusive aims of key actors 4 Individual planning, not integrated 1 More inclusive spaces 1 Fragmentation of cities 2 Provide possibilities for housing career 2 Social polarisation 3 Amenities 3 No public resources for deprived 4 Possibilities for transport neighbourhoods 5 Recreational facilities 4 Residents distrust expenses of government 6 Housing 5 Alien, unwelcoming appearance of flagship 7 Urban places area 8 Economic opportunities (jobs) 6 Delay, curtailment, failure of projects Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  41. 41. 41/57Design goals 1 More inclusive spacesGoal 1: Create social returns 2 Provide possibilities for housing career 3 Amenities 4 Possibilities for transportGoal 2: Housing career possibilities 5 Recreational facilities 6 Housing 7 Urban placesGoal 3: Amenities, facilities, transport 8 Jobs 9 Fragmentation of cities 10 Social polarisationGoal 4: Inclusive, outward focus 11 No public resources for deprived neighbourhoods 12 Residents distrust expenses of government 13 Alien, unwelcoming appearance of flagship areaGoal 5: Connect neighbourhoods 14 Delay, curtailment, failure of projects Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  42. 42. 42/57 € € € Goal 2: Housing career possibilities €350 social housing €550 €650 market rent for sale - mid prices for sale - high pricesGoal 1: Create socialreturns Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  43. 43. 43/57Goal 3: Facilities, amenities 1 2 5 6 3 housing companies 4 offices societal leisure retail gastronomy mix offices/housing Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  44. 44. 44/57Goal 4: Inclusive, outward focus Main attractors Sightline to main attractor Network of public squares Public green space Network of public places and sight lines to main attractors Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  45. 45. 45/57Goal 4: Inclusive, outward focusResidential block sight lines concept Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  46. 46. 46/57Goal 4: Inclusive, outward focus Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  47. 47. 47/57Goal 4: Inclusive, outward focus Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  48. 48. 48/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoods Aligning buildings Pedestrian-, cyclebridge Bridge (all traffic)Architecture Krierkohl Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  49. 49. 49/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoodsSection at canal between Overhoeks and Van der Pekbuurt Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  50. 50. 50/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoodsSection at canal between Overhoeks and Van der Pekbuurt Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  51. 51. 51/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoods Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  52. 52. 52/57Goal 5: Connect neighbourhoods Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  53. 53. CONCLUSIONS IMPLICATIONS & FUTURE RESEARCH Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  54. 54. 54/57ImplicationsAmsterdam Western Europe • Developers at Ymere, Vesteda and • Raise awareness Noordwaarts have shown their interest in the implementation of local benefits at • Show possible research method the area of Overhoeks. • Show possible altering of planning • Developers see their benefits in strategic process plan and thus implement local benefits better • Inspire urban designers on how to include mutual, local benefits • Urban designers can be inspired by the implementation of mutual, local benefits (ING RE no longer commissioner) Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  55. 55. 55/57Future research • Interview persons with most influence • Several case studies • Comparing planning processes Flagship development Context Problems & aim Benefits & disadvantages Strategic plan Urban design Implications
  56. 56. 56/57Recap...How the strategic plan and urban design can create mutual, local benefits between the residentialneighbourhood Van der Pekbuurt and the contemporary flagship area Overhoeks Amsterdam,in socioeconomic and spatial terms tegic Urban Stra design plan
  57. 57. Thank you!Questions? Presentation and thesis available online: www.slideshare.net/RobinBoelsums

×