Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Sl Knowledgemedia 210109mr


Published on

Presentation given at Aarhus University, Denmark as part of a Master Class on January 21st 2009.

Published in: Education, Technology

Sl Knowledgemedia 210109mr

  1. 1. Second Life as Knowledge Medium in Distance Education Marianne Riis, PhD Candidate, Aalborg University
  2. 2. <ul><li>Second Life is not a game ! </li></ul><ul><li>Second Life is a world – the resident (user) must create his/her own purpose for being in-world </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>“ Hallo, it’s 1’s and 0’s that disappear as soon as you unplug or loose your internet connection!” </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>So, is it possible to use Second Life </li></ul><ul><li>to share and create knowledge?? </li></ul>
  3. 3. <ul><li>PhD (2008-2010):3D-mediation as a supplement in problem based blended learning at the Master programme on ICT and Learning, MIL and in the COMBLE project </li></ul><ul><li>Respectful and radical remediation within Didactic Design </li></ul><ul><li>Action Research inspired approach  explain, understand but also change existing practice </li></ul>
  4. 4. Research design <ul><li>Multiple case study </li></ul><ul><li>MIL (re design/ </li></ul><ul><li>participation)  </li></ul><ul><li>3-4 cycles </li></ul><ul><li>Blended </li></ul><ul><li>COMBLE (design/ </li></ul><ul><li>participation)  </li></ul><ul><li>2 cycles </li></ul><ul><li>Online/Blended </li></ul><ul><li>+ </li></ul><ul><li>Continous multiple </li></ul><ul><li>in-world observations and interviews </li></ul>
  5. 5. The MIL-SL course <ul><li>Period :5 weeks (November/December) </li></ul><ul><li>Subject : Analysis of ICT and Didactic Design (course 1 out of 2) </li></ul><ul><li>Analytical object : Locations and processes in Second Life </li></ul><ul><li>Goals : identify, analyze, assess and reflect based on theory and practice  Think out-of-the-box </li></ul><ul><li>Participants: 12-15 students, 1 teacher, 2 guest lecturers and several guests </li></ul><ul><li>Mode : Blended (methods, tools and locations) </li></ul>
  6. 6. MIL’ing class ’08
  7. 8. FirstClass (FC) setting
  8. 9. Second Life (SL) setting <ul><li>Respectful office </li></ul><ul><li>Radical classroom </li></ul>
  9. 10. SL pics Fall’08
  10. 11. Get-off-to-a-good-start <ul><li>MI build </li></ul><ul><li>Connectivism course </li></ul>
  11. 12. 25 scheduled activities (1-3 hrs.) <ul><li>Get-off-to-a-good-start </li></ul><ul><li>Building class </li></ul><ul><li>Didactic Design Discussions </li></ul><ul><li>Visits (education and business) </li></ul><ul><li>Friday Bar </li></ul><ul><li>Your Tour </li></ul><ul><li>X-Mas celebration </li></ul><ul><li>Ad hoc meetings </li></ul>
  12. 13. Building Class
  13. 14. Quantitative outcome (1) <ul><li>12 students participated full time , 1 student analyzed SL and GC and 2 students participated ad hoc </li></ul><ul><li>There were 25 scheduled activities lasting between 1-3 hrs. The students were expected to participate in 1 – all of them participated in several </li></ul><ul><li>The meta-conference in FC contained 232 postings (5 weeks) … </li></ul>
  14. 15. Didactic Design Discussions
  15. 16. Quantitative outcome (2) <ul><li>FC discussion postings: </li></ul><ul><li>Didactics and target groups – 32 postings by 12 students and me (8). Approx. 40 A4 pages. </li></ul><ul><li>Orientation and navigation – 8 postings by 5 students and me (1). Approx. 8 A4 pages. </li></ul><ul><li>Interaction – 0 posts! </li></ul><ul><li>Learning processes – 68 posting by 11 students and me (21). Approx. 83 A4 pages. </li></ul><ul><li>Audio-visuals – 9 postings by 2 students and me (4). Approx. 15 A4 pages.  almost 10 (3) postings pr. student (146 pages (36) ) </li></ul>
  16. 17. Danish educational visits <ul><li>Percipitopia </li></ul><ul><li>- SDU </li></ul><ul><li>WD’s holodeck </li></ul><ul><li>- Wonderful Denmark </li></ul>
  17. 18. Qualitative outcome (1) <ul><li>SL learning curve is very steep </li></ul><ul><li>Takes a lot of time, practice and patience </li></ul><ul><li>SL is still an emerging technology </li></ul><ul><li>Huge potential but too time consuming at this point </li></ul><ul><li>Considerations about target groups are important – teacher/facilitator crucial </li></ul><ul><li>Any pedagogical strategy can be used – all work with different purposes </li></ul>
  18. 19. International educational visits <ul><li>Rockcliffe University </li></ul><ul><li>- Canada </li></ul><ul><li>Metaverse Labs </li></ul><ul><li>- Israel </li></ul>
  19. 20. Qualitative outcome (2) <ul><li>A very social and personal environment </li></ul><ul><li>International/inter-cultural </li></ul><ul><li>Immersive and augmented depending on goals and processes </li></ul><ul><li>Avatar-mediation can be very fruitful, but also has some disadvantages </li></ul><ul><li>Communication and dissemination possibilities not good enough … yet </li></ul><ul><li>Don’t dismiss anything before trying – don’t judge a book by it’s cover! </li></ul>
  20. 21. International debate visits <ul><li>Metanomics </li></ul><ul><li>Science Friday </li></ul>
  21. 22. Flexibility in Distance Education? <ul><li>SL lacks sufficient asynchronous communication possibilities </li></ul><ul><li>At MIL synchronous communication is rarely used between teachers and students in the course periods – rationale: flexibility </li></ul><ul><li>MIL’s SL-course emphasized synchronous communication possibly creating a Rosenthal (pygmalion) effect! </li></ul>
  22. 23. SL entreprenuers <ul><li>Pop Art Lab </li></ul><ul><li>(non-profit) </li></ul><ul><li>Electric Pixels </li></ul><ul><li>(profit) </li></ul>
  23. 24. Friday Bar
  24. 25. Your Tour <ul><li>Genome Island </li></ul><ul><li>FLS </li></ul>
  25. 26. Student creations <ul><li>A conceptual model </li></ul><ul><li>(Cement Canning) </li></ul><ul><li>A photostory </li></ul><ul><li>(Halis Luminos) </li></ul>
  26. 27. Yes! SL can be used as Knowledge Medium
  27. 29. Future changes … <ul><li>Earlier (more focused) course start, includes rethinking f2f-seminar </li></ul><ul><li>Change assessment criteria </li></ul><ul><li>Limit activities (2-3/week)? + audio/video recordings </li></ul><ul><li>Annotate relevant places (SL pics) and references </li></ul><ul><li>Qualify entrance (SL tutors and Danish OI) </li></ul><ul><li>Qualify visits (planned dialogue) </li></ul><ul><li>Qualify Didactic Design Discussions (one for each element + ad hoc topics based on students’ interests) </li></ul><ul><li>Amplify use of student-knowledge (tours, teach each other) </li></ul><ul><li>Rethink building class concept </li></ul><ul><li>Rethink FC structure and use </li></ul><ul><li>(SLoodle  COMBLE) </li></ul>
  28. 30. Thx! <ul><li>Marianne Riis/ </li></ul><ul><li>Mariis Mills </li></ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul>