Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Flipping the Makerspace to Maximize Active Learning Time in Introductory Workshops

1,869 views

Published on

A flipped, active learning teaching method not only makes efficient use of limited makerspace time and space but also allows participants to work through instructional materials at their own pace before a flipped makerspace workshop. This is done by devoting face-to-face workshop time to hands-on activities, moving most of the instruction into online modules to be completed before the session starts. This contrasts with a common makerspace pedagogy of peer-to-peer instruction or assistance, which “takes advantage of the student-run aspect by creating a comfortable environment taught by peers”. While in many instances the individual peer-to-peer instruction is the preferred way to meet the needs of makerspace users, in the case of students without previous makerspace experience, workshops that don’t require a routine commitment can be a great introduction without the perception of any commitment beyond the workshop.

A flipped, active learning teaching method where face-to-face time is devoted to hands-on activities in makerspace workshops, and most instruction is completed online before the session, not only makes efficient use of limited makerspace time and space but also allows participants to work through the pre-workshops materials at their own pace.

In order to better understand student perceptions of the flipped makerspace workshop format, we conducted follow up surveys after every introductory workshop in order to answer the following research questions:

RQ1: What are student satisfaction levels for introductory makerspace workshops taught using a flipped, active learning teaching method?
RQ2: Do students value being able to work at their own pace in flipped active learning workshops?
RQ3: Would students prefer peer tutoring over a flipped workshop to be introduced to a new technology?
RQ4: Are there any differences based on the faculty students belong to?

* An International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces presentation at Case Western Reserve University (2017).

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Flipping the Makerspace to Maximize Active Learning Time in Introductory Workshops

  1. 1. Flipping the Makerspace to Maximize Active Learning Time in Introductory Workshops Rich McCue - rmccue@uvic.ca Twitter: @richmccue https://oac.uvic.ca/dsc/
  2. 2. Flipped Learning Teaching Method
  3. 3. Flipping Reduced Time Makerspace is Tied up with Workshops
  4. 4. How Do Students Feel About Flipped Makerspace Workshops?
  5. 5. Research Questions: ➔RQ1: What are student satisfaction levels for introductory makerspace workshops taught using a flipped, active learning teaching method? ➔RQ2: Do students value being able to work at their own pace in flipped active learning workshops? ➔RQ3: Would students prefer peer tutoring over a flipped workshop to be introduced to a new technology?
  6. 6. UVic Libraries Makerspace Background...
  7. 7. Share Tools
  8. 8. Introductory Workshops
  9. 9. Results
  10. 10. Participation Rates
  11. 11. RQ1: What are student satisfaction levels for introductory makerspace workshops taught using a flipped, active learning teaching method?
  12. 12. RQ2: Do students value being able to work at their own pace in flipped active learning workshops?
  13. 13. RQ3: Would students prefer peer tutoring over a flipped workshop to be introduced to a new technology?
  14. 14. Conclusions
  15. 15. Active Learning
  16. 16. Choice of Activities & Pacing
  17. 17. Limitations & Future Research ❏Larger sample sizes needed to draw more definitive conclusions. ❏Qualitative interviews or focus groups to explore questions raised by the survey.
  18. 18. Rich McCue - rmccue@uvic.ca @richmccue https://oac.uvic.ca/dsc/ Questions, Comments, and/or Suggestions?

×