Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Resourcd File

133 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Resourcd File

  1. 1. AS Sociology: ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK SHEET: 20 Marker Assessment Question: S/A Mark Grade P/A Mark Grade AO1 Knowledge and Understanding Range of Material Detail Organisation & Structure 9 - 10 Accurate -Relevant and focused of the question Reasonably detailed – Good coverage of relevant studies Appropriate selection - Addresses both breadth and depth Clear& coherent presentation - Main issues addressed and contained. Few syntax and spelling errors 7 - 8 Generally accurate Good focus of the question Less detailed - reasonable coverage of relevant studies Some evidence of selection - Breadth and depth for at least one side/area Appropriate presentation - Mostly accurate and relevant . Some spelling and syntax errors; Good use of terminology 5 - 6 Basic description Some development in statements. Lacking detail /muddled Some coherence Little evidence of selection Breadth but not depth - mostly descriptive partly inappropriate presentation - Frequent errors of spelling and grammar 1 - 4 Very brief or flawed Brief answers Simple statements Very basic Inappropriate material Inappropriate presentation - High incidence of spelling and syntax errors AO2 Relevance of material presented Evaluation of research Range of issues/evidence OR depth of issues/evidence Expression of ideas & use of specialist terms QWC 9 - 10 Effective use of material/ Supported by factual material Effective evaluation - Reasoned argument and judgement relevant to the question Broad range of issues/evidence or narrow range but in depth - Good use of evidence and theoretical debate Clearexpression of ideas & good range of specialist terms - Good organisation and clarity. Few errors 7 - 8 Material is not always used effectively - Points made may not have been fully evaluated. Reasonable evaluation - Range of evidence and references to contrasting theories Limited depth/narrower range in greater depth - some evidence of judgement and reaching conclusions, Reasonable expression of ideas and a range of specialist terms - Effective extended writing but lapses in organisation Some errors 5 - 6 basic commentary Some use of key terms Basic evaluation - Some attempt at analysis/evaluation with limited success Superficial /restricted range of issues and/or evidence - Limited evidence presented Expression of ideas lacks clarity and organisation. Some specialist terms Errors detract from clarity 1 - 4 rudimentary commentary No skills present Barely any evaluation - Little attempt at analysis/evaluation Very basic consideration of evidence/ - Lack of relevant evidence Expression of ideas poor, few specialist terms used - Lacks clarity and organisation Error obscure meaning Name: Form: Target Grade
  2. 2. Now go to your progress book and set yourself targets AO1 = /10 AO2 = /10 Mark /20 Grade = At Target Above Target Below Target What went well Teacher Feedback Even better if ……. Student Response to feedback

×