1. RESEARCH AND EVALUATION
ON A DIME
Religion Communicators Council
2015 National Convention
Alexandria, Virginia
Douglas F. Cannon, Ph.D., APR+M, Fellow PRSA
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
April 10, 2015
2. WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION
Research is fundamental to public relations
planning and evaluation. Religion communicators
often say they don’t have the time, money or
background for research. This session looks at
simple, cheap methods—qualitative and
quantitative, primary and secondary—for
gathering information about publics and
communication effects. Communicators can use
these techniques to determine realistic
objectives, plan programs, assess results and
demonstrate effectiveness.
3. Topics
Introduction
• What’s research? What’s evaluation?
• Why do we research? Why evaluate?
• Research and religion communicators
• 4-step public relations process
Research
• Types of research
• Secondary research
• Research techniques
• Primary qualitative, quantitative research tools
Evaluation
• Things to evaluate
• Basic evaluation questions
• Measurement levels
6. What’s Evaluation?
• Judging results against agreed-upon
objectives established during planning
• Determining value of effort
7. Why do research?
• To learn about, understand or assess
situations
• To gather information about publics
• To gauge public opinion, track issues, monitor
industry trends
• To test ideas, plans, messages, products
• To monitor, evaluate progress or feedback
• To make decisions, prepare for planning
• To generate publicity
8. Why Evaluate?
• To judge effects, outcomes
• To determine value of what you did
• To maintain accountability
• To document contributions to your
organization
• To learn from successes, failures
• To provide information for future efforts
9. When to research?
• Continuously: Environmental scanning
• Before a campaign
• Assess problem
• Assess publics
• Assess media, social climate
• During a campaign
• Implementation checking
• In-progress monitoring
• Benchmarking
• After a campaign
• Evaluate outputs
• Evaluate outcomes
10. Research & religion communicators
I conduct communication audits to identify
communication problems between the
organization and various publics.
• 2006: 1.96/5 (n=115)
• 2011: 1.98/5 (n=150)
• 2013: 1.72/5 (n=46)
11. Research & religion communicators
I report public opinion survey results to keep
management informed of the opinions of
various publics.
• 2006: 2.96/5 (n=115)
• 2011: 2.34/5 (n=150)
• 2013: 1.67/5 (n=46)
15. Types of PR research
• Secondary: Information gathered by
others
• Primary: Information gathered firsthand
• Qualitative: impressions
• Quantitative: numbers
16. Secondary research
• Search engines: Google Scholar, Google, Yahoo
• Research organizations
• Gallup (http://www.gallup.com)
• Pew Research Center (Religion and Public Life) (http://www.pewforum.org/)
• Institute for Public Relations (http://www.instituteforpr.org/)
• The Association of Religion Data Archives (http://www.thearda.com/)
• Academic journals
• Public Relations Journal (http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/)
• Research Journal of the IPR (http://www.instituteforpr.org/research-journal/)
• Journal of Public Relations Research
• Public Relations Review
• Trade publications/blogs
• Mr. Magazine (https://mrmagazine.wordpress.com/)
• Bulldog Reporter’s Daily Dog (https://www.bulldogreporter.com/dailydog)
• CommPRO (http://www.commpro.biz)
• Ragan’s PR Daily (http://www.prdaily.com)
• RTDNA Daily (http://rtdna.org/)
17. Other sources
• University departments, schools, colleges
• Advertising
• Communication
• Journalism
• Mass Communication
• Public Relations
• University agencies
• Bradley Public Relations, Brigham Young University (http://www.bradleypr.com/)
• Cardinal Communication, Ball State University (http://cardinalcomm.org/blog/)
• Center for Communication Research, Texas Tech University
(http://www.depts.ttu.edu/comc/ccr/index.php)
• Lindsey + Asp Advertising + Public Relations, University of Oklahoma
(http://www.lindseyandasp.com/)
• The Plank Center for Leadership in Public Relations, University of Alabama
(http://plankcenter.ua.edu/)
24. Evaluation
• Measurement: Using metrics tied to
objectives (quantitative)
• Assessment: Judging success, failure
(qualitative)
• Evaluation: Determining value (Were
results worth the effort?) (qualitative)
25. Things to evaluate
• Preparation (research, planning)
• Implementation (execution)
• Output (messages, efforts)
• Outcomes (immediate results compared to
objectives)
• Outgrowths (long-term or societal changes)
26. Basic Evaluation Questions
• Adequately planned?
• Message(s) understood?
• How could strategy have been more effective?
• Audiences reached?
• Objectives achieved?
• What was unforeseen?
• Budget met?
• Future improvements?
28. Message-Exposure Measures
• Clippings/mentions
• Media impressions
(Placement x circulation/viewership/listenership)
• Internet hits, likes, follows, retweets
• Requests for information
• Systematic tracking/online analytics
(Analyze volume and content of media placements or online
engagement)
• Advertising equivalency (not acceptable)
(Space/time x advertising rate)
29. Summary
Introduction
• What’s research? What’s evaluation?
• Why do we research? Why evaluate?
• Research and religion communicators
• 4-step public relations process
Research
• Types of research
• Secondary research
• Research techniques
• Primary qualitative, quantitative research tools
Evaluation
• Things to evaluate
• Basic evaluation questions
• Measurement levels