Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Corporate PresentationJune 2013
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTForward Looking InformationThis Presentation contains ‘‘forward-looking information’’ within the meani...
3 Significant high-grade gold resource:Valley of the Kings8.5 M oz gold Indicated (16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t gold)2.9 M oz gold ...
Kirkland Lake Mine(Kirkland Lake)Kensington Mine(Coeur)Casa Berardi(Aurizon)El Penon Mine(Yamana)Red Lake Mine(Goldcorp)Po...
5BRUCEJACK PROJECT LOCATION220kmTerrace
EXPLORATION AND OWNERSHIP HISTORY1960-19801980-19851986-1989199019931999-2000200920102011-20122013Exploration byvariouscom...
BRUCEJACK GEOLOGY/DRILLING7Meters500Valley of the KingsWest Zone
8MAIN MINERALIZED DOMAINSWest ZoneUndergroundDevelopmentBulkSampleNSDomain 17 Domain 11200 mCategory Tonnes(mil)Gold(g/t)S...
VALLEY OF THE KINGS INDICATED RESOURCENorthing(± 25 m)Ind.Gold*(Oz.)6258225 230,9006258175 484,0006258125 703,1006258075 3...
MINERAL RESOURCE CONTINUITY10Total Ounces* per 10 x 100 m N-S corridor – 6257800 N Long SectionLevel (m) Ind. Gold (Oz)*15...
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS11Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEqValley of the Kings block model – 4265...
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS12Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEqValley of the Kings block model – 4266...
1313100 mCONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSValley of the Kings block model plan view - 1300m level (50m thick)
1410,000-TONNE BULK SAMPLE (Q2/Q3)N S0.5-5.0 g/t AuEq5.0-15.0 g/t AuEq>15.0 g/t AuEqKeyWest ZoneUndergroundDevelopmentVall...
BULK SAMPLE: SECTION 42662515SN
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION16Vertical viewing window ±30 m1345 m Level5-1010-2020-60>60Key (g/t AuEq)2.5-51-2.50.3-1
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION175-1010-2020-60>60Key (g/t AuEq)2.5-51-2.50.3-11345 m LevelVertical viewing window ±8.5 mPolylithic C...
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION185-1010-2020-60>60Key (g/t AuEq)Only Indicated blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq shown1345 m LevelVertic...
BULK SAMPLE PROCESS(1)19Typical sample tower flowsheetSource: Strathcona Mineral Services Limited, Meladine Project Proce...
UNDERGROUND DRILLING20SNTypical Section – Fan DrillingDetailed underground drilling at <15 meter centers to outline 700,00...
VISIBLE GOLD STRINGERS IN STOCKWORK21
2222 Corridors of high-grade visiblegold seams within lower grade(5g/t to 20g/t) gold quartzstockwork Steeply dipping or...
PROPOSED MINE DEVELOPMENT23Oblique View of Mining Stopes, Valley of the KingsSN100 mWest-Zone(late mine life)Valley of the...
MINE AND MILL SITE LAYOUTCrushingGrindingGravity Concentrate CircuitDoré (50%-60% of goldproduction)Flotation Concentrate ...
BRUCEJACK PROJECT ECONOMICS25(1) Source: Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment ofthe Brucejack Proj...
2013 BRUCEJACK PROJECT PLANS26H1 2013 Completed access ramp to Valley of the Kings Underground sampling/drilling Valley ...
BRUCEJACK PHOTOS27Recently-completed bridge Husky 8Sample Tower assembly May 2013
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT28 Pretivm’s management team has beencooperatively engaging with First Nationsand local community lea...
BRUCEJACK PERMITTING291986198919931998199920062011-20122013201420152016ReclamationPermitMine DevelopmentCertificate issued...
PRETIVM MANAGEMENT30Robert Quartermain, B.Sc., M.Sc., P.Geo, D.Sc.President & Chief Executive Officer,DirectorPeter de Vis...
SHAREHOLDING & ANALYST COVERAGE31Institutions,53%Retail, 23%Management,5%SilverStandard,19%Capital Structure(1)Public Floa...
HIGH-GRADE GOLD PRODUCTION32MeadowBank(Agnico Eagle)Laronde(Agnico Eagle)Hycroft (Allied Nevada)Kemess (Aurico)Casa Berard...
CONTACTPhone: 604-558-1784Fax: 604-558-4784Toll-free: 1-877-558-1784invest@pretivm.comwww.pretivm.comHEAD OFFICEPretium Re...
APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK COMPARATIVE GEOCHRONOLOGY34
APPENDIX: GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION35~192-188 MaActive island arcPorphyry-related hydrothermal systemInitial mineralizationTele...
APPENDIX: GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION36Cretaceous deformation at ~110 MaUplift and erosionValley of the KingsWaning of porphyry s...
APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK AREA GEOLOGY37>0.3 g/t gold500mExisting 5km underground workings1980-1994 – Newhawk908 DDH/120,000m200...
APPENDIX: VALLEY OF THE KINGS GOLD GRADE38Valley of the Kings – Indicated Resource grade consistencyResource Estimate(Snow...
APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK GEOLOGY CROSS SECTION39
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

June 6, Corporate Presentation

8,091 views

Published on

Published in: Investor Relations, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

June 6, Corporate Presentation

  1. 1. Corporate PresentationJune 2013
  2. 2. CAUTIONARY STATEMENTForward Looking InformationThis Presentation contains ‘‘forward-looking information’’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities LitigationReform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information may include, but is not limited to, information with respect to the anticipated production and developments in our operationsin future periods, our planned exploration and development activities, the adequacy of our financial resources, the estimation of mineral resources, realization of mineral resourceestimates, costs and timing of development of the projects we currently intend to acquire (the “Projects”), costs and timing of future exploration, results of future exploration anddrilling, timing and receipt of approvals, consents and permits under applicable legislation, our executive compensation approach and practice, the composition of our board ofdirectors and committees, and adequacy of financial resources. Wherever possible, words such as ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘expects’’ or ‘‘does not expect’’, ‘‘budget’’, ‘‘scheduled’’, ‘‘estimates’’,‘‘forecasts’’, ‘‘anticipate’’ or ‘‘does not anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘intend’’ and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results ‘‘may’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘would’’,‘‘might’’ or ‘‘will’’ be taken, occur or be achieved, have been used to identify forward-looking information. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemedto constitute forward-looking information to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed. Any statements thatexpress or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always,using words or phrases such as ‘‘expects’’, ‘‘anticipates’’, ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘projects’’, ‘‘estimates’’, ‘‘assumes’’, ‘‘intends’’, ‘‘strategy’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘potential’’ or variationsthereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results ‘‘may’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘would’’, ‘‘might’’ or ‘‘will’’ be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms andsimilar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of known and unknownrisks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Many of these risksare listed and described in our final short-form prospectus dated March 19, 2012 (the “Prospectus”), which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com under our profile.Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may beother factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results andfuture events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Forward-looking information involves statements about the future and is inherently uncertain,and our actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information due to a variety of risks,uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in the Prospectus under the heading ‘‘Risk Factors’’. Our forward-looking information is based onthe beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking information, whetheras a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, prospective investors should not place unduereliance on forward-looking information.National Instrument 43-101Technical and scientific information contained herein relating to the Projects is derived from National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) compliant technical reports (“Reports”)“Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project” dated February 20, 2012 “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated April3, 2012, “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated September 18, 2012 and “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated November 20, 2012. We have filed theReports under our profile at www.sedar.com. Technical and scientific information not contained within the Reports for the Projects have been prepared under the supervision ofMr. Kenneth C. McNaughton, an independent “qualified person” under NI 43-101.This presentation uses the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” (together “M&I”) and “inferred resources”. Although these terms are recognized and required byCanadian regulations (under NI 43-101), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves donot have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,marketing, or other relevant issues. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves.In addition, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of aninferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or prefeasibility studies, or economic studies, except for a Preliminary Assessment as defined under NI 43-101. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferredresource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.CurrencyUnless otherwise indicated, all dollar values herein are in Canadian $.2
  3. 3. 3 Significant high-grade gold resource:Valley of the Kings8.5 M oz gold Indicated (16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t gold)2.9 M oz gold Inferred (5.4 Mt @ 17.0 g/t gold) Located in British Columbia, Canada Underground feasibility study June 2013 Commercial production target early 2016An investment in Gold
  4. 4. Kirkland Lake Mine(Kirkland Lake)Kensington Mine(Coeur)Casa Berardi(Aurizon)El Penon Mine(Yamana)Red Lake Mine(Goldcorp)Pogo Mine(Sumitomo)Valley of theKingsF2 Deposit(Rubicon)Buritica(Continental)Cerro Negro(Goldcorp)Eleonore(Goldcorp)Cerro Moro(Yamana)0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.018.00.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0M&I+InferredGoldGrade(g/t)M&I + Inferred Gold Resources (mm oz)HIGH-GRADE GOLD WITH SIZE4November 2012 Valley of the Kings High-Grade Gold Mineral Resource based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne.Data sources: Intierra Ltd., NRH.Indicated Gold:8.5 mm oz @ 16.4 g/t AuInferred Gold:2.9 mm oz @ 17.0 g/t Au
  5. 5. 5BRUCEJACK PROJECT LOCATION220kmTerrace
  6. 6. EXPLORATION AND OWNERSHIP HISTORY1960-19801980-19851986-1989199019931999-2000200920102011-20122013Exploration byvariouscompaniesWest Zone discoveryand definitionby Newhawk5.3 kmundergrounddevelopment ofWest ZoneWest ZoneFeasibility StudycompletedAcquisition bySilver StandardResources Inc.Exploration resumes.Discovery of Valley ofthe Kings ZoneAcquisition byPretivmExtensive explorationprogram, high-graderesource, exploration roadMine DevelopmentCertificate issuedValley of the Kingsunderground bulk sample andfeasibility study6
  7. 7. BRUCEJACK GEOLOGY/DRILLING7Meters500Valley of the KingsWest Zone
  8. 8. 8MAIN MINERALIZED DOMAINSWest ZoneUndergroundDevelopmentBulkSampleNSDomain 17 Domain 11200 mCategory Tonnes(mil)Gold(g/t)Silver(g/t)Contained(3)Gold(mil oz)Silver(mil oz)Indicated 16.1 16.4 14.2 8.5 7.3Inferred(2)5.4 17.0 15.7 2.9 2.7Valley of the Kings Mineral Resource Estimate– November 2012(1,4,5)(Based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne)(1) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economicviability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental,permitting, legal, marketing, or other relevant issues. The Mineral Resources in this newsrelease were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum(CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelinesprepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIMCouncil.(2) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain innature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as anIndicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result inupgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.(3) Contained metal may differ due to rounding.(4) The Mineral Resource estimate is defined using 5 m by 5 by 5 m blocks in the well drilledportion of West Zone (5 m by 10 m drilling or better) and 10 m by 10 m by 10 m blocks in theremainder of West Zone and in Valley of the Kings.(5) The gold equivalent value is defined as AuEq=Au + Ag/53
  9. 9. VALLEY OF THE KINGS INDICATED RESOURCENorthing(± 25 m)Ind.Gold*(Oz.)6258225 230,9006258175 484,0006258125 703,1006258075 336,6006258025 1,951,1006257975 2,365,9006257925 1,021,0006257875 513,6006257825 687,5006257775 176,400Total Ounces per 100 m Easting and 50 m Northing stripsValley of the KingsIndicated Mineral Resource:8.5 Moz. Au @ 5.0 g/t AuEq.(16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t Au)*Nov. 2012 Indicated Mineral Resource;≥5.0 g/t AuEq.91,092,100 1,776,900 1,467,600 2,185,800 1,391,000 380,100 192,900 Ind. Au* (Oz.)
  10. 10. MINERAL RESOURCE CONTINUITY10Total Ounces* per 10 x 100 m N-S corridor – 6257800 N Long SectionLevel (m) Ind. Gold (Oz)*1540-1570 116,3001510-1540 499,7001480-1510 734,8001450-1480 510,4001420-1450 365,4501390-1420 566,7001360-1390 631,7001330-1360 364,8001300-1330 527,4001270-1300 992,0001240-1270 998,2001210-1240 521,9501180-1210 213,0501150-1180 246,8001120-1150 294,6001090-1120 393,9001060-1090 317,600W E100 m4,000-6,0006,000-7,0007,000-8,000>10,000Key (Oz. Au)3,000-4,0001,000-3,000<1,0008,000-10,000Total Ounces per level(Valley of Kings Zone)*Nov. 2012 Indicated Mineral Resource;≥5.0 g/t AuEq.
  11. 11. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS11Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEqValley of the Kings block model – 426550E section view East (50m wide)
  12. 12. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS12Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEqValley of the Kings block model – 426600E section view East (50m wide)
  13. 13. 1313100 mCONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSValley of the Kings block model plan view - 1300m level (50m thick)
  14. 14. 1410,000-TONNE BULK SAMPLE (Q2/Q3)N S0.5-5.0 g/t AuEq5.0-15.0 g/t AuEq>15.0 g/t AuEqKeyWest ZoneUndergroundDevelopmentValley of theKings BulkSample200 m546 m100 m 200 m 300 m400 m500 mCompleted 546-meter ramp from the West Zone to Valley of the Kings to extract bulk sample.
  15. 15. BULK SAMPLE: SECTION 42662515SN
  16. 16. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION16Vertical viewing window ±30 m1345 m Level5-1010-2020-60>60Key (g/t AuEq)2.5-51-2.50.3-1
  17. 17. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION175-1010-2020-60>60Key (g/t AuEq)2.5-51-2.50.3-11345 m LevelVertical viewing window ±8.5 mPolylithic ConglomerateFragmentalVolcanic RocksIntenselySilicifiedConglomerateHbl-phyricLatite FlowSiltstone, litharenite,pebble conglomerate
  18. 18. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION185-1010-2020-60>60Key (g/t AuEq)Only Indicated blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq shown1345 m LevelVertical viewing window ±8.5 mPolylithic ConglomerateFragmentalVolcanic RocksIntenselySilicifiedConglomerateHbl-phyricLatite FlowSiltstone, litharenite,pebble conglomerate
  19. 19. BULK SAMPLE PROCESS(1)19Typical sample tower flowsheetSource: Strathcona Mineral Services Limited, Meladine Project Process flowsheet summary: Crosscut rounds of 100 tonnes transported tosurface Crushing to ¾ inch, then to ½ inch Run through on-site sample tower 120 kilograms in 4 samples are sent for testing Remainder (99.8 tonnes) shipped for processingto produce gold Representivity testing: Representative of drillhole density that informsthe Indicated Mineral Resource Representative of average grade of IndicatedResource and the global resource for Valley ofthe Kings Representative of style of mineralization for therest of Valley of the Kings(1) Strathcona Mineral Services Ltd is independent QP for Valley of the Kings bulk sample
  20. 20. UNDERGROUND DRILLING20SNTypical Section – Fan DrillingDetailed underground drilling at <15 meter centers to outline 700,000 ounces of gold.N
  21. 21. VISIBLE GOLD STRINGERS IN STOCKWORK21
  22. 22. 2222 Corridors of high-grade visiblegold seams within lower grade(5g/t to 20g/t) gold quartzstockwork Steeply dipping ore body Competent ground conditions Stope widths (15m wide X 30mhigh) appropriate both fortransverse and longitudinallayouts Cost effectiveFirst 50 meters of Valley of the Kings rampLong hole stoping mining method:MINING METHOD FOR STOCKWORK
  23. 23. PROPOSED MINE DEVELOPMENT23Oblique View of Mining Stopes, Valley of the KingsSN100 mWest-Zone(late mine life)Valley of the Kings
  24. 24. MINE AND MILL SITE LAYOUTCrushingGrindingGravity Concentrate CircuitDoré (50%-60% of goldproduction)Flotation Concentrate CircuitOff-take (40%-50% ofgold production)Flowsheet Summary: Dore bars produced on site,shipped to gold refinery Flotation concentrate (~300tpd) shipped to Stewartthen sea transportWest ZoneValley of the Kings24
  25. 25. BRUCEJACK PROJECT ECONOMICS25(1) Source: Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment ofthe Brucejack Project, effective date February 20, 2012(2) Base case metals prices of US$1,100 /oz gold and US$21/oz silverPEA is based on Mineral Resource estimates for the Valley of the Kings andWest Zone effective November 28, 2011 which are now out-of-date.February 2012 Preliminary EconomicAssessment Results(1,2) :Processing rate 1,500 tpdMine life 24 yearsTotal gold production 6.9 million ozAverage annual goldproduction (Yrs 1-12)325,000 ouncesCapex US$436.3 millionTotal operating costs C$170.90/t milledInternal Rate ofReturn29.8%Net Present Value(5% discount)US$2.262 billion Processing rate increased 2,700 tonnes per day Mill facilities streamlined Flotation concentrate to be sold to3rd parties rather than refined onsite Capex and Opex savings, reducedproject footprint Metallurgy continues to be positive Feasibility metallurgical studiesconfirm gold recoveries 98%, silverrecoveries 92%Feasibility Study Refinements to PEA:
  26. 26. 2013 BRUCEJACK PROJECT PLANS26H1 2013 Completed access ramp to Valley of the Kings Underground sampling/drilling Valley of theKings Commence 10,000-tonne underground bulksample from Valley of the Kings Feasibility study completedH2 2013 Complete bulk sample report Process bulk sample File Environmental Assessment CertificateApplication Resource update Valley of the Kings drilling
  27. 27. BRUCEJACK PHOTOS27Recently-completed bridge Husky 8Sample Tower assembly May 2013
  28. 28. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT28 Pretivm’s management team has beencooperatively engaging with First Nationsand local community leaders in theStewart, BC region for over 10 years We work to ensure that ourcommunication about the progress of theBrucejack Project is open and continuous Commercial relationships with local FirstNations developed during the explorationphase at Brucejack have been mutuallysuccessful We will continue to extend bothcommercial contract and employmentopportunities to locals whenever possibleStewart warehouse constructed by developmentcorporation of Skii km Lax Ha First Nation
  29. 29. BRUCEJACK PERMITTING291986198919931998199920062011-20122013201420152016ReclamationPermitMine DevelopmentCertificate issuedApril 15, 1993Project AssessmentCertificatePermitted forexploration andexploration roadProject AssessmentCertificate allowed toexpireApproval in principlefor development of amine at West ZoneReclamationCompletionProject Descriptionunder review forunderground mine atBrucejack’s Valley ofthe Kings Brucejack Lake is not fish habitat Waste rock from 1980’s/1990’sunderground development was depositedin Brucejack Lake as part of 1999reclamation More than 50% of tailings (targeting 60%) tobe used for paste backfill and depositedunderground, with remainder of tailings tobe deposited in bottom 30 meters ofBrucejack LakeAnticipateEnvironmentalAssessment CertificateConstruction,commissioningCommercialproduction target
  30. 30. PRETIVM MANAGEMENT30Robert Quartermain, B.Sc., M.Sc., P.Geo, D.Sc.President & Chief Executive Officer,DirectorPeter de Visser, CAChief Financial OfficerJoseph Ovsenek, B.A. Sc., P.Eng., LLBVice President & Chief Development Officer,DirectorKen McNaughton, M.A. Sc., P.Eng.Vice President & Chief Exploration OfficerIan I Chang, M.A. Sc., P.Eng.Vice President, Project DevelopmentMichelle Romero, B.A., M.L.S.Director, Corporate RelationsKevin Torpy, B.Sc.Director, Mine EngineeringWarwick Board, Ph.D., P.Geo.Chief GeologistMax Holtby, B.Sc., P. Geo.Director, PermittingAndrew Saltis, I.Eng.Site Project Manager, Mine Manager
  31. 31. SHAREHOLDING & ANALYST COVERAGE31Institutions,53%Retail, 23%Management,5%SilverStandard,19%Capital Structure(1)Public Float 83.3Silver Standard Shares 19.0Total Issued & Outstanding Shares 102.3Incentive Options 8.5Total Fully Diluted Shares 110.8Market Capitalization C$706 millionWorking Capital (at March 31, 2013) C$22.5 millionShare Offering gross proceeds (atApril 26, 2013) (3)C$40 million(1) As of June 5, 2013; ownership calculated on an undiluted basis.(2) As of June 5, 2013. Source: IPREO, SEDI(3) See new release dated April 26, 2013(shares in millions)Top Shareholders(2)(shares in millions)Silver Standard Resources 18.986Royce & Associates 10.689Passport Capital 5.927Liberty Metals & Mining 5.780Robert Quartermain 2.853TD Asset Management 2.153Sun Valley Gold LLC 2.018Sprott Asset Management 1.686Connor Clark & Lunn 1.590Carmignac Gestion 1.562Analyst CoverageBMO John HayesCIBC Jeff KilleenCitibank Alex HackingCormark Securities Richard GrayCowen Securities Adam GrafGlobal Hunter Securities Jeff WrightGMP Securities George AlbinoRBC Dan RollinsSalman Partners Ash GuglaniScotiabank Ovais HabibVery Independent Research John Tumazos
  32. 32. HIGH-GRADE GOLD PRODUCTION32MeadowBank(Agnico Eagle)Laronde(Agnico Eagle)Hycroft (Allied Nevada)Kemess (Aurico)Casa Berardi Mine(Aurizon Mines)Ruby Hill (Barrick)Round Mountain(Barrick/Kinross)Turqouise Ridge(Barrick/Newmont)Red Lake(Goldcorp)Musselwhite(Goldcorp)Marigold Mine(GoldCorp/Barrick)Fort Knox (Kinross)Kirkland Lake(Kirkland Lake Gold)Mesquite (NewGold)Carlin (Newmont)Canadian Malartic(Osisko) Valley of the Kings(Pretium)Detour Lake Mine(Detour Gold)01002003004005006007000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18AnnualGoldProduction(Koz/year)Grade (g/t)Average gold production vs. grade for various North Americanproducing mines with >2Moz AuData sources: Companies, NRH.Production target:400k-500k oz/year@ 14g/t -15g/t head grade
  33. 33. CONTACTPhone: 604-558-1784Fax: 604-558-4784Toll-free: 1-877-558-1784invest@pretivm.comwww.pretivm.comHEAD OFFICEPretium Resources Inc.570 Granville St.Suite 1600Vancouver, BCCanada V6C 3P1COMMON SHARESTSX/NYSE:PVGIssued: 102 millionFully diluted: 110.8 million52-week hi/low: $16.37/$5.53Market cap: $889 million(at June 5 2013)Advancing a major high-grade gold resource in Canada
  34. 34. APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK COMPARATIVE GEOCHRONOLOGY34
  35. 35. APPENDIX: GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION35~192-188 MaActive island arcPorphyry-related hydrothermal systemInitial mineralizationTelescoping porphyrySyn-deposition volcanic pile deformationMain mineralization continuumMagmaticBrineVapour~196-192 MaHeatedSeawaterOceanMineralizingfluidsVolcano-sedimentarysub-basin
  36. 36. APPENDIX: GEOLOGICAL EVOLUTION36Cretaceous deformation at ~110 MaUplift and erosionValley of the KingsWaning of porphyry systemArc-related deformationMafic dyke intrusionWest ZoneSN~184 Ma
  37. 37. APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK AREA GEOLOGY37>0.3 g/t gold500mExisting 5km underground workings1980-1994 – Newhawk908 DDH/120,000m2009-2010 – Silver Standard110 DDH/50,946m2011-2012 – Pretivm426 DDH/155,144mWest ZoneValley of the Kings ZoneNorth – SouthValley of the Kings ZoneValley of the Kings Zone500mWest ZoneWest Zone(Teuton)0.65 g/t Au0 - 1047 m(Seabridge)
  38. 38. APPENDIX: VALLEY OF THE KINGS GOLD GRADE38Valley of the Kings – Indicated Resource grade consistencyResource Estimate(Snowden)Cumulative Drilling(m)Indicated Gold ResourceOunces (mil)Indicated GoldGrade (g/t)April 2012 59,100 4.9 17.3September 2012 114,949 5.1 16.2November 2012 174,182 8.5 16.4Valley of the Kings – Drilling results and gold gradeYearHole number byseriesOver 1kilogramper tonne100 - 1,000g/t15 – 100g/t5 – 15g/t Annual total2009 1 - 37 2 3 31 107 1432010 38 - 110 6 14 52 129 2012011 111 - 288 21 59 137 304 5212012 289 - 585 49 151 285 491 9762009-2012 Total: 78 227 505 1,031 1,841
  39. 39. APPENDIX: BRUCEJACK GEOLOGY CROSS SECTION39

×