Corporate Presentation     January 2013
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT  Forward Looking Information  This Presentation contains ‘‘forward-looking information’’ within the m...
An investment in Gold Major high-grade gold resource in Canada:     Valley of the Kings     8.5 M oz gold Indicated (16.1...
GOLDGold Price January 2010 to January 2013 - Weekly                                                   4
BRUCEJACK PROJECT LOCATION                             5
EXPLORATION AND OWNERSHIP HISTORY                                                             Mine                        ...
BRUCEJACK AREA GEOLOGY                           1980-1994 – Newhawk                        Valley of the Kings Zone      ...
BRUCEJACK AREA DEPOSITS                   Brucejack                   Snowfield                                       Afte...
ALTERATION AND MINERALIZATION   View North          187.5 + 2.6 Ma                                                 Mineral...
STRUCTURE : TRACE ELEMENT GOLD Lithology - West Zone & Valley of the Kings detail)                                        ...
GOLD HITS / CONSISTENT GRADE                       Over 1      500 -   100 –          Hole number kilogram     1,000    50...
STOCKWORK MINERALIZATION High-grade gold mineralization at Valley of the Kings is generally associated with  stockwork sy...
MINERALIZATION – VISIBLE GOLD                                13
VALLEY OF THE KINGS RESOURCE DOMAINS                                                          N                           ...
BRUCEJACK HIGH-GRADE RESOURCE           Gossan Hill                         Shore Zone                                    ...
VALLEY OF THE KINGS INDICATED RESOURCE                                         16
VALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCK MODEL                       Section lines to be added                                           ...
MINERALIZED STOCKWORK CORRIDORSSection 426625 (view West)                              Stockwork                          ...
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSVALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCKS – 426500E SECTION VIEW Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than ...
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSVALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCKS – 426550E SECTION VIEW Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than ...
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSVALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCKS – 426600E SECTION VIEW Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than ...
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSVALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCKS – 426650E SECTION VIEW Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than ...
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS     Plan View     1300 m.a.s.l.      100 m                                23
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS     Plan View     1275 m.a.s.l.      100 m                                24
CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS     Plan View     1250 m.a.s.l.     Viewing Window ±25 m       100 m                        ...
1345 LEVEL PLAN VIEW                       26
BULK SAMPLE: RAMP PROGRESS 5 X 5 meter slashing of  existing West Zone  workings completed Turn has initiated to  Valley...
BULK SAMPLE LOCATIONIndicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq                                                 ...
BULK SAMPLE Q2/Q3 10,000-tonne bulk  sample from Valley of  the Kings Strathcona Mineral  Services to oversee  sampling...
MINE DEVELOPMENTIsometric View Northwest, Valley of the Kings and West Zone                                               ...
LONG HOLE STOPING MINING METHOD High-grade visible gold  stringers within a lower  grade (5g/t to 20g/t) gold  quartz sto...
MINE AND MILL SITE LAYOUT                            32
PROCESS FLOWSHEET                    33
BRUCEJACK PROJECT ECONOMICS                                                 February 2012 Updated PEA (1,2)            Bas...
ADVANCING BRUCEJACK: EXPLORATION Q1 2013    Channel sample the ramp from West Zone to     Valley of the Kings    Complet...
ADVANCING BRUCEJACK: DEVELOPMENT Q2 2013    Feasibility Study Q4 2013    Environmental Assessment Application H2 2013/H1...
ADVANCING TO FEASIBILITY STUDY    Processing rate       2,700 tonnes per day    Mill facilities streamlined       Flot...
PERMITTING – BRUCEJACK LAKE    Brucejack Lake is not fish habitat    Waste rock from 1980’s/1990’s     underground devel...
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY & SUSTAINABILITY  Pretivm’s Social Responsibility Policy reflects our   commitment to establishing ...
PLANS FORWARD TO PRODUCTION                                      Key milestones                           • Completed addi...
PRETIVM MANAGEMENT      Robert Quartermain, B.Sc., M.Sc., P.Geo, D.Sc.   Kevin Torpy, B.Sc.      President & Chief Executi...
SHAREHOLDING & ANALYST COVERAGE                                                                                 Top Shareh...
SHARE PRICE VS GOLD INDEX                            43
HIGH-GRADE GOLD WITH SIZE                                    18.0                                                         ...
Advancing a major high-grade gold resource in CanadaCONTACT                     HEAD OFFICE              COMMON SHARESPhon...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

January 2013 presentation raq january 14 roth capital

1,750 views

Published on

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,750
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1,305
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

January 2013 presentation raq january 14 roth capital

  1. 1. Corporate Presentation January 2013
  2. 2. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT Forward Looking Information This Presentation contains ‘‘forward-looking information’’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information may include, but is not limited to, information with respect to the anticipated production and developments in our operations in future periods, our planned exploration and development activities, the adequacy of our financial resources, the estimation of mineral resources, realization of mineral resource estimates, costs and timing of development of the projects we currently intend to acquire (the “Projects”), costs and timing of future exploration, results of future exploration and drilling, timing and receipt of approvals, consents and permits under applicable legislation, our executive compensation approach and practice, the composition of our board of directors and committees, and adequacy of financial resources. Wherever possible, words such as ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘expects’’ or ‘‘does not expect’’, ‘‘budget’’, ‘‘scheduled’’, ‘‘estimates’’, ‘‘forecasts’’, ‘‘anticipate’’ or ‘‘does not anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘intend’’ and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results ‘‘may’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘would’’, ‘‘might’’ or ‘‘will’’ be taken, occur or be achieved, have been used to identify forward-looking information. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking information to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as ‘‘expects’’, ‘‘anticipates’’, ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘projects’’, ‘‘estimates’’, ‘‘assumes’’, ‘‘intends’’, ‘‘strategy’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘potential’’ or variations thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results ‘‘may’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘would’’, ‘‘might’’ or ‘‘will’’ be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Many of these risks are listed and described in our final short-form prospectus dated March 19, 2012 (the “Prospectus”), which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com under our profile. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Forward-looking information involves statements about the future and is inherently uncertain, and our actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in the Prospectus under the heading ‘‘Risk Factors’’. Our forward-looking information is based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, prospective investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. National Instrument 43-101 Technical and scientific information contained herein relating to the Projects is derived from National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) compliant technical reports (“Reports”) “Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project” dated February 20, 2012 “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated April 3, 2012, “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated September 18, 2012 and “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated November 20, 2012. We have filed the Reports under our profile at www.sedar.com. Technical and scientific information not contained within the Reports for the Projects have been prepared under the supervision of Mr. Kenneth C. McNaughton, an independent “qualified person” under NI 43-101. This presentation uses the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” (together “M&I”) and “inferred resources”. Although these terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under NI 43-101), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves. In addition, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre feasibility studies, or economic studies, except for a Preliminary Assessment as defined under NI 43-101. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable. Currency Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar values herein are in Canadian $. 2
  3. 3. An investment in Gold Major high-grade gold resource in Canada: Valley of the Kings 8.5 M oz gold Indicated (16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t gold) 2.9 M oz gold Inferred (5.4 Mt @ 17.0 g/t gold) Valley of the Kings remains open Underground feasibility study Q2 2013 Experienced management team 3
  4. 4. GOLDGold Price January 2010 to January 2013 - Weekly 4
  5. 5. BRUCEJACK PROJECT LOCATION 5
  6. 6. EXPLORATION AND OWNERSHIP HISTORY Mine Approval in DevelopmentExploration by Reclamation principle for Certificate issued Reclamation Project Assessment various Permit development of a April 15, 1993 Completion Certificate allowed to Acquisition by companies MX-1-86 mine at West Zone (MDC 92-06) (MEND 9.1c) expire (PAC M98-03) Pretivm 1960- Dec. 1980 1986 1989 1993 1999 2006 2010 1980- 1986- 1990 1998 1999- 2009 2011- 1985 1989 2000 2012 West Zone 5.3 km West Zone Development Acquisition by Discovery of Permitted for high-grade discovery underground Feasibility Study plans suspended Silver Standard Valley of the exploration program and by Newhawk development of completed Resources Inc. Kings Zone exploration road West Zone (MX-1-832), (MX-1-842) 6
  7. 7. BRUCEJACK AREA GEOLOGY 1980-1994 – Newhawk Valley of the Kings Zone 908 DDH/120,000m West Zone 2009-2010 – Silver Standard Valley of the Kings Zone 110 DDH/50,946m West Zone 2011-2012 – Pretivm Valley of the Kings Zone 426 DDH/155,144m West Zone North – South 500m >0.3 g/t gold 0.65 g/t Au Existing 5km underground workings 0 - 1,047 m 500m West Zone Valley of the Kings 7
  8. 8. BRUCEJACK AREA DEPOSITS Brucejack Snowfield After Sillitoe (2010) TSX, NYSE:PVG 8
  9. 9. ALTERATION AND MINERALIZATION View North 187.5 + 2.6 Ma Mineralizing gold fluids 195.1 + 2.8Ma 194.1 + 0.9 Ma 9
  10. 10. STRUCTURE : TRACE ELEMENT GOLD Lithology - West Zone & Valley of the Kings detail) 10
  11. 11. GOLD HITS / CONSISTENT GRADE Over 1 500 - 100 – Hole number kilogram 1,000 500 30 – 100 15 – 30 5 – 15 Year by series per tonne g/t g/t g/t g/t g/t Annual total 2009 1 - 37 2 3 14 17 107 143 2010 38 - 110 6 2 12 26 26 129 201 2011 111 - 288 21 11 48 63 74 304 521 2009-2011 Subtotal: 29 13 63 103 117 540 865 2012 289 - 585 49 26 125 151 134 491 976 2009-2012 Total: 78 39 188 254 251 1,031 1,841 Valley of the Kings – Indicated Grade Resource Estimate Cumulative Indicated Gold Indicated Gold Grade (Snowden) Drilling Resource Ounces (g/t) (m) (millions) April 2012 59,100 4.9 17.3 September 2012 114,949 5.1 16.2 November 2012 174,182 8.5 16.4 11
  12. 12. STOCKWORK MINERALIZATION High-grade gold mineralization at Valley of the Kings is generally associated with stockwork systems 12
  13. 13. MINERALIZATION – VISIBLE GOLD 13
  14. 14. VALLEY OF THE KINGS RESOURCE DOMAINS N Brucejack Fault 250 m N 250 m 14
  15. 15. BRUCEJACK HIGH-GRADE RESOURCE Gossan Hill Shore Zone N Valley of the Kings Mineral Resource Estimate – West Zone November 2012(1,4,5) (Based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne) Contained(3) Category Tonnes Gold Silver Gold Silver (mil) (g/t) (g/t) (mil oz) (mil oz) Indicated 16.1 16.4 14.2 8.5 7.3 Inferred(2) 5.4 17.0 15.7 2.9 2.7 Valley of the Kings (1) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, marketing, or other relevant issues. The Mineral Resources in this news release were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Bridge Zone Council. (2) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as an Key Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category. 0.5-5.0 g/t AuEq (3) Contained metal may differ due to rounding. (4) The Mineral Resource estimate is defined using 5 m by 5 by 5 m blocks in the well drilled 500 m 5.0-15.0 g/t AuEq portion of West Zone (5 m by 10 m drilling or better) and 10 m by 10 m by 10 m blocks in the remainder of West Zone and in Valley of the Kings. >15.0 g/t AuEq (5) The gold equivalent value is defined as AuEq=Au + Ag/53 15
  16. 16. VALLEY OF THE KINGS INDICATED RESOURCE 16
  17. 17. VALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCK MODEL Section lines to be added 17
  18. 18. MINERALIZED STOCKWORK CORRIDORSSection 426625 (view West) Stockwork (illustrative) Proposed bulk sample cross-cut 18
  19. 19. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSVALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCKS – 426500E SECTION VIEW Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq 19 View facing West - 50 m thick viewing corridor
  20. 20. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSVALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCKS – 426550E SECTION VIEW Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq 20 View facing West - 50 m thick viewing corridor
  21. 21. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSVALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCKS – 426600E SECTION VIEW Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq 21 View facing West - 50 m thick viewing corridor
  22. 22. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKSVALLEY OF THE KINGS BLOCKS – 426650E SECTION VIEW Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq 22 View facing West - 50 m thick viewing corridor
  23. 23. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS Plan View 1300 m.a.s.l. 100 m 23
  24. 24. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS Plan View 1275 m.a.s.l. 100 m 24
  25. 25. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS Plan View 1250 m.a.s.l. Viewing Window ±25 m 100 m 25
  26. 26. 1345 LEVEL PLAN VIEW 26
  27. 27. BULK SAMPLE: RAMP PROGRESS 5 X 5 meter slashing of existing West Zone workings completed Turn has initiated to Valley of the Kings, with initial 57 meters Junction of 1314 re-muck (l) and Valley of the Kings ramp(r) completed at year-end Total ramp planned is 541 meters in length Ramp progress at December 31 2012 27
  28. 28. BULK SAMPLE LOCATIONIndicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq 28
  29. 29. BULK SAMPLE Q2/Q3 10,000-tonne bulk sample from Valley of the Kings Strathcona Mineral Services to oversee sampling Sample tower located on site Remainder of sample to be processed to produce gold Source: Strathcona Mineral Services Limited, Meladine Project 29
  30. 30. MINE DEVELOPMENTIsometric View Northwest, Valley of the Kings and West Zone Twin Access Portals Underground crusher West Zone Mineral Resource Estimate – Apr. 2012(1,4,5) (Based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne) Contained(3) Valley of the Kings Mineral Resource Estimate – Nov. 2012 (1,4) Category Tonnes Gold Silver Gold Silver Contained(3) (mil) (g/t) (g/t) (mil oz) (mil oz) Category Tonnes Gold Silver Gold Silver Measured 2.4 5.85 347 0.5 26.8 (mil) (g/t) (g/t) (mil oz) (mil oz) Indicated 2.5 5.86 190 0.5 15.1 Indicated 16.1 16.4 14.2 8.5 7.3 M+I 4.9 5.85 267 0.9 41.9 Inferred(2) 5.4 17.0 15.7 2.9 2.7 Inferred(2) 4.0 6.44 82 0.8 10.6 30 (1,2,3,4,5) See table notes slide number 16.
  31. 31. LONG HOLE STOPING MINING METHOD High-grade visible gold stringers within a lower grade (5g/t to 20g/t) gold quartz stockwork Steeply dipping ore body Competent ground conditions Stope widths (15m wide X 30m high) appropriate both for transverse and longitudinal layouts Cost effective 31 First 50 meters of Valley of the Kings ramp
  32. 32. MINE AND MILL SITE LAYOUT 32
  33. 33. PROCESS FLOWSHEET 33
  34. 34. BRUCEJACK PROJECT ECONOMICS February 2012 Updated PEA (1,2) Based on 5.0 g/t cut-off gold sensitivity of 5.33 million ounces M&I (8.6Mt @ 19.35 g/t gold) and 3.29 million ounces Inferred (4.0Mt @ 25.73 g/t gold): Project Economics (base case, pre-tax US$0.93:C$1) Processing & Production Summary Gold Price US$1,100 Processing rate 1,500 tpd Silver Price US$21 Mine life 24 years Net Cash Flow US$5.133 billion Total gold 6.9 million oz production Net Present Value US$2.262 billion Average annual gold 325,000 ounces (5% discount) production (Yrs 1-12) Capex US$436.3 million Mining costs C$103.60/t milled Internal Rate of 29.8% Total operating costs C$170.90/t milled Return Gold recovery 95.7% (gravity and Payback 4.1 years flotation) (1) Source: Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project, effective date February 20, 2012 (2) PEA is based on Mineral Resource estimates for the Valley of the Kings and West Zone effective November 28, 2011 which are now out-of-date.Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The PEA is preliminary in natureand includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerationsapplied that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty the PEA will be realized. 34
  35. 35. ADVANCING BRUCEJACK: EXPLORATION Q1 2013  Channel sample the ramp from West Zone to Valley of the Kings  Complete ramp from West Zone to Valley of the Kings Q2 2013  Underground sampling/drilling Valley of the Kings  10,000-tonne underground bulk sample from Valley of the Kings  Sample Tower Mid 2013 (post bulk sample)  Process bulk sample  Valley of the Kings expansion drilling 35
  36. 36. ADVANCING BRUCEJACK: DEVELOPMENT Q2 2013  Feasibility Study Q4 2013  Environmental Assessment Application H2 2013/H1 2014  Basic and detailed engineering 2015  Construction Ongoing  First Nations and community consultation 36
  37. 37. ADVANCING TO FEASIBILITY STUDY  Processing rate  2,700 tonnes per day  Mill facilities streamlined  Flotation concentrate to be sold to 3rd parties rather than refined on site  Capex and Opex savings, reduced project footprint  Metallurgy continues to be positive  Feasibility metallurgical studies confirm gold recoveries over 95% 37
  38. 38. PERMITTING – BRUCEJACK LAKE  Brucejack Lake is not fish habitat  Waste rock from 1980’s/1990’s underground development was deposited in Brucejack Lake as part of 1999 reclamation  Brucejack Lake has an estimated volume of over 30M m3 and is approximately 100 meters deep  Less than 50% of tailings (targeting 40%) to be deposited in Brucejack Lake, with total volume of tailings and waste rock stored in bottom 30 meters  More than 50% of tailings (targeting 60%) to be used for paste backfill and deposited underground 38
  39. 39. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY & SUSTAINABILITY  Pretivm’s Social Responsibility Policy reflects our commitment to establishing positive, trusting relationships with First Nations, local communities and other key stakeholders  We are working to ensure that communication with local communities is open and continuous, and that the benefits of our exploration success can extend to them  We will collaborate with community leaders to explore training and employment opportunities  Pretivm’s management team has been cooperatively engaging with First Nations and local community leaders in the Stewart, BC region for over 10 years  We have begun the consultation process with community leaders concerning the Brucejack high- grade opportunity 39
  40. 40. PLANS FORWARD TO PRODUCTION Key milestones • Completed additional drilling in Valley of the Kings • Initiated feasibility study • Initiated exploration decline from West Zone historic workings to • Anticipate EAC Valley of the Kings issue • Filed Project Description • Underground• Property acquired by • Completed exploration access road development Pretivm to Highway 37 • Begin construction • Production target H2 2010 2012 2014 2016 2011 2013 2015 • First resource estimate • Complete Feasibility Study • Construction • Aggressive drill • Complete exploration decline for • Begin commissioning program in Valley of the underground test sample from • Ramp-up Kings Valley of the Kings • Extract test sample from Valley of the Kings (10,000 tonnes) • Basic and detailed engineering • Submit Environmental Assessment Certificate (EAC) application 40
  41. 41. PRETIVM MANAGEMENT Robert Quartermain, B.Sc., M.Sc., P.Geo, D.Sc. Kevin Torpy, B.Sc. President & Chief Executive Officer, Director, Mine Engineering Director Joseph Ovsenek, B.A. Sc., P.Eng., LLB Max Holtby, B.Sc., P. Geo. Vice President & Chief Development Officer, Director, Permitting Director Ken McNaughton, M.A. Sc., P.Eng. Michelle Romero, B.A., M.L.S. Vice President & Chief Exploration Officer Director, Corporate Relations Ian I Chang, M.A. Sc., P.Eng. Andrew Saltis, I.Eng. Vice President, Project Development Site Project Manager, Mine Manager Warwick Board, Ph.D., P.Geo. Peter de Visser, CA Chief Geologist Chief Financial Officer 41
  42. 42. SHAREHOLDING & ANALYST COVERAGE Top Shareholders(2) (shares in millions) Silver Silver Standard Resources 18.986 Standard, 20% Royce & Associates 10.841 Institutions, Passport Capital 3.966 Management, 50% Fidelity Management 3.739 5% Connor, Clark & Lunn 2.996 Retail, 23% Robert Quartermain 2.868 Norges Bank Investment 2.410 Carmignac Gestion 2.400 Sprott Asset Management 1.581Capital Structure(1) (shares in millions) Analyst CoveragePublic Float 75.8 CIBC Jeff KilleenSilver Standard Shares 19.0 Citibank Alex HackingTotal Issued & Outstanding Shares 94.8 Cormark Securities Richard GrayIncentive Options 8.5 Dahlman Rose Adam GrafTotal Fully Diluted Shares 103.3 GMP Securities Craig West RBC Dan RollinsMarket Capitalization C$1.3 billion Salman Partners Ash Guglani Scotiabank Ovais HabibWorking Capital (at Sept. 30, 2012) C$59.8 million UBS Chris Lichtenheldt Very Independent Research John Tumazos(1)As of January 3, 2013; ownership calculated on an undiluted basis. 42(2)As of January 3, 2013. Source: IPREO, SEDI
  43. 43. SHARE PRICE VS GOLD INDEX 43
  44. 44. HIGH-GRADE GOLD WITH SIZE 18.0 Valley of the Kings 16.0 Kirkland Lake Mine F2 Deposit (Rubicon) Indicated Gold: (Kirkland Lake) 8.5 mm oz @ 16.4 g/t Au M&I + Inferred Gold Grade (g/t) 14.0 Inferred Gold: Pogo Mine 2.9 mm oz @ 17.0 g/t Au 12.0 (Sumitomo) Red Lake Mine (Goldcorp) 10.0 Buritica (Continental) Eleonore Kensington Mine (Goldcorp) 8.0 (Coeur) Cerro Negro El Penon Mine (Goldcorp) Cerro Moro (Yamana) 6.0 (Yamana) Casa Berardi 4.0 (Aurizon) 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 M&I + Inferred Gold Resources (mm oz)November 2012 Valley of the Kings High-Grade Gold Mineral Resource based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne.Data sources: Intierra Ltd., NRH. 44
  45. 45. Advancing a major high-grade gold resource in CanadaCONTACT HEAD OFFICE COMMON SHARESPhone: 604-558-1784 Pretium Resources Inc. TSX/NYSE:PVGFax: 604-558-4784 570 Granville St. Issued: 94.8 millionToll-free: 1-877-558-1784 Suite 1600 Fully diluted: 102.0 millioninvest@pretivm.com Vancouver, BC 52-week hi/low: $18.15/$8.27www.pretivm.com Canada V6C 3P1 Market cap: $1.3 billion

×