Advertisement

Analytical parameters in Avaleha kalpana

Doctor at RKM ayurvedic medical college, Vijayapura
Mar. 28, 2023
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

Analytical parameters in Avaleha kalpana

  1. Seminar on ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS IN AVALEHA KALPANA By Dr. Priyanka Patil MD(Ayu) Dept of RS & BK
  2. क्वाथादीनाां पुनः पाकात् घनत्वां सा रसक्रिया सोÅवलेह्श्च लेह्शः स्यात् तन्मात्रा स्यात्पलोलोमन्मता -शा म ख ८/१
  3. The kashaya, svarasa or any other liquid preparation is prepared The sweetening agents like Guda, Sharkara or Khanda sharkara are dissolved in liquid preparations over mild fire The blend may be filtered to get rid of physical impurities The filtrate is reboiled and reduced to consistency of 1 to 2 threads.
  4.  Ghee is added just before paka lakshana stage Dose : 1 pala Shelf life : upto 1 year As avaleha paka lakshana are attained, prakshepa dravya are added & stirred well Honey should be added after the preparation becomes completely cool and it is packed,stored in Air tight container
  5.  Any product requires certain analytical standards or parameters. These are more essential, particularly in case of drugs and formulations.  The formulations may be single drug preparation or a compound preparation the analytical parameters are must. However, parameters required for different preparation may be different. Analytical standards are the dimensions to evaluate a product.  It is compulsory to describe a product by analytical standards since these standards speak of quality, authenticity and purity of the product.  In India there are about 9000 ayurvedic pharmacies are working and preparing ayurvedic medicines, among these most of them prepare low quality and do not give expected results.  so to provide standard value ,to provide quality control, safety and efficacy of Ayurvedic formulations STANDARDIZATION IS essential tool.  Certain parameters are necessary for raw drugs, procedures and end products to provide quality assurance.
  6.  Standardization is classified in 3 steps • Standardization of raw drugs Step 1 • Standardization of process/SOP Step 2 • Standardization of finished products (ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS) Step 3
  7.  1. Description  Colour  Odour  Taste  2. Loss on drying at 105 C  3. Total – ash  4. Acid – insoluble ash  5. pH  6. Total solid  7. Fat content  8. Reducing sugar  9. Total sugar  10. Identifications, TLC/HPTLC  11. Test for heavy metals  Lead  Cadmium  Mercury  Arsenic
  8.  12. Microbial contamination  Total bacterial count  Total fungal count  13. Test for specific Pathogen  E. coli  Salmonella spp.  S.aureus  Pseudomonas aeruginosa  14. Pesticide residue  Organochlorine pesticides  Organophosphorus pesticides  Pyrethroids  15 Test for Aflatoxins (B1,B2,G1,G2)
  9.  Description : Semisolid sticky paste  Colour: Usually Blackish Brown  Odour : Pleasant  Taste : Bitter, Astringent, Spicy
  10.  To the crucible containing total ash, add 25 ml of dilute hydrochloric acid. Collect the insoluble matter on an ashless filter paper (Whatman 41) and wash with hot water until the filtrate is neutral. Transfer the filter paper containing the insoluble matter to the original crucible, dry on a hot-plate and ignite to constant weight. Allow the residue to cool in a suitable desiccator for 30 minutes and weigh without delay. Calculate the content of acid-insoluble ash with reference to the air-dried drug.
  11.  Boil the ash for 5 minutes with 25 ml of water; collect insoluble matter in a Gooch crucible or on an ashless filter paper, wash with hot water, and ignite for 15 minutes at a temperature not exceeding 450. Subtract the weight of the insoluble matter from the weight of the ash; the difference in weight represents the water-soluble ash. Calculate the percentage of water-soluble ash with reference to the air-dried drug.
  12.  Incinerate about 2 to 3 g accurately weighed, of the ground drug in a tared platinum or silica dish at a temperature not exceeding 450c until free from carbon, cool and weigh. If a carbon free ash cannot be obtained in this way, exhaust the charred mass with hot water, collect the residue on an ash less filter paper, incinerate the residue and filter , add the filtrate, evaporate to dryness, and ignite at a temperature not exceeding 450. Calculate the percentage of ash with reference to the air-dried drug.
  13.  Procedure set forth here determines the amount of volatile matter (i.e., water drying off from the drug). For substances appearing to contain water as the only volatile constituent, the procedure given below, is appropriately used.  Place about 10 g of drug (without preliminary drying) after accurately weighing (accurately weighed to within 0.01 g) it in a tared evaporating dish. For example, for un ground or un powdered drug, prepare about 10 g of the sample by cutting shredding so that the parts are about 3 mm in thickness. Seeds and fruits, smaller than 3 mm should be cracked. Avoid the use of high speed mills in preparing the samples, and exercise care that no appreciable amount of moisture is lost during preparation and that the portion taken is representative of the official sample. After placing the above said amount of the drug in the tared evaporating dish, dry at 105 for 5 hours, and weigh. Continue the drying and weighing at one hour interval until difference between two successive weighing corresponds to not more than 0.25 per cent. Constant weight is reached when two consecutive weighing after drying for 30 minutes and cooling for 30 minutes in a desiccator, show not more than 0.01 g difference
  14. pH  Defined as the common logarithm of the reciprocal of the hydrogen ion concentration expressed in g per liter.  It can be determined potentiometrically by means of the glass electrode, a reference electrode and a pH meter either of the digital or analogue type.
  15. Extract accurately weighed air dried sample with petroleum ether (40-600C) in Soxhlet apparatus. Dry the extract over anhydrous sodium sulphate and remove the solvent under vacuum at 400C. Weigh the residue and calculate the percentage with reference to the weight of sample material used.
  16.  20 ml. sample was taken in a glass beaker to which the clarifying agent, 10% lead acetate solution, was added and warmed for about 3-5 minutes to get the precipitate. Solution was filtered through brown paper. To the filtrate sodium oxalate was added to dissolve excessive lead acetate and to get a clear solution. This solution was filtered through the filter bed made up of glass wool, cotton and Whattman no. 1 filter paper to get a clear solution, washing was given by distilled water and the volume was made up to 250 ml
  17.  20 ml. of solution, 20 ml. each of Fehling’s A and Fehling’s B solutions were added, boiled for three minutes and filtered through filter bed (glass wool, cotton and Whattman no. 1 filter paper). Repeated washing was given by hot distilled water till clear, colourless filtrate was obtained. Precipitate of cuprous oxide (residue) was then taken with acid ferric solution to dissolve the precipitate completely in it. This solution was titrated against KMnO4 using ortho phenanthrolin as indicator. At the end point the brownish solution changes to green. From the amount of KMnO4 solution required the amount of copper was calculated. Then percentage of sugar content was determined from Hammond table.
  18.  25 ml of the clarified solution was taken; to it 5 ml of 6N HCl was added and heated on water bath at 67-71°C. Then treated with concentrated NaOH by using phenolphthalein as indicator till pink colour appeared. Volume was made upto 100 ml. For the determination of total sugar 20 ml. of this solution was taken and the remaining procedure is the same as that of reducing sugar. Percentage of total sugar was calculated from Hammond table.
  19.  Determination of non-reducing sugar : The non-reducing sugar content was obtained by subtracting reducing sugar from total sugar. (Non reducing sugar = Total sugar – reducing sugar.)
  20. A technique in which solute undergo distribution between two phases i) Stationary phase-acting through adsorption ii) Mobile phase in the form of liquid. Identification can be effected by observation of spots of identical Rf value and about equal magnitude obtained, respectively, with an unknown and a reference sample chromatographic on the same plate. A visual comparison of the size and intensity of the spots usually serves for semi-quantitative estimation.
  21.  Preparation of plates  Application of solution  Developing the plates  Drying the plates  Visualization at 264nm or 365nm
  22.  The following tests are designed for the estimation of the number of visible aerobic micro-organisms present and for detecting the presence of designated microbial species in pharmaceutical substances. The term 'growth' is used to designate the presence and presumed proliferation of viable micro-organisms.
  23. Parameter Specifications Total bacterial count 1 X 105 CFU/g Yeast & mould 1 X 103 CFU/g E.Coli Absent Salmonella Absent P. Aeruginosa Absent S. Aureus Absent 2. Pesticide residue – organo-chloro group Less than 1 ppm 3.Heavy metals Lead 10 ppm Mercury 01 ppm Arsenic 03 ppm Cadmium 0.3 ppm 4.Aflatoxin B1 – 0.5 ppm G1 – 0.5 ppm B2 – 0.1 ppm G2 – 0.1 ppm
  24.  Pharmacognostical & physicochemical Analysis of Musta-Triphaladi Avalehya, used in the management of Thalassemia Major-IJAM  Kalawana , Harisha CR , Rajagopala S Patel KS , Kori VK  PG Scholar, Assistant Professor, Professor and Head of the Department of Kaumarbhritya ,Pharmacognosy Laboratory  I.P.G.T.&R.A., Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.361008
  25. Parameters Musta triphaladi avaleha Loss on drying at 110◦C 11.094 % w/w pH Value 6.0 Water soluble extractive 76.29 % w/w Alcohol soluble extractive 83.65 % w/w Ash Value 0.142 g Acid insoluble Ash 0.193%
  26. STANDARDIZATION OF POLY HERBAL AYURVEDIC FORMULATION –VYAGHRI HARITAKI AVALEHA WITH CLASSICAL VIEW POINT – IJRP by RAM PRAKASH,BHAGEL M.S,SHUKLA V.J IGPT & RA ,JAMNAGAR,GUJARAT
  27. Parameter API Parameters Gujarat ayurveda university Loss on drying at 105 NMT 23% w/w 18.40 % Ash value NMT 4% W/W 2.86% Water soluble extract NLT 68.7 % W/W 55.00% Methanol soluble extract NLT 20% W/W 48.91% Acid insoluble extract NMT 0.15% W/W 0.29% pH 5.5- 6 5.0 Sulphated ash NMT 0.41% W/W 5.01%
  28.  No doubt that analytical parameters are last step in standardization of pharmaceutical preparations, but standardization of raw material by pharma cognostical methods and following the standard methods of preparation are the prior steps which play an important role in the quality of the end product.  Increased demand for Raw materials, decreased production of raw materials due to deforestation and urbanization of the land ,the out come of prepared medicine is of low quality, to over come from this problem ,analytical parameters are essential.  The therapeutic effect depends on the quality of the drug administered. To obtain the expected outcome after administration on particular disease, especially a combined drug formula all ingredients should be present in it, this can be confirmed with the help of these analytical parameters.  Many classical preparations are yet to be standardized which are used in day to day practice.
Advertisement