Advertisement

Making anticipated results possible (marp) expanding the hiv responses - christoph hamelmann

PinHealth
Jul. 2, 2015
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

More from PinHealth(20)

Making anticipated results possible (marp) expanding the hiv responses - christoph hamelmann

  1. Making Anticipated Results Possible (MARP): Expanding the HIV Responses Dr Christoph Hamelmann Regional Team Leader (Europe and Central Asia) and Senior Advisor (Arab States) HIV, Health and Development Global Coordinator, Secretariat of the UN informal Interagency Task Team on Sustainable Procurement in the Health Sector (SPHS) UNDP Istanbul Regional Hub 7th Regional HIV and AIDS Conference Sarajevo, 28-29 May 2015 Plenary Session 1: Exit Strategy
  2. Expanding the HIV Response: Our Coordinates • Getting to Zero: Infections, death, discrimination • Target 3.3: By 2030, end AIDS epidemic • Target 3.8: Universal health coverage Fast Track! Towards Sustainable Development Goals
  3. Making Anticipated Results Possible (MARP): Expanding the HIV Responses Dr Christoph Hamelmann Regional Team Leader (Europe and Central Asia) and Senior Advisor (Arab States) HIV, Health and Development Global Coordinator, Secretariat of the UN informal Interagency Task Team on Sustainable Procurement in the Health Sector (SPHS) UNDP Istanbul Regional Hub 7th Regional HIV and AIDS Conference Sarajevo, 28-29 May 2015 Transition Strategy
  4. HIV Epidemic in EECA • The HIV epidemic is still growing1 • The number of PLHIV increased from 860,000 to 1,1 million between 2001 and 20131 • AIDS related deaths increased by 5% between 2005 and 20131 • 57 percent of all new HIV infections are attributable to the sharing of syringes and needles2 • Treatment coverage was 21% in 20131 1 UNAIDS GAP report, 2014. 2 GFATM. Turning the Tide Against HIV and Tuberculosis - Global Fund Investment Guidance for Eastern Europe and Central Asia, 2014
  5. HIV Epidemic in EECA • HIV testing and counseling among key populations remains insufficient, which leads to delayed diagnosis of HIV infections and late treatment initiation. • Access to harm reduction services - including opioid substitution therapy as well as needle and syringe exchange programs - remained limited. • Rights violations, stigma and discrimination towards people living with and affected by HIV are still key characteristics of the epidemic in the EECA region
  6. *Kosovo UN1244 * Source: Global Fund
  7. HIV Infections and GF Status in SEE Country PLHIV est. Newly diagnosed (2013) PLHIV on ART (2013) Main key population among newly HIV diagnosed GF status (source: GF) Albania1 <1000 117 335 85% HS Financial closure Bosnia & Herzegovina2 n/a 21 (2014) 114 50% MSM Active Bulgaria1 n/a 200 626 (2012) MSM/PWID/HS Active Croatia3 n/a 92 (2014) 7938 85% MSM Closed FYR Macedonia4 <200 37 (2014) 90 68% MSM Active Montenegro5 n/a 10 65 60% MSM Active Romania1,6 16 000 507 8 809 55% HS Closed Serbia7 3 000 147 1165 64% MSM Closed Slovenia6 n/a 44 n/a 61% MSM No Sources: 1UNAIDS, 2 UNDP BiH, 3 IPH Croatia, 4 IPH FYR Macedonia, 5 IPH Montenegro , 6 ECDC, 7 IPH Serbia, 8 University hospital for infectious disease
  8. Global Fund HIV Investment in SEE Country or territory Income category Disease burden Total grant US$ End date Eligibility Albania UMI Low 5 459 367 31.03.2015 Transition Bosnia & Herzegovina UMI Low 40 923 294 30.11.2015 No Bulgaria UMI High 50 451 295 31.12.2015 NGO rule Croatia High income Low 4 944 324 30.11.2006 No Kosovo UN 1244 Upper LMI Low 6 837 726 30.06.2015 Eligible FYR Macedonia UMI Low 20 061 369 31.12.2016 No Montenegro UMI Low 8 803 621 30.06.2015 No Romania UMI High 37 671 819 30.06.2010 NGO rule Serbia UMI High 30 628 736 30.09.2014 Eligible Slovenia High income Low - - No Source: GFATM website
  9. UNDP’s Regional Project on Sustainable Financing of National HIV Responses • Started in 2012 • Involves currently 14 countries in EECA, with particular focus on countries with UNDP PR-ship of Global Fund grants • Supports governments, civil society organizations, affected key populations and PLHIV • Collaborates closely with UNAIDS and other co-sponsors • Involves a team of regional and country office UNDP staff and national and international consultants
  10. Concepts and Components: Getting Started • Rights-based approach • Understanding the national context  disease burden  health system structures including health financing  legal and regulatory frameworks • Know your epidemic • Know your response: National and international goals, objectives and targets, current achievements and gaps
  11. Concepts and Components: What Needs to Be Transitioned? • Which programme components are externally funded? • To what amount (absolute and percentage, by component and total)? • Who is providing these services (public, private for- profit, private non-profit)?
  12. Concepts and Components: What Needs to Be Transitioned? Prevention (P) ($) P A ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) P B ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) P C ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) Treatment (T) ($) T A ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) T B ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) T C ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) Others (O) ($) O A ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) B B ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) O C ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) 0 5 10 15 20 Prevention Treatment Others Total External Domestic $ External funds details
  13. Concepts and Components: Can we achieve more for a $? • Technical efficiency • Allocative efficiency
  14. Concepts and Components: Technical Efficiency Factor costs Human resources Commodities Others Service delivery models Central / de-central Public / private Others Others Infrastructure Critical enablers Others Unit costs Service output Defined quality standard
  15. Concepts and Components: Allocative Efficiency Current budget, current allocation Current budget, optimized allocation
  16. Concepts and Components: Allocative Efficiency http://www.eurasia.undp.org/content/dam/rbec/docs/UNDP%20 Modelling%20Tajikistan_English.pdf
  17. In Focus: NGO Social Contracting Programme components Budget allocated to NGOs ($) % of line budget National/sub-national /local level (%) Prevention PWID 679,868 47.7 0/0/100 MSM 224,881 86.4 0/0/100 SW 219,846 90.3 0/0/100 Prison inmates 106,226 77.4 0/0/100 Youth 468,546 87.5 0/0/100 Roma and migrants 426,328 93.0 0/100/0 Prevention subtotal 2,125,695 69.5 0/20/80 Psychosocial support subtotal 654,390 61.3 100/0/0 Enabling environment subtotal 325,409 93.0 28/4/68 TOTAL 3,105,494 35.1 24/14/62
  18. In Focus: NGO Social Contracting Country Fact Sheets • Current NGO service provision and NGO landscape • Legal and regulatory frameworks for NGO social contracting • Prerequisites for service provision • Quality control and assurance • Best practices examples
  19. In Focus: Access to Affordable Medicines http://www.eurasia.undp.org/content/rbec/en/home/ourwork/hiv_aids/in_depth/sustainable-financing-of-hiv-responses/
  20. Concepts and Components: Transition – Where to? Prevention (P) ($) P A ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) P B ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) P C ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) Treatment (T) ($) T A ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) T B ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) T C ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) Others (O) ($) O A ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) B B ($) Pu b ($) F-P/NGO ($) Sub-national budgets Annual total ($) To absorb ($) (% of total) National budgets Annual total ($) To absorb ($) (% of total) Local budgets Annual total ($) To absorb ($) (% of total) Resources: A B D E A D E FC External funds details Domestic funds details
  21. Example Croatia Additional Domestic Funding Sourcing Example A: Part of lottery fund went to PWID programmes 2014: $ 220,000 Joint call for application from Ministry of Social Care and Youth, MoH, and Commissariat for Drug Control Example B: MoH budget 2014 call for health programmes (including harm reduction): $18,000 2014 call for psychosicial support: $462,000 (for PLHIV: $ 161,000) Example C: Part of Lottery fund for a three-years health programmes of NGOs in implementation of national strategies 2014: $ 915,000 ($ 728,000 for HIV-related programmes) 14 NGOs: harm reduction (including NSP), psychosocial support, MSM and others
  22. Scaling-up to universal access
  23. Universal access: rights-based approach, SDG 3 target and highest impact DALYs averted
  24. Involvement of NGO Networks • Sub-national networks (example: Vojvodinian HIV network of NGOs and public institutions – coordination, joint applications, advocacy on local and sub-national level, Serbia) • National networks (example: USOP – Union of PLHIV organisations in Serbia, advocacy, enabling environment at the national level, Serbia) • Regional (example: NeLP – 18 low prevalence countries in Central and South Eastern Europe, coordinations and advocacy for access to targeted prevention, testing, treatment)
  25. Know Your Rights, Use Your Laws A Handbook for: • People who live with HIV • Their families and friends • People at higher risk of HIV • Their families and friends • Activists, supporters • Service planers and providers http://www.undp.org/content/dam/rbec/docs/UNDP%20HIV%20and%20Rights%20UK_web.pdf
  26. United Nations Development Programme christoph.hamelmann@undp.org Twitter: @cahamelmann Timur Abdullaev, Predrag Duric, Boyan Konstantinov, John Macauley
Advertisement