SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Successfully reported this slideshow.
Activate your 14 day free trial to unlock unlimited reading.
Presentation for the Tufts School of Medicine class: Digital Strategies for Health, July 2012. There is also a version of these slides on Wikipedia: http://enwp.org/WP:TUFTSMED
open educational resources advocate, online peer production expert
Presentation for the Tufts School of Medicine class: Digital Strategies for Health, July 2012. There is also a version of these slides on Wikipedia: http://enwp.org/WP:TUFTSMED
1.
Wikipedia and Health Information
Readership • Quality • Production process
Pete Forsyth
User:Peteforsyth
@PeteForsyth
wikistrategies.net
@WikiStrategies
Prepared for:
Summer Institute on Digital Strategies for Health Communication
Tufts University School of Medicine
July 18, 2012
Follow online: http://enwp.org/WP:TUFTSMED
2.
Wikipedia readership
Guess: how many times is each of
the following articles viewed in a month?
Article Monthly
views
1 Bicycle safety
2 Bicycle helmet
3 BH laws by country
4 BHs in New Zealand
5 BHs in Australia
6 BHs in the US
7 BH laws
8 BH Safety Institute
3.
Wikipedia readership
Readership during April 2012, as reported at stats.grok.se
Article Monthly
Views
1 Bicycle safety 2120
2 Bicycle helmet 7324
3 BH laws by country 869
4 BHs in New Zealand 518
5 BHs in Australia 626
6 BHs in the US 219
7 BH laws 1334
8 BH Safety Institute 114
4.
Factors that impact readership
● Search results
● Incoming links
● Internal links
● Article quality (drives each of above)
● News events
5.
Are these numbers low? High?
Free license–many views are not counted:
● mobile apps
● offline uses
● Facebook/Google republishing
6.
Are these numbers low? High?
Source: wikistrategies.net/wikipedia-traffic-news
7.
Pew Research on durability
Source: ethicalwiki.com; used by permission
8.
Pew Research on durability
Source: ethicalwiki.com; used by permission
9.
Quality of content
Study: Wikipedia as accurate as Britannica.
–Nature, 2005
● Claim has been disputed, but even being
close is signif cant.
i
● English Wikipedia has 8x as many articles in
2012 as in 2005.
● Proportion of Featured Articles (top quality,
peer reviewed content) remains about 1/1000.
● Peer review process has become more
rigorous, and found to be robust.
● International and multilingual focus has
grown.
Source: news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html
10.
Quality of content
Study: Curious people use Wikipedia as
scaffolding.
–Ed Chi, 2011
● Subjects were asked to research a topic.
● Most spent a lot of time on Wikipedia in the
i
f rst few minutes, later gravitating toward more
thorough or more authoritative sites.
Source: j.mp/EdChiWS2011 (slide 21) • wikistrategies.net/tying-it-all-together/
11.
Quality of content
Source: j.mp/EdChiWS2011 (slide 21) • wikistrategies.net/tying-it-all-together/
12.
Peer production
Wikipedia construction guided by strong values.
The Five Pillars:
● Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.
● Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.
●Wikipedia is free content that anyone can edit,
use, modify, and distribute.
● Editors should interact with each other in a
respectful and civil manner.
● Wikipedia does not have f rm rules.
i
13.
Talk pages: a key innovation
Readers and editors are invited and encouraged to
discuss editorial changes, on a separate, but linked
"talk page."
Example: Talk:Bicycle safety, 2005
14.
Talk pages: a key innovation
Example from Talk:Bicycle safety, 2005:
I acknowledge that this [article] might contain
elements of [bias], I have strong opinions. I aim to
reference more of it in the near future. —JzG
Here's a suggestion… present one side as
[unbiased] as you can. … I like the idea of
presenting as many sides as feasible, and letting
the reader decide. Informative over persuasive.
--Christopherlin
Yes, you are right I know. … —JzG
15.
Edit history: Perceiving activity
Software supports following actions of your
fellow editors very closely.
Example: "Bicycle helmet" history page
16.
Production: WikiProjects etc.
Analogous to a “talk page” for a topic area
●WikiProject Medicine is a very active project
●WikiProject Health & f tness is not
i
● Many refinements to Featured Article system
17.
Production: Further discussion
● Conf icts of interest (WP:COI)
l
● See: Evolution of an article
(case study)
enwp.org/outreach:Evolution_of_an_article_(Celilo_Falls)
18.
How do Wikipedians define quality?
The short answer: METICULOUSLY.
19.
Wikipedia readership
Quality as determined by the “Wikipedia 1.0” system
Article Monthly Quality
Views
1 Bicycle safety 2120 Start
2 Bicycle helmet 7324 B
3 BH laws by country 869 Start
4 BHs in New Zealand 518 B
5 BHs in Australia 626 Start
6 BHs in the US 219 stub
7 BH laws 1334 Start
8 BH Safety Institute 114 stub
20.
Context
● Open research video:
enwp.org/File:Open_research.ogg
● Citizen science example:
Personal Genome Project site and related blog post