Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Internationalization process of the university of missouri


Published on

International higher education has existed in one form or another in the United States since the inception of the first postsecondary institutions. In fact, the University of Missouri welcomed international students before women and African Americans (MU Diversity, 2015). This research paper uses archival artifacts to make meaning of past events and identify clear internationalization stages at MU.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Internationalization process of the university of missouri

  1. 1. Internationalization Process of the University of Missouri-Columbia (MU) Primary Source Paper Summary History of Higher Education By: Patrick Arsenault
  2. 2. Overview • Definition of Internationalization in the Higher Education Context • Research Question • Rationales for Research • Significance of MU’s Internationalization • Historical Context • Research Methods & Researcher’s lenses • Results • Limitations • Opportunities for Future Research Projects
  3. 3. Definition of Internationalization in the Higher Education Context • International higher education has existed in one form or another in the United States since the inception of the first postsecondary institutions • International Higher Education can mean different things to different people; it is multifaceted. • For the purpose of my paper internationalization of higher education will be: “the increase in the number of international students enrolled or adapting practices to better support international students (recruitment, involvement, retention, etc.)”. What does it mean?
  4. 4. Research Question Historically, what have been the internationalization stages of MU? What do I want to find out?
  5. 5. Rationales for Research • Green and Olson (2003) argued that internationalization of education was a process that is slow and cumulative, which is why I have chosen to retrace the “stages” of the internationalization process of MU. • Eckel and King (2008) argue that international higher education came to be and developed in a plethora of different ways given the heterogeneous higher education setting in the United States. As a result, there are not standard practices and this validates the value of looking specifically at one institution. • Education policy makers tend to look more at the future than the past. Making valid predictions with limited data available is difficult. Increased understanding about the work that has already been done in terms of internationalizing its student body will help inform future policies at MU and provide valuable insights to other institutions who are involved in internationalization projects (American Council on Education, 1982). Why is this question important?
  6. 6. Significance of MU’s Internationalization • 3,000 international students from more than 110 countries at MU (around 10% vs. 7% for African Americans) in 2015 only (MU International Center, 2015). • $615,146,159 injected in the local economy through direct expenditure of international students in Missouri (MU has the most international students) (Institute of International Education, 2015). • That is especially important given the highly competitive and market- driven American ecosystem; private businesses, governments and institutions value campus internationalization for its economic benefit (Green and Olson, 2003). • Above and beyond financial reasons, “the millions of people who have studied in the United States over the years constitute a remarkable reservoir of goodwill for [the U.S.], perhaps [its] most undervalued foreign policy asset” (NAFSA, 2003, p.5) Why does international education matter?
  7. 7. Historical Context • The first international student came in 1849; the historical context is hard to pin down, as it covers more than 160 years of immense social change in the U.S. (Foreign Students at M. U.). • The United States has consistently been the top host country for international students in the world (data available from 1968) (Gürüz, 2008) • The four drivers of internationalization are: Social/cultural, Political, Economic and Academic (Knight, 2008). How did internationalization of higher education happen?
  8. 8. Methodology • Secondary data: Using published studies and books that talk about higher education policies and how that relate to MU. • Primary data through archival research (qualitative documents) e.g. memorandums, newspaper articles, enrollment lists and a program review. How did I collect data?
  9. 9. Research Lenses • International student (in several countries before coming to the U.S.) • Non-native English speaker • I grew up in the 1990’s What are my intrinsic biases?
  10. 10. Results • Coincidental (1849-1967) MU did not invest significant time or resources in attracting students from abroad and there is evidence that several students had not originally planned to attend MU.
  11. 11. Results (Continued) • Deliberate to Structured (1968-1995) Internationalization became more deliberate, but also better structured with key stakeholders in place like the President of the Student Association, strong internationally themed programs like IEP, the steady increase of the number of international students, the growth of the Center for International Programs and Studies, the introduction of an international student fee, and the strategic alignment of internationalization activities with the core mission of the institution.
  12. 12. Results (Continued) • Internally and Externally Monitored (1996-2015) Following the terrorist attacks of 2001, the Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS) became much more interested in international students and invested $36.1 million to develop the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS). From that point on, internationalization of higher education at MU and across the nation became closely monitored by the federal government. MU was one of the first institutions to use SEVIS (precursor).
  13. 13. Limitations • Availability of archival materials (sometimes incomplete or protected) • The way data was tracked at the earlier stages. The only way to know if a student is an international student is often to look at home address. • Time to perform the study • Length of the final paper (considering the large timespan that had to be covered)
  14. 14. Opportunities for Future Research • How does MU’s stages of internationalization align (or not) with similar institutions? • Was the experience of students at MU different from one stage to another; if so, how? • Historically, what are the stages of MU’s internationalization, when specifically looking at study abroad?
  15. 15. References • Baskin, C. (1979). International students: Super-glue for tomorrow’s world?. Missouri Alumnus, March-April Issue. Retrieved from idx?c=alum;cc=alum;sid=8371cfac34b00f1090947eb51866da4f;q1=international%20student;rgn=full%20text;idno=alum1979 03;view=image;seq=1 • Brickman, W. W. (1965). Historical development of governmental interest in international higher education. In Fraser, S. (Ed.), Governmental Policy and International Education (pp. 17-46). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. • Fledstein, J. F. (2001, November 1). INS seeks all MU foreign student records. Columbia Daily Tribune, p. 8. • Green, M. F., & Olson, C. L. (2008). Internationalizing the campus: A user's guide. American Council on Education, Center for Institutional and International Initiatives. • Gürüz, K. (2008). Higher Education and international student mobility in the global knowledge Economy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press • Hager, M. (2011). MU introduces new international student fee. The Maneater. Retrieved from • Hser, M. P. (2005). Campus internationalization: a study of American universities’ internationalization efforts. International Education, 35(1), 35-48.
  16. 16. References (Continued) • Institute of International Education. (2015). Open doors factsheet: Missouri. Retrieved from • International Student Heads Student Body. (ca. 1976). OPI, Office of Visitor Relations, Committee and Professional materials (cont'd) (UW: C:1/51/8, Box 6) . University of Missouri Archives, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO. • Knight, J. (2001). Internationalisation of higher education; a conceptual framework. In J. Knight & H. de Wit (Ed.), Internationalisation of higher education in Asia Pacific countries, 14, 249-259. • Missouri’s Foreign Students. (1907, May 25). UMC; Student Life & Activities; Newspapers; MSU Independent (UW: C:22/3/5, OSB 2). University of Missouri Archives, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO. • MU Archives. (2015). University Archives, Retrieved from • MU Diversity. (2015). Statistics and Demographics: Ethnic/Racial Distribution Comparisons at MU. Retrieved from • MU International Center. (2015a). Global Mizzou: Facts and figures. Retrieved from • MU International Center. (2015b). Council on International Initiatives. Retrieved from • NAFSA. (2003). In America’s interest: Welcoming international students. Report of the Strategic Task Force on International Student Access, January, 1-26.
  17. 17. References (Continued) • Our Foreign Enrollment. (1905, April 1). UMC; Student Life & Activities; Newspapers; MSU Independent (UW: C/22/35, OSB 2). University of Missouri Archives, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO. • Paletta, D. (2001, November 2). MU to give student records to government. Columbia Missourian, p. 7. • Program Review: Center for International Programs and Studies. (May 1984). Box 4, Program Review Advisory Committee (UW: C:6/24/13, Box 4). University of Missouri Archives, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO. • Raechele L. Pope, John A. Mueller, & Amy L. Reynolds. (2009). Looking back and moving forward: Future directions for diversity research in student affairs. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6 November/December), 640–658. • Ruther, N. L. (2014). Barely there, powerfully present: Years of US policy on international higher education. New York, NY: Routledge. • Thelin, J. R. (2011). A history of American higher education (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. • U.S. Department of Justice. (December 11, 2002). Student and Exchange Visitor Information System. Retrieved from • U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2015). Student and Exchange Visitor Information System. Retrieved from
  18. 18. References (Continued) • University of Missouri. (2015a). History of the University of Missouri. Retrieved from mu.php • University of the State of Missouri. Foreign students at M.U. (1849-1900). [Annotated Registration list]. UMC; University General; Catalogs, Bulletins and Other Publications (UW: C:0/51/1, Series 4). University of Missouri Archives, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO. • Vermillon, M. (1989). Opening doors to a global classroom. Missouri Alumnus, Winter Issue. Retrieved from idx?c=alum;cc=alum;sid=8371cfac34b00f1090947eb51866da4f;q1=international%20center;rgn=full%20text;idno=alum1989 winter;view=image;seq=1 • Vestal, T. M. (1994). International education: Its history and promise for today. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  19. 19. Thank You! Patrick Arsenault, M.Sc. Email: Twitter: PaArsenault Instagram: PaArsenault LinkedIn: * Full Bibliography Available Upon Request *