Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Stephanie knaak drinking during pregnancy-kent 2011


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Stephanie knaak drinking during pregnancy-kent 2011

  1. 1. Medicalization, moral control, and risk adverse parenting: Examining the ‘no drinking’ rule Stephanie Knaak, Ph.D.Calgary,<br />Prepared for presentation for Monitoring Parents: Science, evidence and the new parenting culture, University of Kent, Canterbury, September 13-14, 2011.<br />
  2. 2. Purpose<br />Unpack the ‘no drinking during pregnancy’ discourse <br />Making some observations about the policy itself (Cdn context)<br />Cultural uptake <br />Discuss policy in relation to the state of the scientific evidence <br />Tie observations into a larger argument about how medical authority active player in shaping the psyche of modern motherhood.<br />Paper still in formation<br />
  3. 3. Theoretical premise <br /> “Medicine is becoming a major institution of social control, nudging aside, if not incorporating, the more traditional institutions of religion and law. It is becoming the new repository of truth, the place where absolute and often final judgments are made, not in the name of virtue or legitimacy, but in the name of health. Moreover, this is not occurring through the political power physicians hold or can influence, but is largely an insidious and often undramatic phenomenon accomplished by ‘medicalizing’ much of daily living.” (Zola, 1972: 183)<br />
  4. 4. Canada’s Policy<br />Health Canada/Public Health Agency of Canada recommend that any woman who is pregnant or at risk for pregnancy should abstain from alcohol consumption<br />Recommendation for abstention discussed nearly exclusively in context of FASD risk.<br />Public Health Agency of Canada has multi-faceted strategy<br />Level 1: broad-based awareness and health promotion<br />Level 2: Brief counselling with pregnant & pre-pregnant women about alcohol use and pregnancy<br />Level 3: Specialized prenatal support/treatment for pregnant women with addictions and alcohol dependency<br />Level 4: Postpartum support for mothers with alcohol problems; may involve early intervention services for their children<br />
  5. 5. Public Health Agency of CanadaHealthy Pregnancy: Alcohol and Pregnancy `2008; located at<br />Important Facts<br /> THERE IS NO SAFE AMOUNT OR SAFE TIME TO DRINK ALCOHOL DURING PREGNANCY<br /> If you drink alcohol while you are pregnant, you are at risk of giving birth to a baby with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD).FASD is a term that describes a range of disabilities (physical, social, mental/emotional) that may affect people whose birth mothers drank alcohol while they were pregnant. FASD may include problems with learning and/or behaviour, doing math, thinking things through, learning from experience, understanding the consequences of his or her actions, and remembering things. Your child could also have trouble in social situations and getting along with others. People with FASD may be small, they may have behaviour and/or learning problems, and their faces may look different. Research shows that children born to mothers who drank as little as one drink per day during pregnancy may have behaviour and learning problems.<br /> No one knows how much alcohol it takes to harm a developing baby. When you drink alcohol during pregnancy, it rapidly reaches your baby through your bloodstream. The effect of alcohol on the developing baby can vary depending on the health of the pregnant woman and also the amount, pattern and timing of drinking alcohol during pregnancy. Binge drinking (drinking a large amount of alcohol in a short amount of time) is especially bad for the developing baby.<br />Next Steps<br /> Whether you are trying to get pregnant or are pregnant already, stop drinking alcohol. No alcohol is the best (and the safest!) choice for having a healthy baby.<br />
  6. 6. Ontario<br />
  7. 7.
  8. 8. Common features<br />Language of Risk<br />Language of Harm<br />Emphasis on ‘no amount is safe;’ ‘no time is safe’<br />Unequivocal in tone<br />‘Where to go for help’ at end<br />
  9. 9. Message received? <br />Attitudinal measures – general population: *<br />95% believe that alcohol consumption during pregnancy can lead to life-long disability in the child<br />76% believe that any alcohol during pregnancy is harmful to the baby<br />52% say, top of mind, the single most important thing a woman can do for a healthy pregnancy is to stop drinking <br />Drinking during pregnancy estimates:**<br />10.5% of women report drinking any alcohol at all during pregnancy <br />0.7% of women drank frequently (once a week or more)<br />``Self-reports of alcohol consumption may be underestimated due to the potential under-reporting of socially undesirable behaviours by mothers`` (p. 89)<br />* Alcohol use during pregnancy and awareness of FAS and FASD; Environics Research Group for PHAC, 2006<br />**What Mothers Say: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey; Public Health Agency of Canada, 2009<br />
  10. 10. But is the message correct?<br />Science/policy mismatch, especially for light drinking<br />e.g., Kelly et al., 2010; Kelly et al., 2009; Alati et al., 2008; Robinson et al., 2010; O’Leary , 2009; O’Callaghan et al, 2007 all show no increased risk of social/emotional problems or lower cognitive test scores among children born to light drinkers (1-2/per occasion/week)<br />See also O’Brien, 2007; Lowe and Lee, 2010; Armstrong 2003; Sayal et al, 2007; UK Department of Health, 2007; other<br />What conclusions must be drawn when research upon which the legitimacy of the discourse is based reveals itself to be much more equivocal, thin, contradictory, controversial than the discourse would have us believe?<br />Function of the discourse is not to provide a informative tool to aid in rational decision-making. Rather, it is to promote a certain belief/viewpoint about appropriate maternal behaviour without having to acknowledge that it is just that – a viewpoint. Authoritative origin of the message obscures this very important point. “Health education campaigns, in their efforts to persuade, have the potential to manipulate information deceptively and to psychologically manipulate by appealing to people’s emotions, fears, anxieties, and guilt feelings....Health education can be coercive when it gives only one side of the argument.” (Lupton 1993: 431)<br />
  11. 11. Shaping the Psyche of Modern Motherhood<br />Cultural saturation (and internalization) of the discourse key – allows for the monitoring/gatekeeping of maternal behaviour to function insidiously; seeps into the nooks and crannies of everyday life. <br />Moral straightjacketing of maternal behaviour. “The discourse of risk ostensibly gives people a choice, but the rhetoric in which the choice is couched leaves no room for maneuver.” (Lupton, 1993: 433). In Cdn context, language of choice discursively absent<br />These features are what give the no drinking discourse its ability to function as such an effective mechanism of social control<br />
  12. 12. Shaping the Psyche of Modern Motherhood<br />Number of implicit ideas/assumptions about babies and mothers embedded in the no drinking discourse <br />These assumptions/ideas absorbed into the cultural psyche along with the actual ‘no drinking’ prescription (cultural saturation / internalization of the message does not occur unless the assumptions upon which it is based are also adopted)<br />Builds up/reinforces the idea that children are easily harmed; fragile, inherently vulnerable. ; damage can be severe, irreversible and lifelong<br />Builds up/reinforces a parenting mindset that is hyper-sensitive to risk and also keenly risk adverse <br />Builds up/reinforces the corollary risk=danger=avoid at all costs<br />Builds up/reinforces the idea that children require protection from ‘outside;’ parents (i.e., mothers) need watching over (Identification of risk may not be common-sensical; expert authority needed to ‘teach’ mothers about proper risk perception and management) <br />Builds up/reinforces the idea that one of the key ‘risks’ to a child is the mother herself (i.e., through bad ‘lifestyle choices’); normalises expectations for a ‘perfecting’ standard for maternal behaviour, also normalises moral surveillance of maternal behaviour<br />