Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

The Gap Between DevTest and the Business

478 views

Published on

There is a tremendous gap between DevTest activities and business expectations for software. This disconnect causes a gap that can ultimately expose the company to a bumpy user experience, erratic system behavior and standards and regulatory compliance risk. Learn what needs to change to close the gap and improve software quality. Visit: http://bit.ly/28NGOzP to learn more.

Published in: Technology
  • D0WNL0AD FULL ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ http://1url.pw/WdBIU ◀ ◀ ◀ ◀
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

The Gap Between DevTest and the Business

  1. 1. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 1 2016-07-15 The Gap Between Business Risks and Software: How Teams Measure Non-functional Requirements
  2. 2. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 22 Acceleration of the software development lifecycle Innovative software that bonds customers to its products and services Every business demands: Speed Quality Speed and quality are no longer tradeoffs: modern organizations must have both Software Development Lifecycle Trends
  3. 3. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 33 Speed and Quality: What Does That Mean? NFRs We must understand the business risk of a release candidate Different parts of the organization think about speed and quality differently Business Person Developer Tester I’m not done testing yet! Are we done yet? Is the user story complete?
  4. 4. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 44 What Is a Non-functional Requirement (NFR)? NFR Examples NFRs describe how the overall system should behave Application resiliency Accessibility Availability Reliability Testability Regulatory compliance
  5. 5. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 55 Parasoft Study Explored the Evolution of Quality across Dev Methodology To explore the impact of the accelerated SDLC, Parasoft conducted a survey asking software developers about functional and non-functional requirements of Waterfall teams who do so …compared with 59% Only 38% of Agile-ish and Agile teams are monitoring NFRs… 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Agile-Ish Agile Iterative Hybrid Waterfall “Yes, my team monitors compliance to non-functional requirements (NFRs)”
  6. 6. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 66 Is Agile Compromising Quality in Pursuit of Speed? Agile’s quick iterative approach focuses test teams on bottom up user stories Testers focus on new user stories Non-functional requirements are deprioritized * The Business Risks of the Release Pipeline Survey Results: How Teams Measure Non-Functional Requirements, 2016; commissioned by Parasoft The Result
  7. 7. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 77 Study Findings – INVERSE Correlation Between SDLC Pace and NFR Measurement Inverse correlation between Agile methodologies and the likelihood that teams will measure NFR compliance Agile’s speed leaves little time for testing NFRs Agile Sprint 1 Sprint 2 Sprint 3 Waterfall’s slower pace leaves more time for testing NFRs Waterfall Develop Discover Design Test
  8. 8. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 88 Measurement of NFRs Management and business analysts are 7x more likely to believe that NFRs are measures and monitored consistently Developers and testers do not believe that NFRs are being appropriately defined and measured
  9. 9. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 99 Gap Between the Business and Dev Team The Business Dev Team Deadline pressures result in ignoring:  Holistic user experience  Impact of change on the broader system  NFRs Assumes business risks are being mitigated—but neglected NFRs can expose the company to:  Bumpy user experience  Erratic system behavior  Standards and regulatory compliance risk Software quality
  10. 10. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 1010 Closing the Gap Between the Business and the Dev Team  Jointly defining business risks at project’s onset  Understanding KPIs and acceptance thresholds  Automatically measuring and monitoring NFRs  Reviewing and continuously improving mitigation of business risk Better Software Quality
  11. 11. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 1111 Recommendations for Quality @ Speed  Ensure all parties understand risks and tradeoffs  Continuously train on the impact of failure  Establish quality gates  Implement escalation processes  Adopt a continuous improvement mindset To rapidly assess the risks of releasing applications: Security Availability Compliance Quality Reliability
  12. 12. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 1212 Teams Must Collaborate to Mitigate Risk  Business risks drive quality activities  Teams collaborate on the definition of risk  All team members are trained on risks and mitigation tasks  Baseline and threshold criteria are measured and monitored  DevTest team activities are prioritized per risk definition Policy NFRs KPIs and Acceptance Thresholds Automated Measurement and Monitoring
  13. 13. Copyright © 2016 Parasoft 13 2016-07-15 Download Report www.parasoft.com To learn more

×