Better Hackathon 2020 - WFP - Enhancing Agricultural Mapping With BETTER Pipelines

P
Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
WFP - BETTER Hackathon – 23rd October 2020
Big-data Earth observation Technology and Tools Enhancing Research and development
http://ec-better.eu
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation
Programme under grant agreement no 776280
Relevance for WFP
Changes in Agricultural Area under Conflict
Crop type mapping in conflict areas:
Quantify losses of cropland and post-conflict
regeneration. First time cropland baseline
(e.g. South Sudan)
Technical assistance to governments:
In close cooperation with Min of Agriculture.
Smallholder support systems:
Assess seasonal performance potential,
likelihood of meeting procurement targets,
changes staple-cash crop in area of
intervention.
WFP Project Interventions:
Agriculture oriented FFA projects, resilience
building interventions, index insurance.
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
Sentinel-2
Data Assimilation Cloud
Storage and
Processing
Centre
Crop Type Map
ONA Platform
Assimilation, Quality
Control, Conversion
Sen2Agri System
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
Crop Type
Ground Data Collection
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
Preferred option: Geo-referenced perimeters
Field Data
Large Fields along roads:
Geo-referenced Transects
Field Capture
Office
Completion
Huge Fields: Single Points / Corners
Better Hackathon 2020 - WFP - Enhancing Agricultural Mapping With BETTER Pipelines
http://ec-better.eu
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
Sen2Agri has served its purpose well. However:
• It only uses S2 and L8, but no SAR.
• There is a module for atmospheric correction but significant atmospheric
interference may still have an impact on the quality of the classification
WFP ClEO Team has implemented a flexible,
data-driven, pixel-optimized filter:
• So far routinely applied to medium resolution
data, NDVI and LST – smooth, clean images
without mosaicking artifacts or cloud inflicted
gaps.
• Can we apply the same to Sentinel-2 data?
Good for hazard mapping, but is there a
benefit for crop type (or more generally land
cover) classification
http://ec-better.eu
Jan-Oct 2019
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
http://ec-better.eu
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
Filter behavior is modulated by two
parameters:
• S – controls the amount of smoothing
that is applied. The smaller the S, the
closer to the original data the output is.
At the extremes the output will be a
polynomial of degree n (usually 1 or 2).
• S can be optimized (CV, V-curve)
http://ec-better.eu
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
Filter behavior is modulated by two parameters:
• p – controls the asymmetry of the filtered
output and is a value between 0 and 1. When
p is 0.5, filtered output balances noise. As p
tends to 1 the filter fits the output to the
higher envelope of the signal. As p tends to
0 the filter fits to the lower envelope of the
signal (baseline) .
• NDVI: use p > 0.5
• Reflectances: use p < 0.5
• p is not optimized, expert judgement
http://ec-better.eu
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
Data Set:
• 8800 time series of raw and smoothed Sentinel-2 reflectances and SAR
• Smoothing: S = optimized btn 3.0-4.0 and p=0.2 (p=0.3 for Band 8, 11 and 12)
• Nature: pixels selected inside each agronomic data sample, 25m distance
• Field data: Crop field outlines, collected early October 2020 (pre-harvest)
• Location: Adamawa State, NE Nigeria
• Dates: Time series from May to October 2020
• Crop Types: Maize, Millet, Sorghum, Beans, Soya and their mixes. Also fallow
(unused) and No-ID (abandoned field)
• 7000 labelled data and 1800 unlabelled
http://ec-better.eu
BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
The Exercise:
• Devise a classifier for crop types to be run with the various datasets provided
and results compared
• You are free to choose combinations of data. E.g.
• Raw S2 vs Filtered S2
• Raw S2 + SAR vs Filtered S2
• SAR vs Filtered S2
• … whatever
• You can team up if you want
• Produce your predictions for the unlabeled data and submit
Google Hangouts for Bilateral Support:
https://meet.google.com/mde-useo-qrb
Enjoy the Work! Thank You!
http://ec-better.eu
1 of 12

More Related Content

What's hot(20)

Gis applications & ImplementGis applications & Implement
Gis applications & Implement
RAQIBSTELEGRAPH72 views
Arab Spatial for nexus mapping  modeling the water-food-energy nexus in the a...Arab Spatial for nexus mapping  modeling the water-food-energy nexus in the a...
Arab Spatial for nexus mapping modeling the water-food-energy nexus in the a...
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)697 views
Intervention: India- IrrigationIntervention: India- Irrigation
Intervention: India- Irrigation
ExternalEvents345 views
Impact of Precision Agriculture -  Terry Griffin - 5Impact of Precision Agriculture -  Terry Griffin - 5
Impact of Precision Agriculture - Terry Griffin - 5
EasternOntarioCropConference353 views
IFPRI-Using new technologies to validating Crop-Cutting Experiments-Michael MannIFPRI-Using new technologies to validating Crop-Cutting Experiments-Michael Mann
IFPRI-Using new technologies to validating Crop-Cutting Experiments-Michael Mann
International Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office687 views
Andrea Cruciani, AgricolusAndrea Cruciani, Agricolus
Andrea Cruciani, Agricolus
Data Driven Innovation252 views
Precision Management - Nicole Rabe and Sarah Lepp - 12Precision Management - Nicole Rabe and Sarah Lepp - 12
Precision Management - Nicole Rabe and Sarah Lepp - 12
EasternOntarioCropConference608 views
Sri Lanka - Household food securitySri Lanka - Household food security
Sri Lanka - Household food security
ExternalEvents1.3K views
Web GIS for fisheries - case study from West Bengal, IndiaWeb GIS for fisheries - case study from West Bengal, India
Web GIS for fisheries - case study from West Bengal, India
Geospatial Media & Communications5.8K views

Similar to Better Hackathon 2020 - WFP - Enhancing Agricultural Mapping With BETTER Pipelines(20)

IFPRI-Leveraging CropSnap in yield estimation-MallikarjunIFPRI-Leveraging CropSnap in yield estimation-Mallikarjun
IFPRI-Leveraging CropSnap in yield estimation-Mallikarjun
International Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office388 views
IFPRI-Using Remote Sensing technologies to improve sampling-Mangesh PatankarIFPRI-Using Remote Sensing technologies to improve sampling-Mangesh Patankar
IFPRI-Using Remote Sensing technologies to improve sampling-Mangesh Patankar
International Food Policy Research Institute- South Asia Office652 views
Crop yield prediction.pdfCrop yield prediction.pdf
Crop yield prediction.pdf
ssuserb22f5a404 views
Smart ICT for Weather and Water Advice to Smallholders in AfricaSmart ICT for Weather and Water Advice to Smallholders in Africa
Smart ICT for Weather and Water Advice to Smallholders in Africa
Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation ACP-EU (CTA)1.2K views
Precision agriculturePrecision agriculture
Precision agriculture
Aboul Ella Hassanien17.6K views
Agri futureAgri future
Agri future
Prashanth Panduranga227 views

Better Hackathon 2020 - WFP - Enhancing Agricultural Mapping With BETTER Pipelines

  • 1. Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines WFP - BETTER Hackathon – 23rd October 2020 Big-data Earth observation Technology and Tools Enhancing Research and development http://ec-better.eu This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement no 776280
  • 2. Relevance for WFP Changes in Agricultural Area under Conflict Crop type mapping in conflict areas: Quantify losses of cropland and post-conflict regeneration. First time cropland baseline (e.g. South Sudan) Technical assistance to governments: In close cooperation with Min of Agriculture. Smallholder support systems: Assess seasonal performance potential, likelihood of meeting procurement targets, changes staple-cash crop in area of intervention. WFP Project Interventions: Agriculture oriented FFA projects, resilience building interventions, index insurance. BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
  • 3. Sentinel-2 Data Assimilation Cloud Storage and Processing Centre Crop Type Map ONA Platform Assimilation, Quality Control, Conversion Sen2Agri System BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines Crop Type Ground Data Collection
  • 4. BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines Preferred option: Geo-referenced perimeters Field Data Large Fields along roads: Geo-referenced Transects Field Capture Office Completion Huge Fields: Single Points / Corners
  • 6. http://ec-better.eu BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines Sen2Agri has served its purpose well. However: • It only uses S2 and L8, but no SAR. • There is a module for atmospheric correction but significant atmospheric interference may still have an impact on the quality of the classification WFP ClEO Team has implemented a flexible, data-driven, pixel-optimized filter: • So far routinely applied to medium resolution data, NDVI and LST – smooth, clean images without mosaicking artifacts or cloud inflicted gaps. • Can we apply the same to Sentinel-2 data? Good for hazard mapping, but is there a benefit for crop type (or more generally land cover) classification
  • 7. http://ec-better.eu Jan-Oct 2019 BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines
  • 8. http://ec-better.eu BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines Filter behavior is modulated by two parameters: • S – controls the amount of smoothing that is applied. The smaller the S, the closer to the original data the output is. At the extremes the output will be a polynomial of degree n (usually 1 or 2). • S can be optimized (CV, V-curve)
  • 9. http://ec-better.eu BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines Filter behavior is modulated by two parameters: • p – controls the asymmetry of the filtered output and is a value between 0 and 1. When p is 0.5, filtered output balances noise. As p tends to 1 the filter fits the output to the higher envelope of the signal. As p tends to 0 the filter fits to the lower envelope of the signal (baseline) . • NDVI: use p > 0.5 • Reflectances: use p < 0.5 • p is not optimized, expert judgement
  • 10. http://ec-better.eu BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines Data Set: • 8800 time series of raw and smoothed Sentinel-2 reflectances and SAR • Smoothing: S = optimized btn 3.0-4.0 and p=0.2 (p=0.3 for Band 8, 11 and 12) • Nature: pixels selected inside each agronomic data sample, 25m distance • Field data: Crop field outlines, collected early October 2020 (pre-harvest) • Location: Adamawa State, NE Nigeria • Dates: Time series from May to October 2020 • Crop Types: Maize, Millet, Sorghum, Beans, Soya and their mixes. Also fallow (unused) and No-ID (abandoned field) • 7000 labelled data and 1800 unlabelled
  • 11. http://ec-better.eu BETTER | Enhancing Agricultural Mapping with BETTER Pipelines The Exercise: • Devise a classifier for crop types to be run with the various datasets provided and results compared • You are free to choose combinations of data. E.g. • Raw S2 vs Filtered S2 • Raw S2 + SAR vs Filtered S2 • SAR vs Filtered S2 • … whatever • You can team up if you want • Produce your predictions for the unlabeled data and submit Google Hangouts for Bilateral Support: https://meet.google.com/mde-useo-qrb
  • 12. Enjoy the Work! Thank You! http://ec-better.eu