This presentation is designed to show the costs of Ignalina NPP decommissioning

1. IGNALINA NPP: REORGANIZATION FOR DECOMMISSIONING AND NEW FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE 2014 - 2020 Osvaldas Čiukšys INPP CORPORATE DIRECTOR 10 May 2011 Embassy of the Republic of Lithuania, Stockholm

7. BUDGET OF INPP: 2010 Fact and 2011 Approved LT Budget 6,42 % NDF 12,37 % INPP own funds 1,73 % IP (C PMA ) 47,59 % IIDSF (EBRD ) 31,89 % LT Budget 3,99 % NDF 4,21 % INPP own funds 3,30 % IP (CP M A) 41,06 % IIDSF (E BRD ) 47,44 % 20,52 % 79,48 % 11,50 % 88,50 % 2010 Factual budget 109.5 mln EUR: Economy of 32.1 mln EUR or 22.7 % from approved 2010 budget 2011 planned budget 190.2 mln EUR : Based on 2010 factual budget implementation and concentrated on key decom projects with allocation of 102 mln EUR EU 79.48 % LT 20.52 % EU 88.50 % LT 11.50 %

8. KPIs FOR 2011 BASED ON SMART PRINCIPLES BOARD ADOPTED & COMMUNICATED TO MASS MEDIA

12. Dismantling activities (1) Open Nitrogen-and Hydrogen-Receiving Facility 2010-08 2010-08 2010-10-08

16. Overall schedule Unit 1 activities Unit 2 activities General site activities Dismantling & Decontamination SWMSF Dismantling & Decontamination Fuel in core Fuel in pools Fuel fully removed Fuel in core Fuel in pools Fuel fully removed Site Operation & Maintenance Demolition D&D Post-operation Operation Operation Post-operation Opening waste management routes (Design & construction ) Global Decommissioning Program / Final Decommissioningg Plan 2001-2010 20 1 1-20 2 0 20 2 1-20 3 0 ISFSF Landfill Facility Near Surface Repository

17. Key decommissioning projects before reactors dismantling Project B1 ISFSF B234 SWMSF B19 Landfill B25 Repository Status : Construction Delay 3 years Construction Delay 3-4 years Design B19/1 Buffer storage facility being released in 2011 Design Price : 193 m ln. Eur 12 3 m ln. Eur 30 m ln. Eur ~ 290 m ln. Eur Total : ~ 6 20 m ln. Eur

19. Breakdown by Generic Costs Adjustments 460m € Other Investments & Procurements 38% (2011) 640m € 320m € +160m€ +140m € 870m € Major Facilities 28% (2011) Staffing 20% (2011) Energy 14% (2011) 450m € +150m € Staffing 23% (adjusted) Energy 17% (adjusted) Major Facilities, Investments & Procurements 60% (adjusted) (2012-2029) Total cost: 2290 m Euro (at 2011 prices) +1 6 0m € +1 4 0m € 460 m €

20. Ignalina NPP Staffing 2001-2003 2000 2004-2009 2010-2012 2013-2016 500 1400 2017-2023 1100 500 3900 2800 2024-2026 2027-2029 4600 Staff attributable to the cost of post-operation and dismantling Unit 1 closure 600 End of unit dismantling End of defuelling 2250 Unit 2 closure 2000 New skills End of all D&D 1800 End of demolition INPP applies “in house” project implementation strategy which allows to optimize costs as well as use own staff and gain new know - how

21. Assumptions Field Assumption Justification Overall decommissioning Global Decommissioning Plan (GDP) has identified all possible costs GDP was built-up from estimates developed and refined successively in successive planning documents (PDP, FDP, U1DP0, etc.). GDP accounts for real costs over 2000-2010 and further development of ongoing projects. Reactor dismantling GDP assumes immediate dismantling FDP concluded that dismantling of reactors is possible and foresees long-term interim storage of associated “orphan” waste. Macroeconomic Rises in salaries, energy costs and other prices do not exceed the values presented Macroeconomic study commissioned by Ministry of Energy based on best available data.

22. Risks Other? Field Risk Quantification of impact Design & Build Major Investment Projects (ongoing) Additional works, changes in regulatory requirements 20% (60 m Euro approx.) Excludes indirect impact of any further delays. Build-only Major Investment Projects (planned) Additional works, changes in regulatory requirements 15% (50 m Euro approx.) Reactor dismantling Revisions of scope and unforeseeable variations 50% (20 m Euro approx.) Bitumized waste Upgrading of interim storage into long-term near surface disposal (foreseen in GDP based on preliminary study) is not possible. 50 m Euro (approx.) 14,000 m 3 to be retrieved conditioned and disposed of in NSR Other Investments derived from Final Decommissioning Plan Revisions of scope and unforeseeable variations 10% (10 m Euro approx.) Total 190 m Euro (approx.)

27. Comparison with Greifswald NPP Operational Solid Waste (to be retrieved and managed) Operational Spent Resins (for cementation) 30,000 m 3 15,000 m 3 5,800 m 3 2,000 m 3 Steel from Equipt. Dismantling contaminated 59% 91% 130,000 tons 116,000 tons Steel Steel Graphite Shielding (serpentine / sand) Required Spent Fuel Casks (for interim storage) 190 (additional) 61 17,100 tons 2,300 t Reactor Core Structures 2,660 tons 3,800 t 11,000 t 6 x 440 MWe VVER Greifswald NP P Ignalina NPP 2 x 1500 MWe RBMK

30. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! QUESTIONS? [email_address] www.iae.lt

37. 2011 2014 2017 2020 TOTAL TIMESCALE R1&R2 ( Unit 1) W P 1. Engineering studies for dismantling W P 2. Radiological surveys W P 3 . Development of the design documentation W P 4. Approval of the design documentation by the state authorities W P 5. P reparatory works for dismantling Dismantling for R1 and R2. According to a separate schedule R3 ( Unit 1) W P 6. Engineering studies W P 7. Development of the design documentation W P 8. Approval of the design documentation by the state authorities Dismantling for R3. According to a separate schedule R1&R2&R3 ( Unit 2) W P 9. Recurrence, adaptation of work packages for Unit 2 Dismantling for R3. According to a separate schedule 2013 TIMETABLE

39. ESSENTIAL TASK – GRAPHITE MANAGEMENT Anthony Benford National Laboratory in the UK Michael Grave Doosan Babcock owned Doosan Power Systems Ltd part Christian Glorennec (EDF) France Height: 9 m Diameter 15.17 m Weight: 2060 tonnes Bugey- 1 Height: 8 m Diameter ~ 14 m Weight: 1760 t per unit INPP drawing, code РБМ-К15.сб.05СБ

41. ESSENTIAL TASK – GRAPHITE MANAGEMENT Major Knowledge Centers IAEA CARBOWASTE EPRI/DOE British, French, German, and Russian scientists and industry Lithuanian and Ukrainian scientists

42. “ I gnalina C arbon C ompetence C enter” COMPETENCE STRENGTHENING

43. STRENGTHENING OF GRAPHITE MANAGEMENT COMPETENCE Decommissioning requirements for competence arise Decommissioning requirements for competence SATISFIED Management methods of irradiated materials Any innovations Stakeholders receive “ Know-how” competence Subject 1 Subject N Attracting investment for decommissioning Subject 2 Governing Body Scientific Technical Council Leadership experience section Innovation and Technology section Valdymo organas Mokslinė-techninė taryba Pirmaujančios patirties sekcija Inovacijų ir technologijų sekcija ARBON ENTER OMPETENCE C

44. COMPETENCE STRENGTHENING Task : to organize a conference of interested specialists in autumn 2011 Areas of essential actions Nuclear facilities wherein the works are executed Optimization of verification in real-time (number of samples, samples, methods, etc.) Bugey-1 (France) Windscale AGR (UK) AVR (Germany) RBMK-1000 ( U kraine) Other objects with graphite Explanation of verification in real-time (sampling and measurement) using released publications RBMK-1500 (Lithuania) RBMK-1000 (Russia, Ukraine) Other objects with graphite Integrated methods Bugey-1 (France) Windscale AGR (UK) Magnox (UK), Beloyarsk NPP (AMB), Amplification of designed RBMK term of service Other objects with graphite Special conditioning, treatment and disposal options Different decisions

51. I NPP INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR ENERGY SAFETY EVENTS ACCORDING TO INES SCALE 1994-2010