Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Peer Review in the Age of Open Science

543 views

Published on

Invited talk by Tony Ross-Hellauer for the 4th PUBMET2017 Conference held in Zagreb, Croatia, September 22, 2017

Published in: Science
  • Be the first to comment

Peer Review in the Age of Open Science

  1. 1. Peer Review in the Age of Open Science Tony Ross-Hellauer State and University Library Göttingen Know-Center GmbH Peer Review in the Age of Open Science #PubMet2017, Zagreb, 21 Sept 2017
  2. 2. OpenAIRE Dec. 2009 – Nov. 2012 OpenAIREplus Dec. 2011 – Dec. 2014 OpenAIRE2020 Jan. 2015 – Jun. 2018
  3. 3. Peer Review Innovative Dissemination Impact Measurement
  4. 4. • • • • •
  5. 5. • •
  6. 6. • • •
  7. 7. IN OUT
  8. 8. Historically, scholarly communication was slow, expensive and limited to a few channels
  9. 9. Transparency Accountability Inclusivity Responsibility Community & Collaboration Visibility Rigour Equality Public good Reproducibility Findability Accessibility Interoperability Re-usability Innovation Principles of Open Scholarship
  10. 10. • • • •
  11. 11. • • • • • • • Image CC BY AC McCann, w/ amendment (by me) ** 122 definitions collected and analysed ** ** 22 distinct configurations of 7 traits identified ** See: Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A systematic review", F1000Research (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)
  12. 12. Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A systematic review", F1000Research (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)
  13. 13. Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A systematic review", F1000Research (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)
  14. 14. • • • • •
  15. 15. CC0 Public Domain • • • • • • •
  16. 16. CC BY-SA Testbirds GmbH • • • • • •
  17. 17. Slide: CC BY Edit Görögh
  18. 18. Publishers Publishing platforms Independent review services Repository based review platforms & tools Review/Annotation applications Slide: CC BY Edit Görögh
  19. 19. Tennant JP, Dugan JM, Graziotin D et al. 2017, F1000Research 2017, 6:1151 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12037.1)
  20. 20. • • • • •
  21. 21. • • •
  22. 22. • • • • •
  23. 23. • • • •
  24. 24. • • • • • • • • •
  25. 25. www.openaire.eu @openaire_eu facebook.com/groups/openaire linkedin.com/groups/OpenAIRE-3893548 Thank you! [And thanks to Edit Gorogh for slides and Jon Tennant for chat]

×