Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

OpenAIRE workshop: Beyond APCs - Jeroen Sondervan (Utrecht University)


Published on

"Shut up! And give me your money! Or not? Challenges and opportunities with non-APC business models and self-publishing"

Presentation delivered during the workshop
Royal Library, The Hague, Netherlands
April 5th and 6th, 2018

Published in: Science
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

OpenAIRE workshop: Beyond APCs - Jeroen Sondervan (Utrecht University)

  1. 1. “Shut op! And give me your money!” Or not? Challenges and Opportunities with Non-APC Business Models and Self-Publishing OpenAIRE workshop Workshop: Beyond APCs: alternative open access publishing business models, April 2017 Jeroen Sondervan, Publishing Consultant, Utrecht University
  2. 2. ● Short Introduction UU/OA ● Facts & Figures (non)APC market ● Functions of Scholarly Communication ● Case: Uopen Journals ● Non-APC models/self-publishing: challenges & opportunities ● DIY: Publishing platforms Source: DOAJ (April 2018) Contents
  3. 3. ● 2004: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services ● 2005: Berlin Declaration signed & development of UU repository for (sustainable) archiving ● 2013-2014: 26+ OA journals running on OJS in Igitur ● 2015: Igitur ceased ● 2015 → New publishing service at UU: 14 full Open Access Journals (Uopen Journals Incubator model) ● 2012 - ?: OA-fund ● 2018 --> Draft Open Science Programme (2018-2020) Short Introduction UU/OA
  4. 4. On April 4, 2018: ● 11,120 peer-reviewed OA journals listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). ● 2,957 fee-based journals in the DOAJ. ● Meaning: 73% of the listed journals charge no APC. Source: DOAJ (April 2018) Facts & Figures (non)- APC Market But: Majority of articles are published in the 27% Gold APC journals (PLOS, BMC, Frontiers, etc).
  5. 5. Sources: e.g. Bjork & Solomon (2012); Finch et el (2012); JISC APC and Subscription report (2016); OpenAPC project (2018). Some more facts: ● Average APC in 2010-12: +- $1300 ● APCs increasing ever since ● APC expenditures are unevenly distributed between publishers ● Majority of APCs are paid for Hybrid OA, but: ● Average APC for full Gold OA is rising more quickly than that of hybrid journals...
  6. 6. Sources: EU Tender: Open Research Europe - The EC Open Research Publishing Platform (2018). And... ● Most offsetting deals (e.g. in the Netherlands and U.K.) based on the idea/calculation of APCs ● EC call for the OA research platform reserves budget for APCs (average = €950-1.000) So how on earth is this 73% doing the publishing thing...?
  7. 7. Basic functions: ● Registration, for claiming precedence ● Certification, for establishing validity ● Awareness, e.g. through dissemination or alerting ● Archiving, to preserve the record Additional functions/roles that journals (read: publishers) took on: ● Selection ● Facilitation of rewarding, through metrics ● Creating research communities Functions of scholarly communication Source: (adapted from Roosendaal & Geurts 1998)
  8. 8. Basic functions: •Registration, for claiming precedence → preprints •Certification, for establishing validity → open PR, statcheck, data, replication •Awareness, e.g. through dissemination or alerting → search engines, social media •Archiving, to preserve the record → repositories/archives (e.g. Zenodo) Additional functions/roles that (some) journals took on: •Selection, filtering → overlay journals, social media, semantic technology •Enabling rewarding, through metrics → ALM, altmetrics •Creating research communities → academic social networks (e.g. Hum Commons) Functions of scholarly communication: new players Source: (adapted from Roosendaal & Geurts 1998)
  9. 9. Scholarly communication evolves / Academic Publishing evolves ● What are we prepared to pay? ● And for which services? ● What can we, as academic community (researchers, libraries, institutions), do ourselves? What’s next?
  10. 10. Case: Uopen Journals
  11. 11. The Incubator ● UU community (mainly HSS and Law) ● Maximum of 6 years of library support to reach set goals ● Full Gold OA ● Partnership with Ubiquity Press ● Consultancy, network and support
  12. 12. 14 journals - 10 models
  13. 13. Irresponsible Complicated Cost of Publishing Challenges Short-term commitments (funders/grants) No ‘business’ approach Knowledge-gaps Just too many things to handle Too many dependencies ‘Too much’ qualityLack of editorial/production knowledge No clear long-term vision Scalability
  14. 14. Responsible PragmaticCost-effective Opportunities Long-term commitments (funders/libraries) Collaborations / Consortia Expertise and consultancy in scholarly publishing Growing competitive market of publishing platforms Investing in shared commons/infra Be realistic Be on time Know your ‘market’ / community Financial planning
  15. 15. Responsible PragmaticCost-effective Opportunities Quality OA
  16. 16. Thank you! Questions? @jeroenson