Suppression of letter dated 23.03.2017 of petitioner in Office Report dated 25.03.2017 resulted in Planned Murder/Encounter of Petitioners.

1. Widow Asha Rani Devi Mother of Om Prakash Poddar
<om.poddar@gmail.com>
Cure to the Notification of defects letter vide diary no. 5356/2016/X dated
23.03.2017 -reg.
1 message
Om Prakash Poddar <om.poddar@gmail.com> Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:53 PM
To: "Section X, Supreme Court of India" <sec.x@sci.nic.in>
To,
The Registrar (Miscellaneous)
Section X
Supreme Court of India
New Delhi
Sub: Cure to the Notification of defects letter vide
diary no. 5356/2016/X dated 23.03.2017 -reg.
Hon’ble Madam,
1. That the application for withdrawal of
Curative Petition vide Crl. M.P.NO………2017(Diary
No.19917/2017) is defective as a portion of
prayer (b), which reads as “……and issue a NOTICE
for appearance against D.NO. 16166 of 2017
and D.NO. 17593 OF 2017 for urgent relief”, is
not maintainable and is to be removed from the
application.

2. 2.That the petitioner does not want to remove
prayer (b) because the petitioner has not given
his consent to list the defective matter before
Hon’ble Judges in Chamber vide email letter dated
25.01.2017 and Registrar is forcibly listing it
on 27.03.2017.
3.That the petitioner has been forcibly pushed
into curative stage by the Registry through
suppressing his record of application dated
03.10.2016 to agitate the matter before Hon’ble
the Chief Justice of India.
4.That the defective portion of prayer (b) has
been prayed on the ground of main body of the
petition and under the circumstances of filing
withdrawal application in a situation when
Registrar did not pay any heed to the
petitioner’s protest email letter dated
25.01.2017.
5.That the removal of prayer (b) would have been
possible by the petitioner if the Registrar would
have listed the defective matter before
25.01.2017
6.That at this stage, the petitioner has moved an
application for criminal appeal by way of motion
against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in Om
Prakash & ANR VS. The Registrar Supreme Court of
India & ANR on 20.02.2017 under Order XV Rule 5
of Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and the petitioner

3. is expecting genuine NOTICE against his appeal by
way of motion.
7.That at this stage, the Notification of defects
reflects that the Registrar is reluctant to list
the defective matter before Hon’ble Judges in
Chamber forcibly and is not willing to withdraw
it from Registrar’s end.
8.That under the above noted circumstances, a
portion of prayer (b), which reads as “……and
issue a NOTICE for appearance against D.NO. 16166
of 2017 and D.NO. 17593 OF 2017 for urgent
relief”, is maintainable.
9. That aggrieved by the forcible registration,
forcible NOTICE of hearing, forcible removal of
Prayer (b) and forcible listing of Curative
(Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 before Hon’ble Judges
in Chambers; the petitioner has filed an online
RTI request against Registrar Misc. vide
JUSTC/R/2017/50376 dated 23.03.2017(Copy
enclosed)and sought five information from the
Registrar Misc. regarding the legal rights of
petitioner.
10. That the prayer (c), “Pass such other
order/orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem just
and proper in the facts and circumstances of the
case” overshadows all other prayers.

4. Accordingly, prayed for withdrawal from
Registrar’s end and prayed for stopping it from
listing before Hon’ble Judges in Chambers on
27.03.2017 and prayed for issuance of a genuine
NOTICE for appearance against D.NO. 16166 of
2017 and D.NO. 17593 OF 2017 for urgent relief.
Petitioner-In-Person
Om Prakash
(Widow Asha Rani Devi)
On behalf of Petitioner No.02
S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar, Part-2. Palam Colony
New Delh-110077
Mob:9968337815
E-mail:om.poddar@gmail.com
ENCLOSURES:
1.As above
2.True Copy of Online RTI vide
JUSTC/R/2017/50376 dated 23.03.2017
With Best Regards,
Om Prakash Poddar
9968337815
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Section X, Supreme Court of India <sec.x@sci.nic.in> wrote:
D.NO. 5356/2016/X

5. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NEW DELHI.
MARCH 23, 2017
FROM : ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(JUDL.)
TO : MR. OM PRAKASH, PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
S/O LATE SH. DEEP NARAYAN PODDAR,
R/O RZF – 893, NETAJI SUBHASH MARG,
RAJ NAGAR PART-2,
PALAM COLONY,
NEW DELHI – 110 077.
CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. … OF 2017 (Diary No.19917/2017)
(APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CURATIVE PETITION)
IN
CURATIVE PETITION D.NO. 41026/2016
IN
REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO. 825/2016
IN
WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 136 OF 2016
(UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)
OM PRAKASH & ANR. ....PETITIONERS

6. -VERSUS-
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ....RESPONDENTS
Sir,
With reference to the application filed by you in
the curative petition above-mentioned, I am directed to inform you
that the same is defectiveas a portion of prayer (b), which reads as
under, is not maintainable and is to be removed from the
application:
“...and issue a NOTICE for appearance against D.NO. 16166 of 2017
and D.NO. 17593 of 2017 for urgent relief.”
You are, therefore, required to cure the aforesaid
defect forthwith, so that the application may be processed further.
Yours faithfully
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(JUDL.)
2 attachments
Reply to Notification of defects dated _23_03_2017.pdf
97K
FINAL STATUS OF RTI DATED 23.03.2017 AGAINST SC.pdf
122K