Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

What increases (social) media attention: Research impact, author prominence or title attractiveness?

128 views

Published on

Zagovora Olga; presentation at 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018) in Leiden, the Netherlands.

Published in: Science
  • Boost your brainpower with brain pill! find out more... ➤➤ https://bit.ly/2GEWG9T
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

What increases (social) media attention: Research impact, author prominence or title attractiveness?

  1. 1. What increases (social) media attention: Research impact, author prominence or title attractiveness? Olga Zagovora Olga Zagovora, Katrin Weller, Milan Janosov, Claudia Wagner and Isabella Peters 1
  2. 2. Factors affecting Number of citations  “Paper related factors’’  quality of paper  novelty and interest of subject  characteristics of fields and study topics  methodology  document type  study design  characteristics of results and discussion  use of figures and appendix  characteristics of the titles and abstracts  characteristics of references  length of paper  age of paper  early citation and speed of citation  accessibility and visibility of papers  ‘‘Journal related factors’’  journal impact factor  language of journal  scope of journal  form of publication  ‘‘Author(s) related factors’’  number of authors  author’s reputation  author’s academic rank,  author’s productivity  international and national collaboration of authors  authors’ country, gender, age and race  organizational features and funding  self-citations (Social) media mentions  Number of citations  ...  title length (Zahedi & Haustein, 2018)  title amusement level (Subotik & Mukherjee, 2014)  Media popularity of topic 2
  3. 3. What matters for (social) media attention?  # citations  Discipline  Publication year  Affiliation  @rank  Country  @GDP on edu  Collaboration net  @PageRank  Length  # char, # words, #:  Sentiment  Polarity  Subjectivity 3 Research impact Author prominence Title attractiveness
  4. 4. Research Questions  Which features of publications are associated with increased (social) media attention?  RQ1: What are the most effective factors?  RQ2: Which discipline-specific differences exist between those features?  RQ3: Are the same types of publications popular across different media channels? (Social) media attention: Wikipedia, Facebook, News, Twitter; Altmetric score [see also Altmetric.com] 4
  5. 5. 5
  6. 6. Datasets Publications  Multidisciplinary journal; control for disciplines  High impact journals; comparable papers in terms of quality Selected Journals:  PNAS 2004-2017  Nature Communications (NC) 2010-2017 Additional data  Web of Science (as of 07.12.2017)  DOI, Publication year, Title, Full author names, Citation counts  PNAS website  Field of Science  Springer Nature SciGraph Data Explorer  Field of Science  Altmetric.com (till 07.12.2017)  Altmetric score  Wikipedia  Twitter  Facebook  News 6 Discipline (OECD) PNAS NC Agricultural sciences 221 62 Engineering & Technology 1 133 2 482 (Humanities) (0) (35) Medical & Health sciences 12 813 2 649 Natural sciences 27 994 10 410 Social sciences 1 810 245 Total 43 921 15 883
  7. 7. Modified variables  Citation counts normalization by year & discipline  Log transformation by Thelwall (2017); MNLCS  ln(1+𝑥 𝑖) 1 𝑛 𝑗=1 𝑛 ln(1+𝑥 𝑗) , where 𝑥𝑖- citation count and 𝑥𝑗 is from the same discipline and year as 𝑥𝑖.  Altmetric score normalization by year & discipline  Normalized Log-transformed Altmetric Score (NLAS) 7
  8. 8. Regression models Dependent var.  Media attention metrics:  Altmetric score, log- transformed normed (NLAS)  # Wikipedia articles  # News stories  # tweets  # Facebook posts Independent var.  Research impact  Citations counts, log- transformed normed (MNLCS)  Year of publication  Author prominence  First author PageRank  Last author PageRank  Title attractiveness  Length  Title chunks “:”  Sentiment:  Polarity  Subjectivity 8
  9. 9. Research impact MNLCS  Higher impact papers 1. 2. 3. 4. Recency 9
  10. 10. Click to add Title – but what?? 10 What matters? Nature Communication PNAS Short titles all all „:“ Wikipedia Altmetric score (e.g., Natural sciences) 1.Twitter 2. News 3. Facebook Positive sentiment Altmetric score (e.g., Natural sciences) 1. Twitter 2. News - Objective Altmetric score Altmetric score (e.g., Natural sciences) 1. Twitter 2. News 3. Facebook
  11. 11. Co-authorship network and PageRank 11 10 papers in PNAS 14 coauthors 1 paper in PNAS 4 coauthors 1 paper in PNAS 0 coauthors Olya JohnProf. Frink High page rank Low page rank Lowest page rank
  12. 12. First author 12 10 papers in PNAS 14 coauthors 1 paper in PNAS 4 coauthors 1 paper in PNAS 0 coauthors Olya JohnProf. Frink High page rank Low page rank Lowest page rank No significant relations BUT :  PNAS Medical & Health Sciences
  13. 13. Last author 13 11 papers in PNAS 15 coauthors 2 papers in PNAS 5 coauthors 1 paper in PNAS 4 coauthors Olya JohnProf. Frink High page rank Low page rank Lowest page rank
  14. 14. Last author 14 11 papers in PNAS 15 coauthors 2 papers in PNAS 5 coauthors 1 paper in PNAS 4 coauthors Olya JohnProf. Frink High page rank Low page rank Lowest page rank PNAS Journal:  Altmetric score  overall  in Social, Medical & Health sciences  News  Twitter  Facebook Nature Communications:  Facebook
  15. 15. Summary  Features associated with increased (social) media attention:  Articles with shorter titles are more likely to appear in media  Polarity of title matters for  Twitter attention to NC papers – Positive  New collaborations attract media attention  News, Twitter, Facebook  Journals inconsistencies  What’s next?  Supplement feature list with  Authors' academic age and productivity level  Google trends of topics  Effect size comparison  Causality
  16. 16. Thank you! Olga Zagovora 17

×