Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

OSFair2017 Workshop | The path-dependence of academic value creation: impact, infrastructure, and innovation in academic publishing

127 views

Published on

Benedikt Fecher talks about the path-dependence of academic value creation | OSFair2017 Workshop

Workshop title: Open Access Models & Platforms

Workshop overview:
What are the emerging models of Open Access for publications? Who should be involved? How are costs distributed over the stakeholders involved? How can OA platforms innovate further to embrace Open Science? This workshop will discuss and showcase the range of models available, including their costs and organisational aspects, to discuss their relative strengths and weaknesses in different academic contexts.

When: DAY 1 - PARALLEL SESSION 1 & 2

Published in: Science
  • I have always found it hard to meet the requirements of being a student. Ever since my years of high school, I really have no idea what professors are looking for to give good grades. After some google searching, I found this service ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐ who helped me write my research paper. The final result was amazing, and I highly recommend ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐ to anyone in the same mindset as me.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

OSFair2017 Workshop | The path-dependence of academic value creation: impact, infrastructure, and innovation in academic publishing

  1. 1. THE PATH-DEPENDENCE OF ACADEMIC VALUE CREATION Impact, infrastructure, and innovation in academic publishing Open Science Fair Athens | Sept 6 | 2017 BENEDIKT FECHER
  2. 2. I) WHY INEFFICIENT SYSTEM PREVAIL
  3. 3. 3 Source: Fine Art America (Public Domain)
  4. 4. 4 Source: EELKE (Flickr, CC-BY)
  5. 5. 5 Source: Museum of History & Industry Photograph Collection
  6. 6. 6 Source: Jason Auch (Flickr, CC-BY)
  7. 7. II) THE PATH-DEPENDENCE OF ACADEMIC PUBLISHING
  8. 8. 8 Source: GaHetNa (Nationaal Archief NL)
  9. 9. 9 Source: Kiril Krastev (CC-SA)
  10. 10. 10 Source: Source: Roche et al. (2014)
  11. 11. 11 Source: Open Science Federation (CC-BY)
  12. 12. 12 Source: Larivière et al., 2015 Percentage of papers published by the five major publishers, by discipline in the Natural and Medical Sciences, 1973–2013.
  13. 13. III) ARE WE REPRODUCING AN INEFFICIENT SYSTEM?
  14. 14. 14 Source: Vogel & Kupferschmidt, 2017
  15. 15. 15 Source: EELKE (Flickr, CC-BY)
  16. 16. 16 Thank you very much for your attention! Contact fecher@hiig.de elephantinthelab.org Literature ● Larivière, V., Haustein, S., and Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE 10, e0127502. ● Vogel, G. (2017). A bold open-access push in Germany could change the future of academic publishing. Science.
  17. 17. 17

×