Plastic pollution in the oceans is a global environmental problem without easy solutions. While plastics are useful materials, 60 years of production and behaviors that encourage throwing plastics away have led to their accumulation in the environment. Potential solutions include redirecting plastic waste from entering the oceans, blocking drainage holes that allow plastic to flow into waterways, and cleaning up existing plastic pollution. However, the drivers of plastic use and different proposed solutions like bioplastics may have conflicting impacts on both resource use and waste generation. Guidance is needed on standards for biodegradable plastics and ensuring solutions follow an appropriate hierarchy of reuse, recycling and compostability over alternatives like bioplastics that do not necessarily reduce litter or waste in the environment
16. Source: Thompson & Napper
Solution: design products for life and end-of-life
EPR to minimise accumulation of plastic waste
17. Potentially conflicting drivers
Can bioplastics reduce litter / waste?
Resource IN Waste OUT
‘This new packaging is fully recyclable, and is said to
reduce carbon emissions by as much as 25% over the
product lifecycle.’
18. Can biodegradables reduce litter impacts?
Resource IN Waste OUT
‘ (EN 13432, ASTM D6400-99) = pre shredded plastic degrades in commercial
composting plant in 180 days, 56 – 71 ºC, 50-60% humidity, aerobic, pH 7-8
Potentially conflicting drivers
19. Jambeck et al. 2015
Plastic debris
cumulative
Oceans
could contain
250 million tonnes
by 2025
20.
21. 1) Guidance on standards / relevance in this context (e.g. biodegradability
standards)
(EN 13432, ASTM D6400-99) = pre shredded plastic degrades in commercial
composting plant in 180 days, 56 – 71 ºC, 50-60% humidity, aerobic, pH
2) Guidance on the appropriate hierarchy of measures (they are not all
equivalents)
‘’Ensure plastic packaging is designed to be reusable, recyclable or compostable’’
‘’Pledge of 70% recycling by 2025’’ …..where does bioplastic fit?
Potential contributions from OECD
22. Richard Thompson - Thank you
https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/research/marine-litter
Editor's Notes
From space still a blue planet
But on closer inspection
Sea surface and shorelines heavily contaminated with marine litter, mostly plastic, even in the remotest parts of the plant
20 km offshore Marseille/Mediterranean , canyon of Panier , Depth 1000 m, Picture from submersible CYANA
In some areas of the deep sea more plastic than in the widely p reported pacific garbage patch
Some items so large they can be seen form space but the most numerous items are the microplastics
Some just microns in size and likely that smaller nano plastic debris is also present.
Clear evidence of economic cost just to keep key areas like tourist beaches, ports and harbours clean
UK municipalities spend approximately €18 million each year removing beach litter; a 37%
increase in cost over the past 10 years. Similarly, removing beach litter costs municipalities in the
Netherlands and Belgium approximately €10.4 million per year. One of the major economic issues
driving the need for clean-up operations is the aesthetic impact on tourist beaches
Can lead to loss of life
Over 700 species encounter marine litter, many encounters harmful , some fatal
Over 90% of encounters are with plastic litter
10% of reports by species are encounters re with microplastics including ingestion by commercially important species of fish and shellfish
But litter in the sea is a symptom of the problem and plastics as materails are not the problem
Many benefits
Different to many other challenges discussed at this meeting
In most cases environmental challenge is directly like to the benefit wanted by society
Fish to eat + less fish in the sea
Tourist development of land = les natural habitat
Not so for plastics the problems and the benefits are NOT directly coupled
Its possible to have the benefit without the problem
Exponential increase in production
M 40% is production of disposable / single use items
So why are we in this mess? Single use items rapidly accumulate as waste and are dominant in marine litter
How to solve
Clean up - not effective and we would have to do it for ever
Block the points of entry – they are many and varied
Best option to divert flow of waste away form sea
Synergy with waste management on land
Plastic, and single use plastic main item of waste. Some is escaping to the environment as litter
If we can better capture in recycling this reduces waste generation, reduces potential to escape as litter and reduces reliance on fossil oil/ gas reserves as carbon source
Challenges to have design for life and end of life
Microbeads in cosmetics - not needed?
Release of fibre I form textiles can be altered significantly by textile choice
Design of bottles to facilitate actual recovery in recycling
Carbon sustainability versus waste
Nothing to do with waste in sea or on land – not about biodegradable
Circular economy visa recycling also sustainable
Not biodegradable
Labelling and product design
Compatibility
If we do nothing litter in the sea set to increase dramatically
This is where some consumers see the future
But this denies us the benefits of plastic
There is a better future with a plastic - reduces food waste but EPR urgently needed
More in formation and papers free to download on our web site