Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Challenges and co-ordination of leniency programmes – ACCC AND NEW ZEALAND COMMERCE COMMISSION – June 2018 OECD discussion


Published on

This presentation Jill WALKER, Commissioner, New Zealand Commerce Commission, was made during the discussion “Challenges and co-ordination of leniency programmes” held at the 127th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 5 June 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Challenges and co-ordination of leniency programmes – ACCC AND NEW ZEALAND COMMERCE COMMISSION – June 2018 OECD discussion

  1. 1. OECD Competition Committee WP3 5 June 2018 Jill Walker, Commissioner, New Zealand Commerce Commission Marcus Bezzi, Executive General Manager, ACCC Trans–Tasman Leniency Cooperation
  2. 2. Trans-Tasman Cooperation 2 Statutory Framework Formal cooperation Informal cooperation Immunity & leniency policies • Commerce Act 1986 based on the Trade Practices Act 1974 • 1988 MOU on Harmonisation of Business Law and ss.36A & 46A • Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 • Single Economic Market Outcomes Framework 2009 • Cross appointments between agencies • MOU between agencies • Information Gateway provisions CER & inter- government agreements
  3. 3. • Cartel provisions (civil versus criminal) • Immunity and cooperation policies (consultation on policy reviews) • Capacity to share confidential information and use compulsory powers in limited circumstances: • S.99I Commerce Act 1986 (NZ)/s.155AAA Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Aus) • ss.155A&B Competition and Consumer Act 2010/ ss. 98H&99A Commerce Act 1986 (in relation to ss.36A & 46A) Framework for Leniency Cooperation 3
  4. 4. From marker to outcome of investigation: • Coordinating information requests • Coordinating investigation strategies/focus • Coordinating case theories • Coordinating interviews of overseas personnel • Coordinating approach to outcomes • Sharing experience of problems dealing with applicants (e.g. non- cooperation) In Practice - Global and Trans-Tasman Cooperation 4  Largely not rely on statutory powers  Information gateways – providing assistance can bring forth immunity applications
  5. 5. For us: • Prioritisation of resources • More focused investigations on international conduct • Able to get up to speed on issues quicker • Ensuring we have not missed anything critical in our investigation approach and how we are assessing the matter. What are the benefits? 5
  6. 6. For the applicants: • Applicants are able to satisfy the information needs of both ACCC and NZCC in a systematic way • Parties are able to search for material in databases in a coordinated approach • Less disruption to their businesses – key staff are interviewed by both regulators in a coordinated manner What are the benefits? 6