Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections
&
Ellen Collins, Research Officer, Research
Information Network
@oapenuk ...
@oapenuk #oapenuk
58 HSS titles: 2006 - 2011
Experimental Group
(29 titles)
Control Group
(29 titles)
OA with CC licence
O...
The research programme
1.How policies, processes and mechanisms need
to change in order to enable OA publication of
monogr...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/stewart/461099066/
OAPEN-UK Research Plan
Ellen Collins, Research Information Network
Researc...
Focus groups
@oapenuk #oapenuk
1. Institutional
representatives
including
librarians, institution
al repository
staff, res...
Focus Groups: Key themes
Metadata: What is the metadata
required to support
discovery, purchase, libraries, researc
h fund...
Focus Groups: Key themes
Copyright: ownership, licensing
and rights associated with
images
Benefits of OA: how to
articula...
Focus Groups: Key themes
Ways to make OA profitable:
how can publishers / ebook
aggregators add value to
content? Overlay ...
The HSS researcher survey
About the respondents
23.0
21.6
27.1
23.0
5.2
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Before 1959 1960s 1970s 1980s and onwards M...
About the respondents
26.5
10.3
18.1
14.6
20.3
5.7
4.2
0.3
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
PhD Post-doc Assistant
profess...
About the respondents
82.3
7.7
4.3 4.8
0.9
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
UK Rest of Europe North Americ...
Open access awareness
7.2
53.8
38.7
0.3
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
Never heard Aware Familiar Missing
Percentage
Aw...
Open access awareness
15.3
5.6
3.2 3.0
4.3
10.3
54.6
62.0
52.0
54.5
52.9
38.5
30.1
32.4
44.8
42.6 42.1
51.3
0.0
10.0
20.0
...
Open access awareness
8.6
6.5
58.2
51.4
32.8
42.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Social sciences Humanities
Percen...
Profits from publishing
3.5
20.0
52.5
19.0
4.33.6
20.1
51.3
20.6
3.2
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
No, not even if it ...
Profits from publishing
4.4
9.9
1.6
3.0
0.7
2.6
24.0
29.6
18.4
20.8
15.0
10.3
57.4
32.4
54.4
49.5
53.6 53.8
10.9
21.1
23.2...
Creative Commons
58.1
38.3
3.6
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Yes No Missing
Percentage
Aware of Creative Commons ...
Creative Commons
6.0
25.0
42.1 42.8
50.1
2.7
1.7
29.5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
Yes No
Percentage
Aware of Creativ...
Creative Commons
19.1
22.3
57.1
23.5
43.0
78.8
63.5
57.7
25.5
54.1
37.0
6.5
12.2
13.9
11.0
15.7
13.3
8.7
0.0
10.0
20.0
30....
Creative Commons
22.7
27.9
58.1
29.4
55.6
84.8
15.5 15.9
61.0
16.7
28.0
76.9
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
9...
Conclusions
• Considerable potential for OAPEN-UK-style open
access model
• Focus groups positive
• Survey indicates poten...
Thank you & Further Info
OAPEN-UK website:
http://oapen-
uk.jiscebooks.org/
Twitter:
@oapenuk
Diigo Group:
OAPEN-UK
Caren ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

OAPEN-UK Presentation at Liber Conference, Tartu, Estonia, 2012

361 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

OAPEN-UK Presentation at Liber Conference, Tartu, Estonia, 2012

  1. 1. Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections & Ellen Collins, Research Officer, Research Information Network @oapenuk #oapenuk
  2. 2. @oapenuk #oapenuk 58 HSS titles: 2006 - 2011 Experimental Group (29 titles) Control Group (29 titles) OA with CC licence OAPEN Library Publishers website Institutional Repository Google Books (100%) Standard e-book agreements Publishers website E-book aggregators Google Books (10%) Print version available for sale E-book device friendly version available for sale
  3. 3. The research programme 1.How policies, processes and mechanisms need to change in order to enable OA publication of monographs? 2.What are the measurable effects of a move to OA monographs? 3.How do perceptions of OA monograph publication change among participants during the project? @oapenuk #oapenuk
  4. 4. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stewart/461099066/ OAPEN-UK Research Plan Ellen Collins, Research Information Network Research process Initiation Year 1 end Year 2 end Project end
  5. 5. Focus groups @oapenuk #oapenuk 1. Institutional representatives including librarians, institution al repository staff, research managers 2. Publishers 3. Learned Societies 4. Researchers (as both authors & readers) 5. E-book aggregators 6. Research Funders
  6. 6. Focus Groups: Key themes Metadata: What is the metadata required to support discovery, purchase, libraries, researc h funders? Versioning, preservation & archiving: What is the version of record, how is it preserved (centrally?) and who provides archival access? Usage: data collection methods and standards to support comparability of data Methods of delivery: where should OA monographs sit, in what formats, with what functionality and using what standards? Quality & prestige: impact of perceptions on adoption of a OA model and need to maintain excellence What do authors want: readership, research dissemination, academic prestige and reward including the REF
  7. 7. Focus Groups: Key themes Copyright: ownership, licensing and rights associated with images Benefits of OA: how to articulate opportunities; access and costs savings? International issues: not just UK market, need to account for territories, translation etc. Changing roles: who does what in an OA model, what are the roles for publishers, librarians etc., which to keep, which to start and which to discontinue? Impact on processes: policies, mandates, funding routes, payment and behaviour Consistency: should licensing, standards, peer review be standardised? Does one size fit all?
  8. 8. Focus Groups: Key themes Ways to make OA profitable: how can publishers / ebook aggregators add value to content? Overlay services Risk: how will the financial, reputational and quality risks be overcome? Funding: who pays and how? Calculating costs: what is the cost of an OA monograph and is it the same for all publishers, subjects?
  9. 9. The HSS researcher survey
  10. 10. About the respondents 23.0 21.6 27.1 23.0 5.2 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 Before 1959 1960s 1970s 1980s and onwards Missing Percentage Decade Birth decade of survey respondents
  11. 11. About the respondents 26.5 10.3 18.1 14.6 20.3 5.7 4.2 0.3 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 PhD Post-doc Assistant professor Associate professor Professor Researchers outside academia Other Missing Percentage Career stage Career stage of survey respondents
  12. 12. About the respondents 82.3 7.7 4.3 4.8 0.9 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 UK Rest of Europe North America Rest of world Missing Percentage Region Region of residence of survey respondents 38.8 60.0 1.2 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 Social sciences Humanities Missing Percentage Discipline Discipline of survey respondents
  13. 13. Open access awareness 7.2 53.8 38.7 0.3 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 Never heard Aware Familiar Missing Percentage Awareness of open access Awareness of open access
  14. 14. Open access awareness 15.3 5.6 3.2 3.0 4.3 10.3 54.6 62.0 52.0 54.5 52.9 38.5 30.1 32.4 44.8 42.6 42.1 51.3 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 PhD Post-doc Assistant professor Associate professor Professor Researchers outside academia Percentage Career stage Awareness of open access by career stage Never heard Aware Familiar
  15. 15. Open access awareness 8.6 6.5 58.2 51.4 32.8 42.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 Social sciences Humanities Percentage Discipline Awareness of open access by discipline Never heard Aware Familiar
  16. 16. Profits from publishing 3.5 20.0 52.5 19.0 4.33.6 20.1 51.3 20.6 3.2 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 No, not even if it is needed to cover publishing costs Yes, but only to cover publishing costs Yes, and it is acceptable to make a profit if that profit goes back into supporting the discipline (and, for OA question, making more open access content available) Yes, and it is acceptable to make a profit however you choose to spend it Don't know Percentage Acceptability of publishing profit Acceptability of publishing profit Open access All publishing
  17. 17. Profits from publishing 4.4 9.9 1.6 3.0 0.7 2.6 24.0 29.6 18.4 20.8 15.0 10.3 57.4 32.4 54.4 49.5 53.6 53.8 10.9 21.1 23.2 21.8 27.9 28.2 3.3 7.0 2.4 4.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 PhD Post-doc Assistant professor Associate professor Professor Researchers outside academia Percentage Career stage Acceptability of publishing profit by career stage No, not even if it is needed to cover publishing costs Yes, but only to cover publishing costs Yes, and it is acceptable to make a profit if that profit goes back into supporting the discipline (and, for OA question, making more open access content available) Yes, and it is acceptable to make a profit however you choose to spend it Don't know
  18. 18. Creative Commons 58.1 38.3 3.6 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 Yes No Missing Percentage Aware of Creative Commons licences? Creative Commons awareness
  19. 19. Creative Commons 6.0 25.0 42.1 42.8 50.1 2.7 1.7 29.5 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 Yes No Percentage Aware of Creative Commons licences? Willingess to publish with CC licence against CC awareness No, I don't know enough about it Maybe, I would need to look into it Yes, I would feel confident about doing this Don't know
  20. 20. Creative Commons 19.1 22.3 57.1 23.5 43.0 78.8 63.5 57.7 25.5 54.1 37.0 6.5 12.2 13.9 11.0 15.7 13.3 8.7 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 CC BY CC BY SA CC BY ND CC BY NC CC BY NC SA CC BY NC ND Percentage CCl licence CC licences considered by researchers Yes No Don't know
  21. 21. Creative Commons 22.7 27.9 58.1 29.4 55.6 84.8 15.5 15.9 61.0 16.7 28.0 76.9 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 CC_BY CC_BY-SA CC_BY_ND CC_BY-NC CC_BY-NC-SA CC BY-NC-ND Percentage CC licence Researchers who are willing to consider use of CC licences by their awareness of CC Aware Not aware
  22. 22. Conclusions • Considerable potential for OAPEN-UK-style open access model • Focus groups positive • Survey indicates potential • But still many barriers still to overcome • Technical and procedural issues • Attitudinal issues • Lack of clarity and policy • Quality and trust
  23. 23. Thank you & Further Info OAPEN-UK website: http://oapen- uk.jiscebooks.org/ Twitter: @oapenuk Diigo Group: OAPEN-UK Caren Milloy c.milloy@jisc- collections.ac.uk Ellen Collins ellen.collins@researchinfo net.org @oapenuk #oapenuk

×