รูปทรงกลม

•

0 likes•108 views

Sarun Chaikaew

Education

Viewers also liked

öZlem özkiliç makale - en

Özlem ÖZKILIÇ

6th math c2 -inv5--feb7

jdurst65

6th math c1 -l33--dec11

jdurst65

background check

xilvar

6th math c1 -l35--dec18

jdurst65

Bridging work

tori98

8th pre alg - L3--aug23

jdurst65

7th pre alg -L13--sept14

jdurst65

039 Chemnitzer Pilotprojekt für Gehörlose auf Jobsuche.pdf

unn | UNITED NEWS NETWORK GmbH

Deutsche Bank Charity Work

ytwersky

งานนำเสนอไม่มีชื่อ

Supaporn Kanthachan

Internet Governance in Transition_ The ITU as a Battleground for Rival Visions

Carl Frank

Gender, policy, and the public workspace

taratoot

Can a scientist with tools of his science distinguish between chance and purpose (design)? In order to solve this question a Gedanken experiment originally conceived by John Bell is considered. In this experiment coins are tossed and the results - head or tail - are displayed as set of characters in an array. Suppose now a magic power turning certain coins once more. Again a random pattern appears. Only by superposing both random patterns, a letter combination EPR appears. Apparently there is purpose in the appearance of EPR, as the magic power is selecting certain coins to be turned once more. The scientist, however, who is looking at the two patterns will not recognize any structure beyond randomness and will describe the appearance of EPR as a pure matter of chance. There is no physical or scientific equipment to measure purpose. Only a philosophical analysis is able to decide whether there is something real beside the physical level. The result of this analysis yields two alternatives for a non-deterministic world: either there is only chance, or there is also purpose. Both are metaphysical statements. For illustration a few statements of philosophers (Gilson, Thomas Aquinas) as well as scientists (Hawking, de Broglie, Einstein, Nienhuis) are given. In the last part of the talk the role of the final cause, as already introduced by Aristotle, is emphasized. It appears that by restricting reality to pure physical or biological systems, one excludes final aspects of causality. In that case, evolution of the universe and also of life is necessarily blind and directed by chance. With such an approach complexity, order and beauty in nature become inherently irrational and incomprehensible. This presentation has originally been given at the 2007 seminar of the Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies held at Netherhall, London on 2-1-2007. The general topic of this seminar was: Does God play dice? Evolution, Randomness and Intelligence in Nature

Chance and purpose: Can a scientist with tools of his science distinguish bet...

Alfred Driessen

Colorimetria treinamento comercial março2010

Bogarim.net

Tricologia

Marciomimoto

Documento de apoyo de colorimetria

proyectosdecorazon

A estrutura do cabelo apostila colorimetria

Joaquim Wilmar

Viewers also liked (18)

öZlem özkiliç makale - en

6th math c2 -inv5--feb7

6th math c1 -l33--dec11

background check

6th math c1 -l35--dec18

Bridging work

8th pre alg - L3--aug23

7th pre alg -L13--sept14

039 Chemnitzer Pilotprojekt für Gehörlose auf Jobsuche.pdf

Deutsche Bank Charity Work

งานนำเสนอไม่มีชื่อ

Internet Governance in Transition_ The ITU as a Battleground for Rival Visions

Gender, policy, and the public workspace

Chance and purpose: Can a scientist with tools of his science distinguish bet...

Colorimetria treinamento comercial março2010

Tricologia

Documento de apoyo de colorimetria

A estrutura do cabelo apostila colorimetria

รูปทรงกลม

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (18)