Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Selection Hearing Community Case V4 0

504 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Selection Hearing Community Case V4 0

  1. 1. C88 Recommendation <ul><li>Include Community (and their Intergeneration) Requirements </li></ul><ul><li>Exercise & Recreation Amenities </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>1 football/cricket size oval </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>4 basketball/tennis courts </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>4 BBQ units & 1-2 Pavilion facilities </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment ecosystem development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Wetland ecosystem development in the SW in Monash University land </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Pedestrian/Bicycle Tracks Amenity </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Optimise the Council solution for future generations living in a increasingly denser Notting Hill by: </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Combining Council options SE1 & SW2 </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Increase easement of way of 20m instead of 3 m </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>To make specific resolution of community concerns of lacking open space amenities in the estate since 2004 Amenity concerns for neighbouring residents & in particular interface issues will be important considerations Page 5, Monash Planning Scheme Amendment C88 Explanatory Report
  2. 2. Background <ul><li>Community lost their open space amenities when: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Primary School closed in 2004 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Secondary School closed in 2006 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Lost Amenities: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>4 Tennis Courts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3 Basket ball Courts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2 Large Ovals – Cricket & Football s </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1 Med Oval </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1 Fully fitted Children Playground </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Indoor recreation facilities e.g. performing theatre, arts rooms, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>32 Risdon Drive Public Access </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Primary School oval, playground, building amenities </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Current Open Space Inventory shows poor service provisioning </li></ul><ul><ul><li>What happened to monies traded for open space from previous & current large scale developments? </li></ul></ul>Bicycle Track Playground Green space – Council
  3. 3. Notting Hill – Our Community , Our People <ul><li>The lives of real people are being affected by C88 Amendment </li></ul>
  4. 4. Why Include Community Requirements in C88 <ul><li>What we asked is smaller than what we lost …… </li></ul><ul><li>When the 2 schools were closed, the community also lost: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>4 Tennis Courts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3 Basket ball Courts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>2 Large Ovals – Cricket & Football s </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1 Med Oval </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1 Fully fitted Children Playground </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Indoor recreation facilities e.g. performing theatre, arts rooms, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>32 Risdon Drive Public Access </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Primary School oval, playground, building amenities </li></ul></ul>Amenities Lost Amenities Asked <ul><li>DEECD/Council Solution Offer </li></ul><ul><li>~4,000 sqm area </li></ul><ul><li>Short bicycle tracks </li></ul><ul><li>Minimized community consultation </li></ul><ul><li>No public disclose of amenity design scenarios </li></ul><ul><li>Socio-economic & government centric solution that lacks socio-environment servicing for the local community and their inter-generations  weak ESD principle: </li></ul><ul><li>Providing for equity </li></ul><ul><li>within and between generations </li></ul><ul><li>Community Solution </li></ul><ul><li>Functional amenity requirements determine open space size </li></ul><ul><li>Intergeneration solution for </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Community development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Community resilience building </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Enables environment ecosystem development </li></ul><ul><li>Gives a more balance social, economic & environment solution for all stakeholders </li></ul><ul><li>Exercise & Recreation Amenities </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1 football/cricket oval </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>4 basketball/tennis courts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>4 BBQ units & 1-2 Pavilions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Longer pedestrian/bicycle tracks with 6m easements </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Local Ecosystem Development </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Wetland in SW in Monash University Land </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Why Include Community Requirements in C88 <ul><li>2. Threatening Our Intergeneration Sustainability </li></ul>In 2006, the local population in Notting Hill grew about 22% to about 1,661 people & the actual situation shows no signs of slowing down with increasing high density infill. <ul><li>Fast Changing Demographics </li></ul><ul><li>CALD population </li></ul><ul><li> Aged  CALD Eld ers </li></ul><ul><li>Young Families </li></ul><ul><li>Youths </li></ul>
  6. 6. Why Include Community Requirements in C88 <ul><li>There is no community & intergeneration equity in the DEECD/Council Solution </li></ul><ul><li>Current C88 Amendment makes no provision for corporate social responsibility </li></ul>Short Bicycle Track Narrow way of path Size: ~4,000 sqm No public design scenarios Social Economic Environment Economic Socio Environment Socio <ul><li>Intergeneration health & well-being </li></ul><ul><li>Local ecosystems development </li></ul><ul><li>Local community development continuity </li></ul><ul><li>Local community resilience building capacity </li></ul>Notting Hill Community DEECD Council $ales Proceed Socio Economic Sustainability <ul><li>Future rate$ income </li></ul><ul><li>M2030 – specialist activity centre dev evidence </li></ul>Socio Environ. Sustainability Open Space Negotiation The Decision Criteria Divide
  7. 7. Why Include Community Requirements in C88 <ul><li>4. The community feels “cheated” by their own governments </li></ul>Short Bicycle Track Narrow way of path Size: ~4,000 sqm No public design scenarios $hort Change? Notting Hill Community DEECD Council $ales Proceed Socio Economic Sustainability Socio Environ. Sustainability Open Space Negotiation The Decision Criteria Divide
  8. 8. <ul><li>Decisions/Practice & Policies Don’t Match </li></ul>Why Include Community Requirements in C88 Economic Socio Environment Socio M2030 Sustainability Principles DPCD Goals Monash Economic Goals This is what is desired This is what is in practice Strong in Socio-economic sustainability Lacking in Socio-environment + Intergeneration sustainability Social Economic Environment Community Development Community Resilience Business Development Economic Sustainability Social Economic Environment Economic Socio Environment Socio
  9. 9. Moving Forward to a Balanced C88 Amendment & Execution <ul><li>Integrate community requirements in C88 for policy reinforcement </li></ul><ul><li>Rethink the use of the Primary School for creating a Community Hub to provide community amenities & services like: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>>= 4 Basketball/Tennis Courts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Community Garden & Kitchen </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Community Project & Learning Spaces </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Community Services: eg </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Community Rehabilitation; </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>After school education & training development </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Youth mentoring </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Local entrepreneur , innovation and employment development </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Playground Facilities, Art gallery, etc </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Engage more effectively with the community in the amenity design scenarios planning of open space and community hub planning </li></ul><ul><li> leverage the Clayton Community Action Planning Project’s </li></ul><ul><li>implementation to support this recommendation </li></ul><ul><li> Effective Community Engagement in </li></ul><ul><li>Notting Hill Urban Planning & Governance </li></ul><ul><li>Evaluate the viability of accommodating Affordable Housing development in the light of the recommended future uses of the 2 schools, as a second alternative to be evaluated for delivering: </li></ul><ul><li>A better and balanced solution / C88 amendment policy that sustains </li></ul><ul><ul><li>M2030 social, economic and environment directions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>DPCD (and national) community resilience building capacity, including growing current Notting Hill community development propensity </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Conclusion <ul><li>Exercise & Recreation Amenities </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>1 football/cricket size oval </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>4 basketball/tennis courts </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>4 BBQ units & 1-2 Pavilion facilities </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment ecosystem development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Wetland ecosystem development in the SW in Monash University land </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Pedestrian/Bicycle Tracks Amenity </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Optimise the Council solution for future generations living in a increasingly denser Notting Hill by: </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Combining Council options SE1 & SW2 </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Increase easement of way of 20m instead of 3 m </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>A Community Hub @ Primary School site </li></ul><ul><li>>= 4 Basketball/Tennis Courts </li></ul><ul><li>Community Garden & Kitchen </li></ul><ul><li>Community Project & Learning Spaces </li></ul><ul><li>Community Services: eg </li></ul><ul><li>Community Rehabilitation; </li></ul><ul><li>After school education & training development </li></ul><ul><li>Youth mentoring </li></ul><ul><li>Local entrepreneur , innovation and employment development </li></ul><ul><li>Playground Facilities, Art gallery, etc </li></ul>Proposal 1 Integrate community open space requirements in C88 Amendment Proposal 2 Execute recommended C88 Amendment with support of reusing the Primary School as a Community Hub that Creates employment + innovation and Builds community and intergeneration resilience
  11. 11. Returning our Notting Hill Liveability & Human Rights via C88 Amendment Wider & Safer Space for Walking, Jogging, Cycling & Enjoying Sports & Community Recreation & Innovation for all Age, CALD & Disability Groups Availing more open public safe space/s for future community crisis / risks management Residents’ Human Rights to Healthy Living & Well Being Gives Residents their Intergeneration Liveability Thank You? X
  12. 12. Proposals’ Locations Appendix – Visual Diagram <ul><li>Community Hub </li></ul><ul><li>Proposal 1 – Integrate the following in C88 Amendment </li></ul><ul><li>Exercise & Recreation Amenities </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>1 football/cricket size oval </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>4 basketball/tennis courts </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>4 BBQ units & 1-2 Pavilion facilities </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment ecosystem development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Wetland ecosystem development in the SW in Monash University land </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Pedestrian/Bicycle Tracks Amenity </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Optimise the Council solution for future generations living in a increasingly denser Notting Hill by: </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Combining Council options SE1 & SW2 </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Increase easement of way of 20m instead of 3 m </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Proposal 2 – Develop a Community Hub @ Primary School site </li></ul><ul><li>>= 4 Basketball/Tennis Courts </li></ul><ul><li>Community Garden & Kitchen </li></ul><ul><li>Community Project & Learning Spaces </li></ul><ul><li>Community Services: eg </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Community Rehabilitation; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>After school education & training development </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Youth mentoring </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Local entrepreneur , innovation and employment development </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Playground Facilities, Art gallery, etc </li></ul>

×