20130813 Nobuko Miyairi @ the 15th Fiesole collection development retreat

672 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
672
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

20130813 Nobuko Miyairi @ the 15th Fiesole collection development retreat

  1. 1. Open Access in Asia David Swinbanks Managing Director, ANZ, Macmillan Science & Education Managing Director, Regional Markets/Science & Medical Communications, NPG Nobuko Miyairi Consultant/Analyst, Asia-Pacific, NPG 15th Fiesole Collection Development Retreat August 13, 2013
  2. 2. 2 OA mandate is still a long way to go in Asia.
  3. 3. 3 OA mandate status 0 50 100 150 200 250 Proposed Sub-Institutional Mandate Proposed Institutional Mandate Multi-Institutional Mandate Proposed Multi-Institutional Mandate Proposed Funder Mandate Sub-Institutional Mandate Funder Mandate Thesis Mandate Institutional Mandate 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 India China Japan Indonesia Asia Sub-Institutional Mandate Proposed Funder Mandate Proposed Multi- Institutional Mandate Thesis Mandate Institutional Mandate Advanced Search ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies http://roarmap.eprints.org/
  4. 4. 4 Publishers in Asia are actively publishing OA journals.
  5. 5. 5
  6. 6. 6 Laakso, M. & Björk, B.-C. Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC medicine 10, 124 (2012).
  7. 7. 7 Laakso, M. & Björk, B.-C. Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC medicine 10, 124 (2012).
  8. 8. 8 Open Access @ NPG
  9. 9. 10 34 1 1 1 1 1 3 9 15 16 2 3 3 15 40 45 47 47 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 OA Hybrid
  10. 10. 1111 14 48 108 90 131 125 216 18 69 116 137 183 267 491 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 # Papers OA non-OA 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 2010 2011 2012 2013 Top 10 countries publishing in Nature Communications, 2010-2013 July USA UK Japan Germany China France Switzerland Canada Netherlands Australia Italy
  11. 11. 1212 26 179 274 518 1030 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 # Papers OA 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 2011 2012 2013 Top 10 countries publishing in Scientific Reports, 2011-2013 July USA China Japan UK Germany Italy France Spain Australia Canada
  12. 12. 13 China is more active than Japan in OA publishing.
  13. 13. 14 Article count (July 2013) Japan China 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Nature Nature Communications Scientific Reports Nature Genetics Nature Materials Nature Physics Nature Cell Biology Nature Neuroscience Nature Medicine Nature Immunology Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Nature Nature Communications Scientific Reports Nature Genetics Nature Materials Nature Cell Biology Nature Physics Nature Nanotechnology Nature Medicine Nature Neuroscience Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  14. 14. 15 Article count with CC>=0.5 (July 2013) Japan China 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Nature Nature Communications Scientific Reports 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Nature Nature Communications Scientific Reports
  15. 15. 16 Article count (2013 extrapolated) Japan China 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Nature Nature Communications Scientific Reports 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Nature Nature Communications Scientific Reports
  16. 16. 17 Authors in China and Japan are more receptive to OA publishing.
  17. 17. 18 Nature Publishing Group surveys authors every year, and in January 2013 asked questions about OA activity and attitudes. NPG received over 23,000 responses to this survey, and respondents were comprised of a mix of authors published in NPG- journals and non-NPG journals alike. Some clear differences emerged between authors based in China and Japan and those based in the US and Europe. Firstly, it was suspected that authors in China and Japan tended to have budget allocated within their grant for publication costs – this did indeed to be more common than in the US and Europe.
  18. 18. 19 Those authors who had published under an OA model were asked why. Authors from China and Japan were much more likely to give ‘publishing’ reasons for choosing OA – believing that an OA paper would receive more citations, be read more widely and be published faster.
  19. 19. 20 Those authors who had not published OA were asked why not. It is apparent that awareness of OA is much greater in the US and Europe, and that concerns about perceptions of quality seemed to be highest in the US.
  20. 20. 2121 • There is stronger support in the scientific community and more funds available for OA in Asia despite lack of government mandates. • This translates to unusually high numbers of OA papers in Nature Communications and Scientific Reports from Japan and in particular China. • Frustrations over lack of visibility of Asian research in the West and a belief that OA will increase visibility may be driving Asian (Japan and China) scientists to publish OA with more determination than their Western colleagues.
  21. 21. 22 thanks

×