NoTube in perspective

619 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

NoTube in perspective

  1. 1. NoTube  in  perspec.ve  Lora  Aroyo  &  Guus  Schreiber   VU  University  Amsterdam  
  2. 2. This  presenta;on  •  Y2  recommenda;ons  •  Some  brief  reflec;ons  •  Agenda    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   2  
  3. 3. Y2  RECOMMENDATIONS    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   3  
  4. 4. Recommenda;ons  1.  Improve  double  screen  experience  in  uses   cases    2.  Focus  more  on  user  experience  for  each  use   case    3.  Develop  web  services  based  on  the  results  of   the  projects    4.  Think  of  a  beTer  exploita;on  of  the  results   aUer  the  end  of  the  project      26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   4  
  5. 5. N-­‐screen  demo    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   5  
  6. 6. Increasing  user  experience    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   6  
  7. 7. iFanzy  showcase    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   7  
  8. 8. Service  orienta;on    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   8  
  9. 9. NoTube  Portal    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   9  
  10. 10. Beancounter  as  a  service    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   10  
  11. 11. NoTube  user  portal    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   11  
  12. 12.  Exploita;on  •  Extensive  exploita;on  ac;vi;es,  both  in  in   open/public  space  and  proprietary   – Extensive  presenta;on  tomorrow  •  Some  exploita;ons  are  somewhat  unexpected       26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   12  
  13. 13. Con;nuous  evalua;on  •  Systema;c,  throughout  the  project,  mul;ple   ;mes    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   13  
  14. 14. Social  TV  survey    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   14  
  15. 15. Social  TV  focus  group    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   15  
  16. 16. REFLECTIONS    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   16  
  17. 17. What  did  we  achieve?  •  Not:  one  big  integrated  system  •  Rather:  rela;vely  small  nuggets  •  But:  those  nuggets  have  a  silver  lining   – Services,  APIs,  TV  data,  contribu;ons  to  standards   •  Deployed,  also  outside  NoTube   – Insighcul  showcases   – Tested  in  several  cycles  •  Dissemina;on:  e.g.  IBC  (twice),  MIPTV    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   17  
  18. 18. Problems  &  mistakes  •  Bridging  the  TV  &  Web  culture   – Proprietary  vs.  open  standards   – Reflected  in  use  cases  •  Need  to  adapt  our  service  approach  •  Adap;ng  to  the  swiUly  changing  reality  of  the   TV  world   – exploita;on      26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   18  
  19. 19. AGENDA    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   19  
  20. 20. Day  1:  technical  workpackages  •  Before  lunch:   – WP6  Architecture   – WP3:  User  profiling  &  recommenda;ons  •  AUer  lunch:   – WP2:  TV  metadata   – WP4:  Enrichment   – WP1:  Models  &  seman;cs  •  WP10:  Management      26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   20  
  21. 21. Day  2  •  Before  lunch   – Showcases  :  demos  of  the  three  use  cases   – Exploita;on   – Dissemina;on  •  AUer  lunch   – Internal  mee;ng  reviewers   – Feedback  session   – 16:00:  end  of  mee;ng    26-­‐27  March  2012   NoTube  3rd  review   21  

×