Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Nfhk2011 matts-åke belin_plenary3

243 views

Published on

Nollvisionen - en systematisk folkhälsopolicy med konkreta resultat? Matts-Åke Belin Swedish Transport Administration

Published in: Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Nfhk2011 matts-åke belin_plenary3

  1. 1. Matts-Åke Belin Swedish Transport Administrationmatts-ake.belin@trafikverket.se Nollvisionen - en systematisk folkhälsopolicy med konkreta resultat?NFHK2011, Finland on 25th of August
  2. 2. Topics for my presentation • Some background- road traffic injuries trends and road safety policy development in Sweden • Vision Zero • Some examples how Vision Zero as a new policy affects our daily road safety business2 2011-12-20
  3. 3. 3 1 000 1 200 1 400 200 400 600 800 02011-12-20 1943 1945 1947 1949 1951 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 Killed in Road traffic in Sweden, 1943 - 2009 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
  4. 4. VISION ZERO • October 1997 the Swedish Parliament passed a new bill on Road Traffic Safety • long-term goal no one should be killed or seriously injured as the result of an accident within the road transport system • the design and functioning of the road transport system must be adapted to the requirements resulting from this ruling.4 2011-12-20
  5. 5. Different policies and strategies Traditional approach Vision Zero approach Accidents Injuries Individual road user behavior The system is not designed according to human capability and human tolerance against external violence – in other words what the human body can stand. Road user has primary System designer has primary responsibility responsibility Change individual road user Change the environment (road behavior environment, vehicles, social environment) Risk reduction Eliminate fatalities and serious injuries5 2011-12-20
  6. 6. 6 2011-12-20
  7. 7. Probability of Pedestrian Fatality by Impact Speed7 2011-12-20
  8. 8. 8 2011-12-20
  9. 9. 9 2011-12-20
  10. 10. Speed limits based on injury related criteria – rural area or10 2011-12-20
  11. 11. Number of km at year end 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20092+1-road 180 450 680 950 1130 1300 1510 1770 1950 2120ATC 10 230 270 590 950 950 1900 2440 2700 295011 2011-12-20
  12. 12. Road userbehaviour Alcohol X Seat belts X Technical phase Speeds X Rules and control phase Cycle helmet X Information phase Time 12 2011-12-20
  13. 13. 600 Number 500 400 300 200 New intermediate 100 target 0 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 202013 2011-12-20
  14. 14. New technologies with high potential • Impaired driving (alcohol / fatigue) • Seat belt reminders (~50% unbelted in fatal accidents) • Speed limit recognition and driver support (Speed Alert /ISA) • Autonomous emergency braking • Lane departure warning/assistance • ESC (already there!)14 2011-12-20
  15. 15. Focus on implementation- and innovation processes • Vision Zero has moved our interest from the individual road users to those who design the road transport system. • Those who design the road transport system are public and private organizations. • The questions are therefore what shape a organization and its norms and behaviors and how is it possible to influence these norms and behaviors in an effective way?15 2011-12-20
  16. 16. 16 2011-12-20
  17. 17. Thank you! matts-ake.belin@trafikverket.se17 2011-12-20

×