Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Naf powerpoint july9-2010_v5


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Naf powerpoint july9-2010_v5

  1. 1. Student Voices & Data-Driven Decision Making <br />Improving Your Academy<br />Dr. Ann G. Bessell (University of Miami)<br />Dr. Cathleen Armstead (University of Miami)<br />National Academy Foundation <br />Staff Development Institute<br />Philadelphia, PA. July, 2010<br />
  2. 2. Agenda<br />Overview and Purpose<br />Innovative Techniques: Photolanguage<br />Doing Photolanguage<br />Exploring Data-in-a-Day<br />Analyzing data sets<br />Understanding Data<br />Making Data-Driven Decisions<br />
  3. 3. Overview & Purpose<br />To Introduce Innovative Techniques for Self-Assessment & Evaluation – Photolanguage & Data-in-a-Day<br />To Explore and Practice Analyzing Data for Decision-Making Purposes<br />
  4. 4. PHOTOLANGUAGE<br />Innovative process using <br />black and white photographs <br />chosen for their: <br /><ul><li>Aesthetic qualities
  5. 5. Capacity to stimulate the imagination, memory and emotions
  6. 6. Ability to challenge the viewer for thoughtful reflection</li></li></ul><li>
  7. 7. 1<br />5<br />Arrange Photos<br />Share Selections & Significance<br />2<br />3<br />4<br />P<br />H<br />O<br />T<br />O<br />L<br />A<br />N<br />G<br />U<br />A<br />G<br />E<br />Present Focus Question<br />View Photos<br />Select Photos<br />
  8. 8. Question<br />#1<br />Choose a picture that best represents your image of a NAF student when compared to the general population of high school students.<br />Choose a picture that best represents your image of a NAF teacher or leader when compared to the general population of high school teachers.<br />Question<br />#2<br />
  9. 9. Challenges & Obstacles<br />Lack of<br /> Longitudinal Data<br />Different Data Points<br />Measuring Outcomes<br />Lack of Integrated <br />Data System<br />What’s Next<br />Lack of <br />Comparable Data<br />Teachers: <br />Not Researchers<br />Fear of Retribution<br />Class Time<br />
  10. 10. Sidney Harris's cartoon demonstrates how to get past those pesky detail steps<br />
  11. 11. Quick & Efficient<br />Improve<br />Schools<br />Participatory<br />Data-in-a Day<br /><ul><li>Observe multiple classrooms in a single day (20-30 Minutes)
  12. 12. Collect data from multiple sources - surveys - questions - observations -
  13. 13. Involve multiple stakeholders: Input from students, faculty & administrators
  14. 14. Facilitate a dialogue about school improvement strategies</li></ul> (Ginsberg & Kimball, 2008)<br />
  15. 15. Most<br />Important<br />Value<br />Listening<br />Teamwork<br />Encourages Critical Reflection<br />Important Aspects<br />Student Input<br />Promotes Dialogue<br />Representative Teams<br />
  16. 16. Our Goal<br />Desired<br />Course<br />We are <br />Here<br />Actual<br />Course<br />Where are we?<br />What is our goal?<br />What course should <br />we follow?<br />How are we doing?<br />2002<br />Assessment Committee<br />12<br />
  17. 17. Principal Involvement<br />Teachers & NAF Lead Teachers Involvement<br />Guidance Counselors<br />Explain the process<br />Encourage participation on each team<br />Review schedule<br />From the Start<br />
  18. 18. Classroom Observations<br />Review checklist with district and principals at beginning of year<br />Review with principals and teachers at the meet and greet in morning<br />10-15 minutes of classroom observation<br />
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21. Time to Practice!<br />(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski<br />
  22. 22. 1<br />5<br />Review data sets and look for patterns<br />Review & Summarize Areas to Improve<br />2<br />Aggregate Quantitative Data<br />3<br />Explore Qualitative Data<br />4<br />Review & Summarize Strengths<br />G<br />U<br />I<br />D<br />E<br />L<br />I<br />N<br />E<br />S<br />
  23. 23.
  24. 24. Time to Practice!<br />10 Minutes<br />(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski<br />
  25. 25.
  26. 26. “It sort of makes you stop and think, doesn’t it.” <br />
  27. 27. Deciding on Themes<br />More than three students mention in a classroom.<br />There is widespread agreement through nodding or shaking heads<br />Verbal agreement (That’s the truth).<br />Mentioned in more than one classroom with different observers.<br />There are positive and negative corollaries expressed.<br />
  28. 28. Common Themes<br />
  29. 29. Students’ Voice<br />What NAF promises:<br />Personalization<br />Empowerment<br />Differentiated Instruction<br />Hands-On Activities<br />Relevant Learning<br />Internships<br />Interdisciplinary projects<br />Connections to the world of work and high school<br />Learning takes place beyond the school<br />What students want:<br />Teachers who know them.<br />Teachers who listen to their opinions.<br />Hands-on Activities<br />Projects and Problem Based Learning<br />Connected to the real world<br />Field trips with assigned academic work <br />
  30. 30. Begin <br />with Questions<br />Data<br />Collection<br />Data <br />Analysis<br />Critical<br />Reflection<br />Student<br />Outcomes<br />Multiple Observers<br />Multiple Sources<br />Stakeholder Concerns<br />DECISIONS<br />
  31. 31. Data-in-a-Day<br />Approach to data collection and analysis actively engages those involved in the reform,and facilitates critical dialogue about future steps.<br />Through the collaborative process, evaluators and schools work to determine program effectiveness. <br />Consensus after gathering data leads to ongoing dialogue to determine areas on concern, potential strategies for improvement, and next steps. <br />Working collaboratively, the data-in-a-day process culminates in critical conversations about secondary school reform.<br />
  32. 32. Thank You!<br />Dr. Ann G. Bessell<br />Dr. Cathleen Armstead<br /><br /><br />