Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Technology for the Scalability of Co-Creation


Published on

PPT presentation for ASCILITE 2018

Published in: Education
  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Technology for the Scalability of Co-Creation

  1. 1. La Trobe University CRICOS Provider Code Number 00115M Technology for the Scalability of Co-Creation with Students Dr. Mollie Dollinger Associate Lecturer, Student Success @molliedollin
  2. 2. Slide 2 | Version 2 Defining Co-Creation Co-creation is an interaction between two or more unique stakeholders to jointly integrate their respective resources to provide greater benefits to all stakeholders. Therefore… 1. “Co-creation can be any creative and collective activity” (Sanders and Stappers, 2008) 2. Co-creation can be between any two stakeholder groups, or more 3. Co-creation brings together people’s resources (e.g. perspectives, ideas) however they may not be the same, nor equal to one another (Bovill, 2013) 4. Co-creation is mutually beneficial act, beyond a single person @molliedollin
  3. 3. Slide 3 | Version 2 Today’s Focus: Co-Creation in Technology @molliedollin
  4. 4. Slide 4 | Version 2 Examples • Co-creating an online learning environment • Co-creating online learning resources @molliedollin
  5. 5. Slide 5 | Version 2 But what about scale? @molliedoll
  6. 6. Slide 6 | Version 2 1. Crowdsourcing 2. Customisation 3. Prosumer Behavior Three mechanisms for scalability of co- creation in higher education @molliedollin
  7. 7. Slide 7 | Version 2 Crowdsourcing What is crowdsourcing? What are examples of crowdsourcing? Pros:  Able to scale  Easier to encourage participation  Generates lots of user ideas and preferences Cons: o Does not allow for student-staff collaboration or dialogue o Separates student and ‘expert’ ideas o Could be to difficult to integrate the disengaged o Volume of suggestions may detract from quality suggestions @molliedollin
  8. 8. Slide 8 | Version 2 Q. What is our campus missing? • We need more healthy food options! • More bookable study spaces • Free parking • A place where I can go to find out about possible future jobs • More benches near the lake
  9. 9. Slide 9 | Version 2 Customisation What is customisation? What are examples of customisation? Pros:  Able to scale  Can be a relatively easy way to begin giving students choice  Students can modify to their own preferences Cons: o Last stage modification o Often superficial o Preferences change, students may not be experts o Does not tap into students’ deep ideas or perspectives o May not benefit the group @molliedollin
  10. 10. Slide 10 | Version 2 Example: Customising Gathering and Reporting of Learning Analytics 1. What data would you be comfortable with us gathering? 2. Are you ok to have your data anonymized and aggregated to understand more about the total student population? 3. Would you like us to use your data to predict your success in subjects? 4. How often would you like emails notifications or mobile push notifications about your data?
  11. 11. Slide 11 | Version 2 Prosumer Behavior What is prosumer behavior? What are examples of prosumer behavior? Pros:  Able to scale  Students can create their own content  Students begin to think outward facing for the group  Encourages a community to form  Support social engagement peer to peer Cons: o Structure is still limiting o Does not necessarily support student- staff interaction o Risk of inauthenticity (student/staff ideas are equal?) o Power disruptor @molliedollin
  12. 12. Slide 12 | Version 2
  13. 13. Slide 13 | Version 2 Is co-creation scalable with technology? Yes! But questions we need to explore: • Does online co-creation result in the same benefits as in-person co-creation? How do benefits (student and institutional) differ? • To what extent can co-creation with technology help address transparency and equity in student-staff partnerships? @molliedollin
  14. 14. Slide 14 | Version 2 Bovill, C. (2013). Students and staff co-creating curricula: An example of good practice in higher education. The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education, 461-476. Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18. And for examples in action check out: Arthars, N., Dollinger, M., Vigentini, L., Liu, D., Kondo, E., & King, D. (forthcoming). Empowering Teachers to Personalise Learning Support and Feedback. In Ifenthaler, D., Mah, D., Yau, J. (Eds). Utilising Learning Analytics to Support Student Success. Springer. Gros, B., & López, M. (2016). Students as co-creators of technology-rich learning activities in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1-13. Khosravi, H., Cooper, K., & Kitto, K. (2017). Riple: Recommendation in peer-learning environments based on knowledge gaps and interests. JEDM: Journal of Educational Data Mining, 9(1), 42-67. References
  15. 15. La Trobe University CRICOS Provider Code Number 00115M © Copyright La Trobe University 2018 Questions?