Therestructuringandprivatisationprocess 091004054626-phpapp01


Published on


Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Therestructuringandprivatisationprocess 091004054626-phpapp01

  2. 2. Presentation layout1. Restructuring in general 1.1 Definition 1.2 Driving forces of restructuring 1.3 Objectives of restructuring 1.4 Forms of restructuring 1.5 Key issues under restructuring Context of Railway Restructuring 2.1 Definition of railway restructuring 2.2 Driving forces of railway restructuring 2.3 Objectives of railway restructuring 2.4 Key policy issues to be addressed 2.5 Structural options 2.6 Ownership 2.7 Forms of private sector participation 2.8 Privatisation concerns4. Conclusion
  3. 3. Restructuring in general Restructuring is a major change in the composition and configuration of an organisation’s assets combined with a major change in strategy. “Structure follows strategy”
  4. 4. Driving forces of restructuring globalisation of markets, consumer preferences, commerce, supply chains and financial flows rapid technological changes deregulation and trade liberalisation changing capital ownership a shift from an industrial economy to a knowledge and information based economy changing expectations and value systems growing direct foreign investment and threats to environmental sustainability. changing demographics
  5. 5. Objectives of restructuring  Optimising management processes  Enhancing performance  Reducing costs  Optimising product mix  Increasing productivity  Refocusing strategically to meet competition  Increasing sales and enhancing growth  Improving service  Controlling costs  Eliminating overlaps  Maximising utilisation of critical resources
  6. 6. Forms of restructuringThe broad forms of restructuring are;  Portfolio restructuring  Involves major changes on the mix of the firm’s main business lines through acquisitions and divestitures  Financial restructuring  concerned with changing the company’s ownership and capital structure.  Issues for consideration are debt and equity and their mix.  Organisational restructuring  fundamental changes made to the structural properties of the organisation  following either financial or portfolio restructuring to increase efficiency and effectiveness
  7. 7. Key issues under restructuring Organisation structure Stakeholder management Ownership, management & corporate governance Restructuring & employees Funding
  8. 8. Figure 1: Organisational Restructuring Framework Environmental Sustainable Institutional Leadership, Drivers Outcomes Training, Communication etc. Economic Organizational Goals Organisationa l Restructuring Social Stakeholder Influence Environmental Source: Sarkis et al (2000): Organizational Restructuring Implications for Corporate Sustainability
  9. 9. Context of railway restructuringUnited Nations (2003) identified the following railways problems;  Chronic financial deficits.  Archaic pricing systems where charges are not related to cost.  Lack of equitable fare structure and excessive fares.  Excessive costs.  Poor management and technical efficiency.  Low labour productivity.  Severely congested services.  Poor service quality  Failure of service to respond to need.  Deficiencies in physical infrastructure.  Poor asset maintenance.  Inadequate funds to invest in transport infrastructure and or services.  Low private sector participation.
  10. 10. Definition of railway restructuringThe United Nations (2003) defined railwayrestructuring as; “The adaptation of railway industry structures, institutions and business processes in response to changing customer needs and technological change”.
  11. 11. Key policy issues to be addressedHuff and Thompson(1990) & United Nations(2003) identified the following policy issues; Cost recovery from users – both operating and capital cost. Pricing policies – value of service and marginal pricing. Social service obligations – direct subsidies. Labour adjustment – optimal staff numbers. Modal competition – levelling the playing field.
  12. 12. Driving forces of railway restructuring  The need to improve railway performance (e.g. Japan, United States of America, Germany, Argentina, Mexico, Brazil & Poland)  Increased competition from other modes of transport.  The mismatch between what the railways offers and what the customers want.  Government finds it costly to fund railways.
  13. 13. Driving forces of railway restructuringcont’d  Regulatory framework that prohibits the emergence of business reactions among railway managers and consequently an improvement in financial performance.  Loss of rail market share.  The need to retain and develop the railways as an important component of the national transport system.  Regional pressures, for example in the European Union and North America Free Trade Area.  Globalisation, which stresses international linkages.
  14. 14. Objectives of railway restructuringRailway restructuring seeks to address;  commercialisation through independent management decisions  clear division of responsibility between owner governments and their railway organisations  change of culture from production orientation to market minded and customer oriented  financial viability to create independence from government financial support  streamlining the core network to serve commercially attractive traffic and/or routes  generating revenue mainly from core activities (train operations)  to have a well trained and highly motivated workforce able to achieve increased productivity.
  15. 15. Determinants of structural options Relative weight and urgency of governmental objectives. Relative importance of markets served by the railways. Available technology. Scale of railway operations as a whole. Administrative capabilities of the government and the railway. Compound nature of the cost structure – consisting of operations, infrastructure, terminal and station and administration costs. Railway infrastructure as a monopoly – efficient and economic to have a single rail network providing access to train operators. Indivisibilities – capital intensive in nature implying inability to instantly adjust capacity on a marginal basis when demand fluctuates. Public service obligations
  16. 16. Structural optionsStructural options seek to address; The degree of separation between railway infrastructure and railway services (operations) The nature and extent of competition to be created The extent of private sector participation (ownership).
  17. 17. Structural options cont’d Competitive Access Single dominant railway owning infrastructure and performing operations (integrated services) with other operators paying access fees for the usage of infrastructure. Vertical Separation (Institutional separation) Complete separation of infrastructure from operations. All operators pay access fees in order to access the infrastructure.
  18. 18. Structural options cont’d Competitive Access Advantages: ii. Performance of incremental users and assuming reasonable access fees, their operations are strengthened – regulation required to ensure availability of facilities on a “fair and equal basis”. iii. Better coordination of infrastructure investment can be achieved where there is one primary user.  Disadvantages: vi. dominant user may be unfair to minority users thereby affecting service reliability, increasing costs and safety hazards for other operators. viii. Does not promote competition
  19. 19. Structural options cont’dVertical separation Advantages:  Ensures equal access to all operators.  It places the rail transport operator into a similar position with a road operator.  Increasing economies of density.  Improving market focus by various operators.  Non-profitable services are encouraged to improve efficiency through competition for the market.  Promotes intra-rail competition.  Enhances the clarity of government policy and expenditures.  Facilitates the introduction of the private sector into rail operations.
  20. 20. Structural options cont’d Disadvantages:  May create coordination problems  Loss of economies of scale  Competition may not arise in thin markets
  21. 21. OwnershipPrivate vs Public ownership  Private sector participation in railways is expected to improve i. Efficiency ii. Investment iii. Transparency iv. Accountability v. Market focus.
  22. 22. Forms of private sector participation service contracts for; i. equipment maintenance ii. ticket issuing iii. catering etc. management contracts undertaking i. operations ii. maintenance responsibilities leasing of fixed assets to private sector leasing equipment from private sector Concessions joint ventures outright ownership of railway infrastructure and equipment.
  23. 23. Privatisation concerns Private sector does not want to invest but “sweat” existing assets  Effective regulatory framework required Private sector “cherry picking” i.e. interested in profit making services at the expense of social services; i. Unprofitable passenger services ii. Uneconomic branch lines  Government support required in this regard through a well designed institutional framework.
  24. 24. Figure 2: New Organisation Structure of Railways and Interactions between Various Subsystems. Government Regional Authorities Regulator Ministries, Central Authorities ShareholdersOperators State Owned EnterpriseState-Owned Infrastructure Management Public OrganizationNew Companies Private CompanyInfrastructure ServicesOrganizationsState Owned EnterprisesJoint VenturesPrivate Companies Other Stakeholders Social Alliances Employees
  25. 25. Conclusion Organisational restructuring is a complex exercise with a lot of diverse challenges to contend with. There are various forms of restructuring driven by various forces and organisational objectives. The organisation’s structure must follow strategy. Different organisations are therefore bound to have different structures due to the differences in strategy, size, technology and environment. Vertical Separation is generally preferred to Competitive Access for railway restructuring
  26. 26. THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTIONContact details:e-mail: