MMT Basics: You Cannot Consider the Deficit in Isolation

Mitch Green
Mitch GreenGraduate Teaching / Research Assistant
MMT Basics:
You Cannot Consider the Deficit in Isolation


                  Stephanie Kelton
          Associate Professor of Economics
          University of Missouri-Kansas City
People tend to get very emotional about the
size of the government's deficit.

MMT tries to calmly examine changes in the
size of the government's budget by focusing
on the big picture.

The following graphs reveal some important
facts about the government's budget.
The Following Graphs Show
 The US government is almost always "in the red".

 The BIGGER the government deficit, the BIGGER the
  non-government surplus.

 Because the United States runs a trade deficit with the rest
  of the world, the US government must run a deficit in order
  for the private sector to achieve a surplus.

 The Clinton surpluses occurred at the expense of the
  domestic private sector, which went deeply into negative
  territory for the first time in post-WWII history.
Clinton Surpluses
Domestic Private Surplus   Govt Surplus


10.00%
             private sector                                                                             We go “up”
          surplus/deficit as %
                  GDP
                                                                                            Clinton
                                                                                           surpluses
 5.00%




 0.00%
          19521
          19532
          19543
          19554
          19571
          19582
          19593
          19604
          19621
          19632
          19643
          19654
          19671
          19682
          19693
          19704
          19721
          19732
          19743
          19754
          19771
          19782
          19793
          19804
          19821
          19832
          19843
          19854
          19871
          19882
          19893
          19904
          19921
          19932
          19943
          19954
          19971
          19982
          19993
          20004
          20021
          20032
          20043
          20054
          20071
          20082
          20093
          20104
 -5.00%

                       public sector                                 Unprecedent private
                     surplus/deficit as                                sector deficits           Government
                          % GDP                                                                  goes “down”
-10.00%




-15.00%
            The so-called "Clinton Boom" was driven by an unsustainable increase
             in private sector debt. Extreme leverage made possible by a bubble
                                economy. It ended in recession.
-2.00%




-8.00%
         -6.00%
                  -4.00%
                                                                                                                                   10.00%




                                            0.00%
                                                           2.00%
                                                                                      4.00%
                                                                                                                  8.00%




                                                                                              6.00%
                                    19521
                                    19532
                                    19543
                                    19554
                                    19571
                                    19582
                                    19593
                                    19604
                                    19621
                                    19632
                                    19643
                                    19654
                                                                                                                        indicate




                                    19671
                                                                                                                       grey bars

                                                                                                                      recessions




                                    19682
                                    19693
                                    19704
                                    19721
                                    19732
                                    19743
                                    19754
                                    19771
                                    19782
                                    19793
                                    19804
                                    19821
                                    19832
                                    19843
                                    19854
                                    19871
                                    19882
                                    19893
                                    19904
                                    19921
                                    19932
                                    19943
                                    19954
                                    19971
                                    19982
                                                                                                    balance
                                                                                                    (% GDP)




                                    19993
                                                                                                 private sector




                                    20004
                                    20021
                                    20032
                                    20043
                                                             big government




                                    20054
                                                           We achieved this big


                                                          deficits after the crisis
                                                          surplus because of the




                                    20071
                                    20082
                                    20093
                                    20104
0
                                                                                                                                   1




                                                    0.5
Read and Return to Previous Slide

     Notice how the private sector’s balance
  (blue line) declines in the period leading up to
                   each recession.

It takes government deficits to prevent the decline
  in private balances (or to repair private balance
              sheets after a recession).

This is why MMT is not hostile to deficit spending.
To learn more about MMT, follow us on Twitter
        @deficitowl and read our blog
      www.neweconomicperspectives.org
1 of 8

More Related Content

Similar to MMT Basics: You Cannot Consider the Deficit in Isolation

Foreign Aid & ConflictForeign Aid & Conflict
Foreign Aid & ConflictVaqar Ahmed
3.1K views39 slides
SIU AEC Aug 2011 SIU AEC Aug 2011
SIU AEC Aug 2011 chaismart
1.1K views16 slides
SIU AEC aug 2011 SIU AEC aug 2011
SIU AEC aug 2011 chaismart
201 views16 slides

Similar to MMT Basics: You Cannot Consider the Deficit in Isolation(20)

Market returns over timeMarket returns over time
Market returns over time
robichaud92 views
Foreign Aid & ConflictForeign Aid & Conflict
Foreign Aid & Conflict
Vaqar Ahmed3.1K views
SIU AEC Aug 2011 SIU AEC Aug 2011
SIU AEC Aug 2011
chaismart1.1K views
SIU AEC aug 2011 SIU AEC aug 2011
SIU AEC aug 2011
chaismart201 views
2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate
2003 Soa.Washington.Low Rate
pinchung419 views
Crop Presentation (10.12.07)Crop Presentation (10.12.07)
Crop Presentation (10.12.07)
apulvermache281 views
EconEcon
Econ
btibbitt123 views
Producer and Industry Funding of R&D in AfricaProducer and Industry Funding of R&D in Africa
Producer and Industry Funding of R&D in Africa
Agricultural Science & Technology Indicators (ASTI)490 views
Cigarette excise tax add data 04 11Cigarette excise tax add data 04 11
Cigarette excise tax add data 04 11
Maine Public Health Association Tobacco Policy Subcommittee and Friends of the FHM373 views
G7 Labour Market DashboardG7 Labour Market Dashboard
G7 Labour Market Dashboard
International Labour Organization1.4K views
BLS Numbers on JobsBLS Numbers on Jobs
BLS Numbers on Jobs
Mercatus Center762 views
Outlook January 2013Outlook January 2013
Outlook January 2013
Greater Memphis Chamber465 views
2013 Industry Trends2013 Industry Trends
2013 Industry Trends
Greater Chapel Hill Association of REALTORS323 views
Designing a Strategy for Economic RecoveryDesigning a Strategy for Economic Recovery
Designing a Strategy for Economic Recovery
Stephen Kinsella451 views
Use of Micro and Macro Frameworks in Estimating Poverty Implications of Chang...Use of Micro and Macro Frameworks in Estimating Poverty Implications of Chang...
Use of Micro and Macro Frameworks in Estimating Poverty Implications of Chang...
African Growth and Development Policy (AGRODEP) Modeling Consortium1.2K views
Myanmar and Asia EconomiesMyanmar and Asia Economies
Myanmar and Asia Economies
KaungHtetZawSMU467 views

More from Mitch Green

Berg fig 1Berg fig 1
Berg fig 1Mitch Green
1.5K views20 slides
Two views of moneyTwo views of money
Two views of moneyMitch Green
2K views10 slides
War on PovertyWar on Poverty
War on PovertyMitch Green
2.5K views50 slides
Money is No ObjectMoney is No Object
Money is No ObjectMitch Green
57.3K views46 slides

More from Mitch Green(16)

Berg fig 1Berg fig 1
Berg fig 1
Mitch Green1.5K views
Two views of moneyTwo views of money
Two views of money
Mitch Green2K views
This Could Change EverythingThis Could Change Everything
This Could Change Everything
Mitch Green2.2K views
War on PovertyWar on Poverty
War on Poverty
Mitch Green2.5K views
Money is No ObjectMoney is No Object
Money is No Object
Mitch Green57.3K views
Did Greenspan "Blow" It?Did Greenspan "Blow" It?
Did Greenspan "Blow" It?
Mitch Green1.8K views
Lesson 1:  What is Money?Lesson 1:  What is Money?
Lesson 1: What is Money?
Mitch Green16.8K views
MODERN MONEY AND FUNCTIONAL FINANCEMODERN MONEY AND FUNCTIONAL FINANCE
MODERN MONEY AND FUNCTIONAL FINANCE
Mitch Green8.6K views
How to Teach MoneyHow to Teach Money
How to Teach Money
Mitch Green7K views
Who Says the Gov't Can't Create JobsWho Says the Gov't Can't Create Jobs
Who Says the Gov't Can't Create Jobs
Mitch Green2.6K views

MMT Basics: You Cannot Consider the Deficit in Isolation

  • 1. MMT Basics: You Cannot Consider the Deficit in Isolation Stephanie Kelton Associate Professor of Economics University of Missouri-Kansas City
  • 2. People tend to get very emotional about the size of the government's deficit. MMT tries to calmly examine changes in the size of the government's budget by focusing on the big picture. The following graphs reveal some important facts about the government's budget.
  • 3. The Following Graphs Show  The US government is almost always "in the red".  The BIGGER the government deficit, the BIGGER the non-government surplus.  Because the United States runs a trade deficit with the rest of the world, the US government must run a deficit in order for the private sector to achieve a surplus.  The Clinton surpluses occurred at the expense of the domestic private sector, which went deeply into negative territory for the first time in post-WWII history.
  • 5. Domestic Private Surplus Govt Surplus 10.00% private sector We go “up” surplus/deficit as % GDP Clinton surpluses 5.00% 0.00% 19521 19532 19543 19554 19571 19582 19593 19604 19621 19632 19643 19654 19671 19682 19693 19704 19721 19732 19743 19754 19771 19782 19793 19804 19821 19832 19843 19854 19871 19882 19893 19904 19921 19932 19943 19954 19971 19982 19993 20004 20021 20032 20043 20054 20071 20082 20093 20104 -5.00% public sector Unprecedent private surplus/deficit as sector deficits Government % GDP goes “down” -10.00% -15.00% The so-called "Clinton Boom" was driven by an unsustainable increase in private sector debt. Extreme leverage made possible by a bubble economy. It ended in recession.
  • 6. -2.00% -8.00% -6.00% -4.00% 10.00% 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 8.00% 6.00% 19521 19532 19543 19554 19571 19582 19593 19604 19621 19632 19643 19654 indicate 19671 grey bars recessions 19682 19693 19704 19721 19732 19743 19754 19771 19782 19793 19804 19821 19832 19843 19854 19871 19882 19893 19904 19921 19932 19943 19954 19971 19982 balance (% GDP) 19993 private sector 20004 20021 20032 20043 big government 20054 We achieved this big deficits after the crisis surplus because of the 20071 20082 20093 20104 0 1 0.5
  • 7. Read and Return to Previous Slide Notice how the private sector’s balance (blue line) declines in the period leading up to each recession. It takes government deficits to prevent the decline in private balances (or to repair private balance sheets after a recession). This is why MMT is not hostile to deficit spending.
  • 8. To learn more about MMT, follow us on Twitter @deficitowl and read our blog www.neweconomicperspectives.org