Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Personal data and blockchain: Opportunities and Challenges - Michele Nati - Lead Technologist Personal Data and Trust - Digital Catapult

9,577 views

Published on

Presentation at My Data Conference 2016 - MyData2016 - Personal Data and Blockchain session

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Personal data and blockchain: Opportunities and Challenges - Michele Nati - Lead Technologist Personal Data and Trust - Digital Catapult

  1. 1. Personal data and blockchain: Opportunities and Challenges MyData 2016 Conference Day 1, August 31st, Helsinki Session: Blockchain and Personal Data Michele Nati Lead Technologist Personal Data and Trust Digital Catapult, London @michelenati
  2. 2. Personal Data: Opportunities •  Overall financial benefit •  £15bn  untapped  wealth  for  UK   consumers   •  The incentive to share •  30%  of  consumers  believe  “to  improve   services  and  benefit”  is  the  most   important  incen5ve  for  sharing  personal   data   •  How to incentivize •  43%  said  the  main  incen=ve  for  sharing   personal  data  is  if  it  was  going  to  be  used   to  improve  society   Personal  Data  and  Trust  Review:  h<ps://www.digitalcatapultcentre.org.uk/pdtreview/  
  3. 3. Personal Data: Barriers •  Trust •  44%  of  consumers  trust  the  public  sector   most  with  their  personal  data   •  2%  choose  telecoms  as  the  most  trusted   sector   •  30%  feel  the  retail  sector  is  not  clear  on   how  use  their  personal  data   •  Consent •  65%  of  consumers  are  insure  if  data  is   shared  without  their  consent   •  Loosing control •  76%  of  consumers  feel  they  have  no   control  over  how  their  data  is  shared  or   who  with   Personal  Data  and  Trust  Review:  h<ps://www.digitalcatapultcentre.org.uk/pdtreview/  
  4. 4. Personal Data Ecosystem •  How data can be linked together? •  How access can be granted and controlled? •  How all involved parties can trust each others? •  How the right incentives can be created?
  5. 5. Blockchain in 2015 h<p://www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-­‐cycle.jsp  
  6. 6. Blockchain in 2016 h<p://www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-­‐cycle.jsp  
  7. 7. Blockchain Ecosystem •  Blockchain: business case vs trust case •  Bitcoin: (and alt-coins) interoperable incentives within the ecosystem •  Smart Contracts: consent management •  Decentralized and Autonomous Organizations (DAOs): data sharing for social benefits and causes
  8. 8. Do you need blockchain? 1.  Consensus – is the use case benefiting from agreement across all the parties that each transaction is validated without 3rd party? 2.  Provenance – is the maintenance of a complete audit trail important for the use case? 3.  Immutability – is it important that the trail of transactions cannot be altered? 4.  Liquid trust – is there a need for an agreed “system of record” trusted by the all network?
  9. 9. Blockchain and identity •  Role in the Personal Data ecosystem •  Link  all  the  data  to  one  individual   •  Be<er  and  personalized  services  –  combining  different  a<ributes   •  Identities should be •  Sovereign   •  Unique  and  interoperable   •  Verified   •  Mul5ple  and  context-­‐based  (mul5ple  personas)   •  Blockchain role •  (Decentralized)  User-­‐managed   •  Consensus  –  new  forms  of  iden5ty  (for  unbanked)   •  Notary  func5on  -­‐  Integrity   •  Audit  trail  –  non-­‐repudiable   •  Confiden5ality?  (requires  some  thoughts)     (Attributes) Verification might still require 3rd party
  10. 10. BC and PD ecosystem: An example
  11. 11. Blockchain and Personal Data: An example Benefits distribution and tracking •  Assign coins with clause on how they are spent (alt-coin) •  Require to verify identities Possible Risks (to address): •  (might) Leak privacy on people identity (e.g. zero-knowledge proof required) •  Pseudonyms could be de-anonymized •  Deal with malicious behavior (in ethical way; this might require third party authorities) h<p://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-­‐36785872  
  12. 12. Blockchain evolution h<ps://www.digitale-­‐exzellenz.de/die-­‐blockchain-­‐evolu5on/   2009  BitCoin  blockchain  implementa5on   -­‐  Criminal  ac5vity   -­‐  2016:  AML  EU  regula5on  h<p://ec.europa.eu/jus5ce/criminal/document/files/aml-­‐direc5ve_en.pdf  
  13. 13. Blockchain evolution h<ps://www.digitale-­‐exzellenz.de/die-­‐blockchain-­‐evolu5on/   2013  Ethereum  Smart  Contracts  presented   -­‐  Security  and  scalability  concerns   -­‐  July  2015  launch  aber  crowdsale  campaign    
  14. 14. Blockchain evolution h<ps://www.digitale-­‐exzellenz.de/die-­‐blockchain-­‐evolu5on/   2016  May  daohub.org  launch   -­‐  DAO  hacked   -­‐  June  2016  hard  fork  
  15. 15. Blockchain evolution h<ps://www.digitale-­‐exzellenz.de/die-­‐blockchain-­‐evolu5on/   ?  ML/AI  will  run  organiza5ons   -­‐  What  kind  of  control  we  need?   -­‐  How  we  guarantee  ethical  decision?  
  16. 16. Blockchain evolution h<ps://www.digitale-­‐exzellenz.de/die-­‐blockchain-­‐evolu5on/  
  17. 17. Blockchain evolution h<ps://www.digitale-­‐exzellenz.de/die-­‐blockchain-­‐evolu5on/  
  18. 18. Governance in decentralized systems •  Everybody can use blockchain, run smart contracts, participate to DAOs •  But who takes decisions? •  Currently  developers  and  miners   •  SW  licenses  generally  disclaim  all  liabili5es   •  Who should be accountable for malicious behavior? •  Not  yet  well-­‐defined   •  Shall  core  developers  and  miners  be  considered  as  fiduciaries?  (duty  of  care,   loyalty  and  good  faith)   •  What governance structure will be required?
  19. 19. THANK YOU! #DigiCatapult info@digicatapult.org.uk 0300 1233 101 Digital Catapult digicatapult.org.uk /DigitalCatapult @DigitalCatapult

×