Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Net Promoter Score

11,485 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology

Net Promoter Score

  1. 1. NET PROMOTER SCORE (NPS) Benefits & Drawbacks28.04.2008Michael Waltinger & Jörg Milde
  2. 2. NET PROMOTER SCORE (NPS)Stuttgart Media University | Summer Term 2008
  3. 3. BACKGROUND Chart 3SOURCE: REICHHELD, FRED (2003-12): HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW
  4. 4. THE ULTIMATE QUESTION “HOW LIKELY IS IT THAT YOU WOULD RECOMMEND OUR COMPANY TO FRIENDS OR COLLEAGUES?” Chart 4SOURCE: REICHHELD, FRED (2006): THE ULTIMATE QUESTION
  5. 5. THE ULTIMATE QUESTION “HOW LIKELY IS IT THAT YOU WOULD RECOMMEND OUR COMPANY TO FRIENDS OR COLLEAGUES?” EXTREMELY NOT LIKELY LIKELY AT ALL 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 PROMOTER PASSIVE DETRACTOR Chart 5SOURCE: REICHHELD, FRED (2006): THE ULTIMATE QUESTION
  6. 6. NET PROMOTER SCORE (NPS) EXTREMELY NOT LIKELY LIKELY AT ALL 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 PROMOTER PASSIVE DETRACTOR E.G. 70 % E.G. 10 % E.G. 20 % PROMOTERS (70 %) – DETRACTORS (20 %) = NPS (50) Chart 6SOURCE: REICHHELD, FRED (2006): THE ULTIMATE QUESTION
  7. 7. NET PROMOTER SCORE (NPS) Chart 7SOURCE: NET PROMOTER INDUSTRY REPORT FINANCIAL SERVICES (2007) - BASED ON BAIN OR SATAMETRIXSURVEYS
  8. 8. NET PROMOTER SCORE (NPS)¢  Loyalty/Growth-Indicator¢  Word of Mouth-Index¢  Proven empirical relevance of recommendations¢  Simple to survey and assess (no „Black Box-Index ) Chart 8SOURCE: VOCATUS (2007): DER NPS AUS SICHT DER MARKTFORSCHUNG; GOLDMAN (2008): MEASURE THE LOVE
  9. 9. CRITICISM ON THE NPSStuttgart Media University | Summer Term 2008
  10. 10. Net Promotor Score Basics¢  NPS developed by Fred Reichheld and Consulting Agency Bain & Company¢  Main Criticism by Market Research Institutes Chart 10
  11. 11. NPS DRAWBACKS I¢  Just an Index, not a dedicated forecasting model¢  Not content relevant¢  MissingDimensions - Involvement - Attractivity of alternatives¢  Only Promotors and Detractors relevant - 20% in upper scale segment missing (passives?) Chart 11¢  Difference between ‚intention‘ and ‚action‘
  12. 12. NPS DRAWBACKS II¢  No international, intercultural comparability Chart 12à Cultures tend to vote on scales differently
  13. 13. NPS DRAWBACKS III¢  Notapplicable on all branches à different importance of mouth to mouth propaganda in various branches - low involvement: toilet brushes - high involvement: tourism industry¢  Ashby s law “The larger the variety of actions available to a control system, the larger the variety of perturbations it is able to compensate.” Chart 13
  14. 14. CONCLUSION¢  NPSrepresents only a tiny piece of empirical research.¢  NPSas a stand alone method to determine customer loyalty it not valid NPS as a first indicator which needs to be¢  à extended through further market research methods in order to create reliable results Chart 14
  15. 15. Thanks a lot & take care! Chart 15

×