SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Background
The 1998 Atlantic hurricane season reared its fitful head with unexpected intensity, proving to
be the worst hurricane season in the last 200 years. In September alone, four hurricanes—
Georges, Ivan, Jeanne, and Karl—slammed the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States
like a wrecking ball, devastating nearly everything in their paths. Not since 1893 had these east-
ern coasts dealt with such meteorological chaos during the course of one month.
The second largest of the September hurricanes was Georges, which rampaged across the
Caribbean, the Florida Keys, and into the Mississippi Delta with sustained winds of 150
miles/hour (241 km/hr) driving torrential rain. About six months before the storm arrived, a par-
ticular drainage channel located merely five miles from the coast near Gulfport, Mississippi was
used as grounds for comparing the erosion control performance of North American Green’s
C350 to that of standard 12 inch, fabric-backed rock riprap. Although unforeseen, the ensuing
hurricane activity provided the ultimate testing grounds for such a comparison.
Problem
The drainage channel was designed with a 30-50 foot (9-15 meter) wide bottom, 2:1 side slopes,
and a 2 percent bed slope gradient to handle 100 year storm drainage from thousands of acres
of both agricultural and residential land. An important engineering consideration was the fine
textured, highly erodible white sand blanketing the area. Such fine-grained material provides lit-
tle resistance to the force of flowing water, being easily displaced by flows exerting shear stress
as low as 0.02 lbs/ft2
. As well, the sand has very poor moisture holding capacity, making it a dif-
ficult medium for the establishment of vegetation.
To protect against erosion and re-estab-
lish turf, the side slopes of the channel
were covered with North American
Green’s C350 as supplied by Geo-
Products, Inc. in Madison, MS. In areas
where inlet pipes drain into the channel
and bends occur, the engineering plan
called for fabric-underlain 12 inch (30
cm) rock riprap. However, six months
after installation of the C350 and riprap,
Hurricane Georges ushered in the sec-
ond of two violent storms to impact the
channel within weeks of one another.
The prevailing storm proved to be the last for the already frail riprap lining sections of the chan-
nel. With flow estimated in excess of 2500 cubic feet per second (ft3
/s) [71 (m3
/s)] flood water
topped the 15 foot (4.57 m) high channel banks by two feet (60 cm).This high channel flow acted
to undermine the fabric-underlain rock riprap, carrying away a significant amount of soil and
hurling rock down the channel’s bed.
CASE
STUDY
Volume 5
Number 2
Nov. 1999
14649 Highway 41 North
Evansville, Indiana 47711
812-867-6632 In Indiana
1-800-772-2040
1-800-448-2040 In Canada
FAX 812-867-0247
Hurricane Forces
Prove C350’s Superiority
To Rock Riprap
Solution
Designed as a permanent channel lining, the C350 incorpo-
rates a coconut fiber matrix sewn between a permanent
three-dimensional polypropylene net structure. This dense
coconut fiber matrix allows the matting to provide the required
temporary erosion protection for the underlying soil prior to
vegetation establishment. After establishment, the C350’s net
structure permanently reinforces grasses at the stem and root
systems, providing increased structural stability for the loose
sandy soils.
In sharp contrast to the riprap sections, there was no appre-
ciable damage to the C350 or significant removal of soil from beneath the matting. Likewise, vegetation that had
established through the matting remained intact throughout the intense channel flows. The C350’s organic fiber
matrix acted to effectively retain moisture on the sandy soil surface, aiding in rapid seed germination and plant
growth. Although Hurricane Georges impacted the coast before vegetation became fully established in the chan-
nel, the high tensile strength of the C350’s three dimen-
sional net structure was able to resist damage even
when entire mature trees were dragged across its
surface and deposited by the flood waters. Published
installation instructions were closely followed and the
contractor was careful to entrench all terminal edges to
reduce the probability of the mat being undermined.
Because of the non-cohesive sandy soils, 12 inch
(30 cm) steel pins were used to better secure the C350.
Even with only a partial vegetative cover established,
the C350 had formed a strong barrier to resist
the tremendously erosive forces of wind-driven water in
the channel.
Results
“The C350 saved that channel,” proclaimed
the contractor after flood waters had reced-
ed and the damage could be assessed.
Nearly a year and a half later, much of the
damaged rock riprap is, not surprisingly,
being replaced by North American Green’s
C350. The C350 performed its intended
function flawlessly in the face of dire cir-
cumstances at only $7.00/yd2
installed—a
rather inexpensive endeavor considering
the failed rock riprap came at a cost of
about $24.00/yd2
. Thanks to the C350 mat-
ting, the channel in Gulfport, Mississippi is
rapidly recovering much as the surrounding
communities are in the wake of 1998’s
relentless hurricane season.

More Related Content

What's hot

Construction techniques in flood prone areas
Construction techniques in flood prone areasConstruction techniques in flood prone areas
Construction techniques in flood prone areasSanjay gowda
 
Coastal Erosion Notes
Coastal Erosion NotesCoastal Erosion Notes
Coastal Erosion Notesmgitterm
 
Coastal erosion and engineering aspect
Coastal erosion and engineering aspectCoastal erosion and engineering aspect
Coastal erosion and engineering aspectPramoda Raj
 
Sedimentary depositional environments
Sedimentary depositional environmentsSedimentary depositional environments
Sedimentary depositional environmentsuos
 
The 5 largest dams and their ecological impact
The 5 largest dams and their ecological impact The 5 largest dams and their ecological impact
The 5 largest dams and their ecological impact Bangkok Advent School
 
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: 8.1 WAVES MARINE AND ...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: 8.1 WAVES MARINE AND ...CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: 8.1 WAVES MARINE AND ...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: 8.1 WAVES MARINE AND ...George Dumitrache
 
Marginal marine depositional environments
Marginal marine depositional environmentsMarginal marine depositional environments
Marginal marine depositional environmentsManikanta Sjs
 
Explosive Compaction of Foundation Soils Seymour Falls Dam
Explosive Compaction of Foundation Soils Seymour Falls DamExplosive Compaction of Foundation Soils Seymour Falls Dam
Explosive Compaction of Foundation Soils Seymour Falls DamDario Gnoato
 
Coastal environments - A level Geography
Coastal environments - A level GeographyCoastal environments - A level Geography
Coastal environments - A level GeographyBrittany Farrant
 
importance of shelf edge delta for hydrocarbon exploration
importance of shelf edge delta for hydrocarbon explorationimportance of shelf edge delta for hydrocarbon exploration
importance of shelf edge delta for hydrocarbon explorationAbzal Alpysbayev
 
Coastal erosion(final presentation)
Coastal erosion(final presentation)Coastal erosion(final presentation)
Coastal erosion(final presentation)Vampire Secret
 
Natural Disasters Topic 8 (Drainage Basins & Rivers)
Natural Disasters Topic 8 (Drainage Basins & Rivers)Natural Disasters Topic 8 (Drainage Basins & Rivers)
Natural Disasters Topic 8 (Drainage Basins & Rivers)William W. Little
 
Chapter20 coastal processes
Chapter20 coastal processesChapter20 coastal processes
Chapter20 coastal processesashtonx
 
Coastal Morphology
Coastal MorphologyCoastal Morphology
Coastal MorphologyJames Foster
 
Methods of flood control
Methods of flood controlMethods of flood control
Methods of flood controlDharmesh Vadher
 

What's hot (20)

Construction techniques in flood prone areas
Construction techniques in flood prone areasConstruction techniques in flood prone areas
Construction techniques in flood prone areas
 
Flood
FloodFlood
Flood
 
Saltmarsh dynamics
Saltmarsh dynamicsSaltmarsh dynamics
Saltmarsh dynamics
 
Coastal Erosion Notes
Coastal Erosion NotesCoastal Erosion Notes
Coastal Erosion Notes
 
Coastal erosion
Coastal erosionCoastal erosion
Coastal erosion
 
Coastal erosion and engineering aspect
Coastal erosion and engineering aspectCoastal erosion and engineering aspect
Coastal erosion and engineering aspect
 
Sedimentary depositional environments
Sedimentary depositional environmentsSedimentary depositional environments
Sedimentary depositional environments
 
The 5 largest dams and their ecological impact
The 5 largest dams and their ecological impact The 5 largest dams and their ecological impact
The 5 largest dams and their ecological impact
 
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: 8.1 WAVES MARINE AND ...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: 8.1 WAVES MARINE AND ...CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: 8.1 WAVES MARINE AND ...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: 8.1 WAVES MARINE AND ...
 
Marginal marine depositional environments
Marginal marine depositional environmentsMarginal marine depositional environments
Marginal marine depositional environments
 
Explosive Compaction of Foundation Soils Seymour Falls Dam
Explosive Compaction of Foundation Soils Seymour Falls DamExplosive Compaction of Foundation Soils Seymour Falls Dam
Explosive Compaction of Foundation Soils Seymour Falls Dam
 
Coastal environments - A level Geography
Coastal environments - A level GeographyCoastal environments - A level Geography
Coastal environments - A level Geography
 
importance of shelf edge delta for hydrocarbon exploration
importance of shelf edge delta for hydrocarbon explorationimportance of shelf edge delta for hydrocarbon exploration
importance of shelf edge delta for hydrocarbon exploration
 
Coastal erosion(final presentation)
Coastal erosion(final presentation)Coastal erosion(final presentation)
Coastal erosion(final presentation)
 
Natural Disasters Topic 8 (Drainage Basins & Rivers)
Natural Disasters Topic 8 (Drainage Basins & Rivers)Natural Disasters Topic 8 (Drainage Basins & Rivers)
Natural Disasters Topic 8 (Drainage Basins & Rivers)
 
Design of flood control structures
Design of flood control structuresDesign of flood control structures
Design of flood control structures
 
Chapter20 coastal processes
Chapter20 coastal processesChapter20 coastal processes
Chapter20 coastal processes
 
The coasts igcse
The coasts igcseThe coasts igcse
The coasts igcse
 
Coastal Morphology
Coastal MorphologyCoastal Morphology
Coastal Morphology
 
Methods of flood control
Methods of flood controlMethods of flood control
Methods of flood control
 

Similar to Ec rmx cs_ms_gulfport_channel

Expert Report on Geologic Hazards in the Karst Regions of Virginia and West V...
Expert Report on Geologic Hazards in the Karst Regions of Virginia and West V...Expert Report on Geologic Hazards in the Karst Regions of Virginia and West V...
Expert Report on Geologic Hazards in the Karst Regions of Virginia and West V...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Flood resilient presentation 05.16.12
Flood resilient presentation 05.16.12Flood resilient presentation 05.16.12
Flood resilient presentation 05.16.12Christopher Hayes
 
Landslides Causes and Prevention ppt
Landslides Causes and Prevention pptLandslides Causes and Prevention ppt
Landslides Causes and Prevention pptUmair Azam
 
CRS Research & Report
CRS Research & ReportCRS Research & Report
CRS Research & ReportGary Mitchell
 
CAPE Geography Cape '06 u1 p2- #5
CAPE Geography Cape '06 u1 p2- #5CAPE Geography Cape '06 u1 p2- #5
CAPE Geography Cape '06 u1 p2- #5Liam Nabbal
 
Impacts of climate change on the coasts of
Impacts of climate change on the coasts ofImpacts of climate change on the coasts of
Impacts of climate change on the coasts ofjorubelle
 
Ec smx cs_va_roanoke
Ec smx cs_va_roanokeEc smx cs_va_roanoke
Ec smx cs_va_roanokeTensar
 
Colusa_11_FloodMgmt
Colusa_11_FloodMgmtColusa_11_FloodMgmt
Colusa_11_FloodMgmtAhmad Mousa
 
ARMF 2014 USCG Technical Paper
ARMF 2014 USCG Technical PaperARMF 2014 USCG Technical Paper
ARMF 2014 USCG Technical PaperJanna Ellis Kepley
 
coastalrestoration
coastalrestorationcoastalrestoration
coastalrestorationAnne Roberts
 
DRRR – Other Geological Hazards
DRRR – Other Geological HazardsDRRR – Other Geological Hazards
DRRR – Other Geological HazardsReid Manares
 
Niagara
NiagaraNiagara
Niagaraaea_aa
 

Similar to Ec rmx cs_ms_gulfport_channel (20)

Ec rmx cs_ky_waterfront_park
Ec rmx cs_ky_waterfront_parkEc rmx cs_ky_waterfront_park
Ec rmx cs_ky_waterfront_park
 
Expert Report on Geologic Hazards in the Karst Regions of Virginia and West V...
Expert Report on Geologic Hazards in the Karst Regions of Virginia and West V...Expert Report on Geologic Hazards in the Karst Regions of Virginia and West V...
Expert Report on Geologic Hazards in the Karst Regions of Virginia and West V...
 
Flood resilient presentation 05.16.12
Flood resilient presentation 05.16.12Flood resilient presentation 05.16.12
Flood resilient presentation 05.16.12
 
Massachusetts' Rivers Response to Tropical Storm Irene
Massachusetts' Rivers Response to Tropical Storm IreneMassachusetts' Rivers Response to Tropical Storm Irene
Massachusetts' Rivers Response to Tropical Storm Irene
 
Landslides Causes and Prevention ppt
Landslides Causes and Prevention pptLandslides Causes and Prevention ppt
Landslides Causes and Prevention ppt
 
CRS Research & Report
CRS Research & ReportCRS Research & Report
CRS Research & Report
 
Coastal processes ref
Coastal processes refCoastal processes ref
Coastal processes ref
 
Ec rmx cs_in_white_river
Ec rmx cs_in_white_riverEc rmx cs_in_white_river
Ec rmx cs_in_white_river
 
Ec rmx cs_wy_yellowstone
Ec rmx cs_wy_yellowstoneEc rmx cs_wy_yellowstone
Ec rmx cs_wy_yellowstone
 
CAPE Geography Cape '06 u1 p2- #5
CAPE Geography Cape '06 u1 p2- #5CAPE Geography Cape '06 u1 p2- #5
CAPE Geography Cape '06 u1 p2- #5
 
Impacts of climate change on the coasts of
Impacts of climate change on the coasts ofImpacts of climate change on the coasts of
Impacts of climate change on the coasts of
 
Ec smx cs_va_roanoke
Ec smx cs_va_roanokeEc smx cs_va_roanoke
Ec smx cs_va_roanoke
 
Ec smx cs_va_roanoke
Ec smx cs_va_roanokeEc smx cs_va_roanoke
Ec smx cs_va_roanoke
 
Colusa_11_FloodMgmt
Colusa_11_FloodMgmtColusa_11_FloodMgmt
Colusa_11_FloodMgmt
 
Coastal Processes ppt
Coastal Processes pptCoastal Processes ppt
Coastal Processes ppt
 
ARMF 2014 USCG Technical Paper
ARMF 2014 USCG Technical PaperARMF 2014 USCG Technical Paper
ARMF 2014 USCG Technical Paper
 
coastalrestoration
coastalrestorationcoastalrestoration
coastalrestoration
 
FLOODS PART II. THE GLOBAL DISASTER LABORATORY MODEL. AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK...
FLOODS PART II. THE GLOBAL DISASTER LABORATORY MODEL. AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK...FLOODS PART II. THE GLOBAL DISASTER LABORATORY MODEL. AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK...
FLOODS PART II. THE GLOBAL DISASTER LABORATORY MODEL. AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK...
 
DRRR – Other Geological Hazards
DRRR – Other Geological HazardsDRRR – Other Geological Hazards
DRRR – Other Geological Hazards
 
Niagara
NiagaraNiagara
Niagara
 

Ec rmx cs_ms_gulfport_channel

  • 1. Background The 1998 Atlantic hurricane season reared its fitful head with unexpected intensity, proving to be the worst hurricane season in the last 200 years. In September alone, four hurricanes— Georges, Ivan, Jeanne, and Karl—slammed the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States like a wrecking ball, devastating nearly everything in their paths. Not since 1893 had these east- ern coasts dealt with such meteorological chaos during the course of one month. The second largest of the September hurricanes was Georges, which rampaged across the Caribbean, the Florida Keys, and into the Mississippi Delta with sustained winds of 150 miles/hour (241 km/hr) driving torrential rain. About six months before the storm arrived, a par- ticular drainage channel located merely five miles from the coast near Gulfport, Mississippi was used as grounds for comparing the erosion control performance of North American Green’s C350 to that of standard 12 inch, fabric-backed rock riprap. Although unforeseen, the ensuing hurricane activity provided the ultimate testing grounds for such a comparison. Problem The drainage channel was designed with a 30-50 foot (9-15 meter) wide bottom, 2:1 side slopes, and a 2 percent bed slope gradient to handle 100 year storm drainage from thousands of acres of both agricultural and residential land. An important engineering consideration was the fine textured, highly erodible white sand blanketing the area. Such fine-grained material provides lit- tle resistance to the force of flowing water, being easily displaced by flows exerting shear stress as low as 0.02 lbs/ft2 . As well, the sand has very poor moisture holding capacity, making it a dif- ficult medium for the establishment of vegetation. To protect against erosion and re-estab- lish turf, the side slopes of the channel were covered with North American Green’s C350 as supplied by Geo- Products, Inc. in Madison, MS. In areas where inlet pipes drain into the channel and bends occur, the engineering plan called for fabric-underlain 12 inch (30 cm) rock riprap. However, six months after installation of the C350 and riprap, Hurricane Georges ushered in the sec- ond of two violent storms to impact the channel within weeks of one another. The prevailing storm proved to be the last for the already frail riprap lining sections of the chan- nel. With flow estimated in excess of 2500 cubic feet per second (ft3 /s) [71 (m3 /s)] flood water topped the 15 foot (4.57 m) high channel banks by two feet (60 cm).This high channel flow acted to undermine the fabric-underlain rock riprap, carrying away a significant amount of soil and hurling rock down the channel’s bed. CASE STUDY Volume 5 Number 2 Nov. 1999 14649 Highway 41 North Evansville, Indiana 47711 812-867-6632 In Indiana 1-800-772-2040 1-800-448-2040 In Canada FAX 812-867-0247 Hurricane Forces Prove C350’s Superiority To Rock Riprap
  • 2. Solution Designed as a permanent channel lining, the C350 incorpo- rates a coconut fiber matrix sewn between a permanent three-dimensional polypropylene net structure. This dense coconut fiber matrix allows the matting to provide the required temporary erosion protection for the underlying soil prior to vegetation establishment. After establishment, the C350’s net structure permanently reinforces grasses at the stem and root systems, providing increased structural stability for the loose sandy soils. In sharp contrast to the riprap sections, there was no appre- ciable damage to the C350 or significant removal of soil from beneath the matting. Likewise, vegetation that had established through the matting remained intact throughout the intense channel flows. The C350’s organic fiber matrix acted to effectively retain moisture on the sandy soil surface, aiding in rapid seed germination and plant growth. Although Hurricane Georges impacted the coast before vegetation became fully established in the chan- nel, the high tensile strength of the C350’s three dimen- sional net structure was able to resist damage even when entire mature trees were dragged across its surface and deposited by the flood waters. Published installation instructions were closely followed and the contractor was careful to entrench all terminal edges to reduce the probability of the mat being undermined. Because of the non-cohesive sandy soils, 12 inch (30 cm) steel pins were used to better secure the C350. Even with only a partial vegetative cover established, the C350 had formed a strong barrier to resist the tremendously erosive forces of wind-driven water in the channel. Results “The C350 saved that channel,” proclaimed the contractor after flood waters had reced- ed and the damage could be assessed. Nearly a year and a half later, much of the damaged rock riprap is, not surprisingly, being replaced by North American Green’s C350. The C350 performed its intended function flawlessly in the face of dire cir- cumstances at only $7.00/yd2 installed—a rather inexpensive endeavor considering the failed rock riprap came at a cost of about $24.00/yd2 . Thanks to the C350 mat- ting, the channel in Gulfport, Mississippi is rapidly recovering much as the surrounding communities are in the wake of 1998’s relentless hurricane season.