Witness intimidation involves witnesses crucial to court proceedings being threatened in order to pressure or extort them not to testify. The term “witness” is used to refer both to victims and to bystanders who could provide information to police. The term “victim” is used to denote the victim of the initial crime. The refusal of key witnesses to testify commonly renders a case with inadequate physical evidence void in a court of law. This is a significant problem that has many lawmakers considering tough penalties for intimidating a witness as in example the state of Kansas, where it is a criminal misdemeanor, or, if found to be aggravated a felony. How common is witness intimidation? It is difficult to know because the crime is greatly under reported and also when intimidation is successful neither the intimidation nor the original crime are reported. Many witnesses drop out of the investigation process long before an indictment or court appearance. Witness intimidation plays a role in many types of crime. Witness intimidation, however, is not the same as repeat victimization. Although in both cases the same offenders may be responsible for multiple events, their motives are different. In witness intimidation, the intent is to discourage the victim from reporting a crime to police or from cooperating with prosecutors, whereas in repeat victimization, the motive is often acquisitive. Medical Whistleblowers who witness criminal activity or have been victimized by a crime are sometimes reluctant to come forward and report incidents to police or to assist in the prosecution of offenders. In the medical community there are generalized community norms that discourage doctors, nurses and other medical professionals from cooperating with a criminal investigation.
Witness intimidation involves witnesses crucial to court proceedings being threatened in order to pressure or extort them not to testify. The term “witness” is used to refer both to victims and to bystanders who could provide information to police. The term “victim” is used to denote the victim of the initial crime. The refusal of key witnesses to testify commonly renders a case with inadequate physical evidence void in a court of law. This is a significant problem that has many lawmakers considering tough penalties for intimidating a witness as in example the state of Kansas, where it is a criminal misdemeanor, or, if found to be aggravated a felony. How common is witness intimidation? It is difficult to know because the crime is greatly under reported and also when intimidation is successful neither the intimidation nor the original crime are reported. Many witnesses drop out of the investigation process long before an indictment or court appearance. Witness intimidation plays a role in many types of crime. Witness intimidation, however, is not the same as repeat victimization. Although in both cases the same offenders may be responsible for multiple events, their motives are different. In witness intimidation, the intent is to discourage the victim from reporting a crime to police or from cooperating with prosecutors, whereas in repeat victimization, the motive is often acquisitive. Medical Whistleblowers who witness criminal activity or have been victimized by a crime are sometimes reluctant to come forward and report incidents to police or to assist in the prosecution of offenders. In the medical community there are generalized community norms that discourage doctors, nurses and other medical professionals from cooperating with a criminal investigation.