Published on

1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide


  1. 1. Connecticut’s Crisisin Oral Health Care for Children What We Can Do About It Marty Milkovic Connecticut Oral Health Initiative March 22, 2006
  2. 2. BackgroundThe Connecticut Oral Health Initiative (COHI)• Founded in 1993 as a committee of the CT State Dental Association• Founder: Dr. Howard Mark• Spun off as an independent non-profit organization in 2004 with a Board of Directors• Funded by donations and grants
  3. 3. BackgroundThe Connecticut Oral Health Initiative (COHI)• An advocacy organization on oral health issues• Work with all the oral health professional organizations, other groups and individuals• Email list: Alerts and Updates• Legislative and Administrative advocacy• Collaborative• Mission: “Oral Health for All”• Current Focus: Kids on HUSKY (Medicaid)
  4. 4. BackgroundMarty Milkovic• COHI Executive Director• 30 years in health & human services• 20 years in the United Way system• Adjunct Faculty, UConn School of Social Work
  5. 5. The Oral Health Crisis for Children• Large numbers of our children lack access to basic oral health care.• Many are at high risk and their lack of needed care will lead to more severe and expensive problems.• Poor children suffer the most, and we all pay for it.• What Can Be Done
  6. 6. Our Children face increased risks• Every child should have a dental home no later than age one. 1 Few do.• Oral health problems lead to more missed school days than any other type of health problem. Three out of 100 children miss school because of dental pain. 2• The lack of dental care in children can lead to extensive dental disease, hospitalization for acute infections, increased risk of disease in permanent teeth, extensive pain and poor nutrition. 3
  7. 7. Our Children face increased risks• More than twice as many children lack dental insurance as lack medical insurance. 4• Tooth decay is five times more common than asthma & seven times more common than hay fever in children. 4• Tooth decay is the single most common chronic disease among children. 4• Thousands of Connecticut‟s children have dental problems severe enough to wake up with a toothache - or fail to fall asleep because of one. 4
  8. 8. Poor Children Suffer the Most• Eighty percent of dental disease is found in only one quarter of the children. Low income children are much more likely to suffer this disease but are also much less likely to obtain dental care. 4• Children in poverty suffer from twice as much tooth decay as their more affluent peers. 5• Three times more of America‟s children are in need of dental services than medical services, yet children with public insurance are only one-quarter as likely to see a dentist as they are to see a physician. 4
  9. 9. HUSKY children don’t get the care they need• In a 2006 study, only 27% of persistent „mystery shoppers‟ were able to get a preventive dental appointment for a HUSKY child. 6• 67% of children enrolled in HUSKY A for all or any part of 2004 received no dental care. 2 Even among children continuously enrolled in HUSKY A in 2005, the best of circumstances, over half received no dental care. 7• Connecticut‟s dental reimbursement fees under HUSKY have been frozen since 1993 & are less than the 10TH percentile of dentists‟ fees. 8
  10. 10. HUSKY children don’t get the care they needState Payments for Dental Insurance25201510 5 0 per person per month State employees, their Children & Dependents ($22+)† HUSKY Children ($8)‡ Proposed 70th Percentile ($14.50)*
  11. 11. The Lawsuit 9• Over six years ago, legal aid attorneys filed a lawsuit against the State for not providing dental care to children on HUSKY as provided by Federal Medicaid law and regulation.• During the 2006 legislative session, a bill to raise rates to the 70TH percentile (HB 5790) was approved by the Public Health Committee and the Appropriations Committee.• In the final 2006 budget negotiations, the State indicated that they would be interested in settling the lawsuit as the way to solve the problem. The bill was withdrawn.
  12. 12. The Lawsuit 9• With no settlement in sight, legislation similar to last session‟s HB 5790 is necessary to make sure that HUSKY children do not suffer for another year.• Safety net facilities are part of the solution, but 2/3 of HUSKY children are seen by private providers, raising rates will have the most immediate impact, with no additional infrastructure costs. In addition a number of clinics and school-based programs receive the HUSKY dental reimbursement rate to cover their expenses and an increase will expand their capacity.
  13. 13. Preventive Oral Health Can Save Money• In 2004 HUSKY children made more than 77,000 emergency visits to dentists, because of difficulty in obtaining timely routine care that would have prevented a crisis. Nearly 10% of all Medicaid dollars are expended for emergency or palliative care. 10• Low income children who have a first preventive dental visit by age one are less likely to have subsequent restorative care or emergency room visits. Their average dental costs are almost 40% lower ($263 vs. $447) over a five year period than children who receive their first preventive visit after age one.11• A 3-year aggregate comparison of Medicaid revealed that it is ten times more costly to treat dental emergencies in a hospital ($6,498) than to provide preventive treatment in a dental office ($660). 12
  14. 14. If Rates are Raised more Kids will Get Help300 new dentists have pledged to seeHUSKY patients for the first time and 80current providers have pledged to seemore HUSKY children. Now between 100and 150 dentists actively see significantnumbers of HUSKY patients. 13
  15. 15. If Rates are Raised more Kids will Get Help HUSKY Dentists0 100 200 300 400 Now (8) New Pledges (13)
  16. 16. If Rates are Raised more Kids will Get Help• If these new dentists see only one new HUSKY patient a week, nearly 20,000 additional children would receive services. Now HUSKY providers seeing less than 500 patients per year average 3 HUSKY patients a week. This would mean that 60% of continuously enrolled 3 to 19 year-old HUSKY children would be able to access needed dental care.10• Nine other states (Alabama, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee) have increased Medicaid to the 75TH percentile or a comparable market based rate. All have shown substantial increase in private provider participation, ranging from 21% to over 1,000%, with an average increase of 74%.14
  17. 17. The Solution Raise HUSKY Dental Reimbursement Rates to the 70TH Percentile of Dentists Feesas defined by the National DentalAdvisory Service Comprehensive Fee Report
  18. 18. The SolutionProcedure Current 70TH PercentileInitial Exam $24 $65Cleaning 22 52Sealant 18 42Amalgam – 2 surface 38 126Stainless Steel Crown 85 207Extraction – single 33 122
  19. 19. The Solution• Two active bills in this session of the General Assembly would raise the rates: – HB 7069 Currently in the Public Health Committee – HB 7375 Just passed the Human Services Committee• Both headed for the Appropriations Committee
  20. 20. The Solution• Right Now: – Call/Contact members of the Public Health Committee – Join COHI‟s email list (• Soon: – The Appropriations Committee – Your Legislators – The Governor
  21. 21. Questions
  22. 22. THANK YOUMarty
  23. 23. Endnotes† State of Connecticut - ‡ American Dental Association, State Innovations to Improve Access to Oral Health Care for Low Income Children: A Compendium Update. Chicago: American Dental Association: 2005 - * Estimate derived from (†), (‡) and Beazoglou T, Douglass JM. HUSKY A Dental Care: Financial Strategies. Policy Brief. Connecticut Health Foundation, January 20061 Policy on the Dental Home, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 20042 Oral Health in America, United States Surgeon General, 20013 Joanna M. Douglas, B.D.S., D.D.S, consultant to the Connecticut Health Foundation, Oral Health Care of the Public Policy Map, Connecticut Health Foundation, 20044 Elements of Effective Action to Improve Oral Health & Access to Dental Care for Connecticut’s Children & Families, Children‟s Fund of Connecticut and Connecticut Health Foundation, 20015 Oral Health Care of the Public Policy Map, Connecticut Health Foundation, 20046 State of Connecticut, Department of Social Services Mystery Shopper Project, Nan Jeannero and Kerry McGuire, Mercer Government Human Services Consulting, Phoenix, November, 20067 Dental Care for Children in HUSKY A: Methods and Findings, Connecticut Voices for Children, October 20068 Beazoglou T, Douglass JM. HUSKY A Dental Care: Financial Strategies. Policy Brief. Connecticut Health Foundation, January 20069 Update RE Carr v. Wilson-Coker, Medicaid Dental Care Litigation, Greater Hartford Legal Aid, February 16, 200710 Analysis of HUSKY Encounter Data by JM Douglass, February 200711 Early Preventive Visits: Effects on Subsequent Utilization and Costs, Pediatrics 2004, 11412 Disparities in Oral Health and Access to Care: Findings of National Surveys, Ambulatory Pediatrics, March-April 200213 Survey by the Connecticut State Dental Association and the Connecticut Society of Pediatric Dentists, January 200714 HUSKY A Dental Care: Avoiding the Repercussions of Poor Dental Care for Children on Medicaid. Policy Brief. Connecticut Health Foundation, February 2007