Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

ASE 2017 Intro slides

277 views

Published on

Opening slides for the ASE 2017 conference http://ase2017.org

Published in: Software
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

ASE 2017 Intro slides

  1. 1. Grigore Rosu, General Chair
 Massimiliano Di Penta & Tien N. Nguyen, Program Chairs
 David Lo & Alexander Pretschner, Tool Chairs
  2. 2. ASE 2017 Attendees: 310 from 26 Countries
  3. 3. ASE 2017 Attendees: 310 from 26 Countries Argen&na: 3 Australia:2 Austria: 3 Brazil: 5 Canada: 15 China: 33 Colombia: 1 France: 5 Germany: 17 Hong Kong: 1 India: 3 Italy: 8 Japan: 3 Luxembourg: 1 Netherlands: 4 Saudi Arabia: 2 Singapore: 6 Slovakia: 1 South Africa: 2 South Korea: 14 Spain: 2 Sri Lanka: 1 Sweden: 2 Switzerland: 1 United Kingdom: 11 United States: 164United States 53% China 11% South Korea 5% Canada 5% Germany 5% United Kingdom 4%
  4. 4. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Wright St Urbana Champaign
  5. 5. What UIUC is (not) known for
 See Wikipedia • Not for its skyscrapers, mountains, or shopping centers • But faculty and alumni invented or co-invented: • LED; integrated circuit; transistor; pH meter; MRI; plasma screen • JavaScript; LLVM • … and founded or co-founded: • Oracle; YouTube; AMD; PayPal; Yelp!; Tesla Motors; Siebel Systems; Lotus • Mosaic browser; Netscape; Firefox; Safari; Mortal Kombat • Delta Air Lines; Beckman Instruments; National Football League; Playboy; … • … and they got • 28 Nobel prizes (John Bardeen, the only person to have won twice in Physics) • 22 Pulitzer prizes
  6. 6. EXIT You are here! 1st Floor 2nd Floor 4th Floor Use these room for - Technical discussions - Talk preparation - Interviews Illini Union
 Layout
  7. 7. Welcome Reception
 Tuesday, 5:30 – 8:30pm No smoking campus Not even outside Not even after sunset Open bar
  8. 8. Program at a Glance Daily Schedule Registration & Breakfast 9:00 Invited talk 10:00 – 10:30 Coffee 10:30 – 12:30 Session 1 12:30 – 1:30 Lunch 1:30 – 3:30 Session 2 3:30 – 4:00 Coffee 4:00 – 5:30 Session 3 Social event
  9. 9. Illini Union Alumni Center 10 min Banquet
 Wednesday, 6 – 9 pm Will perform at banquet You must have this! Please return it if you don’t need it. ?
  10. 10. Illini UnionTour (1) & Reception (2)
 Thursday, 4:30 – 9 pm 30 m in1 2 3 min Blue Waters: one of the most powerful supercomputers I-Hotel
  11. 11. Internet Also eduroam Power Limited supply (75)
  12. 12. Volunteers
  13. 13. Organizing
 Committee
 (3,000+ messages) General Chair Program Committee Reviews Process Tool Demonstrations Sponsorship Local Finance Workshops Doctoral Symposium Tutorials Proceedings Conference Organization Publicity Student Volunteers Webmasters
  14. 14. Sponsors
  15. 15. ASE 2017 TECHNICAL PROGRAM Massimiliano Di Penta University of Sannio, Italy Tien N. Nguyen Univ. ofTexas at Dallas, USA
  16. 16. PAPER CATEGORIES Research Experience New Idea
  17. 17. ABSTRACT SUBMISSIONSAbstracts 0 125 250 375 500 Date (Midnight AOE) Apr 5 Apr 10 Apr 15 Apr 20 Apr 25 Apr 30 May 5 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 8 8 10 10 10 11 12 14 17 17 17 18 23 33 71 184 495
  18. 18. REVIEWING PROCESS 20 desk rejected 1 withdrawn Reviewing 236 pre-rejected 43 rejected 18 pre-accepted 45 accepted 14 cond. accepted 11 reclassified 495 Abstracts 5 May 367 papers to review 17 May Online Discussion 22 June PC Meeting 8-9 July Papers’ scrutiny 388 Papers 12 May 113 papers 6 July
  19. 19. DETAILED OUTCOME • 65 technical papers (21%), 3 distinguished papers • 2 experience papers (25%), 1 best paper • 10 new ideas papers (22%) • 9 out of 11 technical reclassified as new idea
  20. 20. OPENNESS PC/ERP Papers Other Papers Fisher’s exact test p-value=1 - Odds Ratio=1.02
  21. 21. SUBMISSIONSTREND 0 100 200 300 400 2014 2015 2016 2017 45 35 2847 9 1414 19 313 284275257 Technical Experience New ideas 323 317 333 367
  22. 22. 623,810 WORDS 1,464 DISCUSSION POSTS SOME FIGURES… 1,121 REVIEWS
  23. 23. PERCEIVED REVIEW QUALITY 100 responses out of 
 1,195 authors 54% had their paperrejected 6 distinguished reviewers 0246810 Rating
  24. 24. 11% 11% 16% 78% 72% 62% 11% 18% 22% Justification.of.the.outcome Qualified.Reviewers Useful.feedback.to.improve.the.work 100 50 0 50 100 Percentage Response Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree Outcome justified by reviews Qualified reviewers Useful to improve work 11% 11% 16% 78% 72% 62%22% 18% 11%
  25. 25. SUBMISSIONS PER COUNTRY United States China Germany Canada United Kingdom Brazil Singapore Italy Australia Japan Netherlands South Korea India Austria Hong Kong Luxembourg Spain France Switzerland Norway Others # of normalized papers 0 30 60 90 120 150 23 3 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 10 10 11 12 14 15 27 66 123
  26. 26. ACCEPTED/REJECTED United States China Germany United Kingdom Italy Singapore Canada Australia South Korea Netherlands Brazil Sweden Spain Japan Austria Luxembourg Argentina Slovakia Others Number of normalized papers 0 35 70 105 140 33 1 4 5 7 3 1 10 5 5 7 11 7 6 9 20 53 93 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 6 7 13 30 Accepted Rejected
  27. 27. SUBMISSIONTOPICSTesting, verification, and validation Software analysis Empirical software engineering Maintenance and evolution Data mining for software engineering Automated reasoning techniques Program comprehension Program synthesis & transform., automated repair Software security and trust; data privacy Recommender systems for software engineering Reverse engineering and re-engineering Model-driven development Mobile app development Software architecture and design Human-computer interaction Requirements engineering Component-based service-oriented systems Software product line engineering Specification languages Computer-supported cooperative work Cloud computing Knowledge acquisition and management Configuration management Domain modeling and meta-modeling Software visualization Number of normalized papers 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 5 6 7 7 8 9 11 11 13 13 14 22 25 26 31 32 32 34 37 43 69 73 79 92 167
  28. 28. SUBMISSIONS ABOUT…
  29. 29. ACCEPTED PAPERS Testing, verification, and validation Software analysis Empirical software engineering Maintenance and evolution Data mining for software engineering Automated reasoning techniques Program comprehension Program synthesis & transform., automated repair Software security and trust; data privacy Reverse engineering and re-engineering Recommender systems for software engineering Mobile app development Requirements engineering Software product line engineering Computer-supported cooperative work Knowledge acquisition and management Model-driven development Human-computer interaction Component-based service-oriented systems Software architecture and design Configuration management Domain modeling and meta-modeling Specification languages Software visualization Cloud computing Accepted papers (normalized) 0 10 20 30 40 0 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 6 7 8 8 8 11 14 15 16 21 24 37
  30. 30. ACCEPTED PAPERS ABOUT…
  31. 31. ACCEPTANCE RATE PERTOPIC Knowledge acquisition and management Computer-supported cooperative work Software product line engineering Domain modeling and meta-modeling Automated reasoning techniques Requirements engineering Program comprehension Configuration management Empirical software engineering Software analysis Reverse engineering and re-engineering Software security and trust; data privacy Mobile app development Program synthesis & transform., automated repair Component-based service-oriented systems Testing, verification, and validation Maintenance and evolution Recommender systems for software engineering Data mining for software engineering Human-computer interaction Software visualization Model-driven development Software architecture and design Specification languages Cloud computing 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 0% 9% 9% 12% 20% 21% 22% 22% 22% 22% 23% 24% 24% 25% 26% 26% 27% 29% 30% 31% 33% 33% 36% 44% 57%
  32. 32. JOURNAL FIRST PAPERS • Automated Software Engineering Journal (ASEJ) papers • Published since Jan 2016, no extension of previous work • 13 invited, 6 accepted the invitation • Interleaved with the rest of the technical program Thanks to Robert Hall,ASEJ Editor-In-Chief!
  33. 33. TECHNICAL SESSIONS • Mix of Research, Experience, New Ideas and Journal First papers • Presentation+Q&A slots • 10 min. for offline questions at the end of the session Presentation (long) q&a Pres. (short) q&a Offline q&a 17 min . . . 8 min 10 min5 min 3 min
  34. 34. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  35. 35. PROGRAM COMMITTEE
  36. 36. EXPERT REVIEW PANEL Sven Apel, Benoit Baudry, Eric Bodden, Cristian Cadar, Sarfraz Khurshid, Marsha Chechik, Jane Cleland-Huang, Elisabetta Di Nitto, Gordon Fraser, Milos Gligoric, Mark Grechanik, Paul Grünbacher, John Grundy, Yue Jia, Yasutaka Kamei, Moonzoo Kim, Mario Linares-Vasquez, Darko Marinov, Leandro Minku, Sarah Nadi, Shiva Nejati, Sebastiano Panichella, Corina Pasareanu, Martin Pinzger, Denys Poshyvanyk, Baishakhi Ray, Houari A. Sahraoui, Giuseppe Scanniello, Kathryn T. Stolee, Gabriele Taentzer, Lin Tan, NikolaosTsantalis, BurakTurhan, Lu Zhang
  37. 37. ADDITIONAL REVIEWERS Mathieu Acher, Iftekhar Ahmed, Carol Alexandru, Amin Alipour, Paul Ammann, Davide Arcelli, Deniz Arsan, Alberto Bacchelli, Alexandre Bartel, Edouard Batot, Stefanie Beyer,Thomas Bock, Chris Bogart, Johann Bourcier,Travis Breaux, Romain Brenguier, Caius Brindescu,Yuriy Brun, Nimrod Busany,Taejoon Byun, Saikat Chakraborty, Souti Chattopadhyay, Junjie Chen, Christina Chung, Andrea Di Sorbo, Nima Dini, Naipeng Dong, Zhen Dong, Gabriel Ferreira, Eduardo Figueiredo, Maxime Gaillais-Jimenez, Svetoslav Ganov, Elaheh Ghassabani, Divya Gopinath,Thomas Grassauer, Jianmei Guo,Alex Gyori, Quinn Hanam, Michael Hilton, Johannes Hofmeister, Bo Hu, Claus Hunsen, Boris Koepf, Pooyan Jamshidi, Harshavardhan Kadiyala, Rajdeep Kambo, Andreas Katis,Wael Kessentini, Ameya Ketkar, Hyunwoo Kim, Yunho Kim, Sergiy Kolesnikov, Thomas Krismayer, Daniel Kroening, Konstantin Kuznetsov, Duling Lai, Rafael Leano, Xia Li, Hyunsu Lim, Christian Macho, Muhammad Suleman Mahmood, Dongyu Mao, Reza Matinnejad, Davood Mazinanian, Jens Meinicke, Eric Mercer, Chihab Mokaddem, Federico Mora, Kevin Moran, Anitha Murugesan, Nicholas Nelson, Yannic Noller, Fabio Palomba, Matthew Patrick, Or Pistiner, Daniele Di Pompeo, Sebastian Proksch, Lina Qiu, Larissa Rocha, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Ripon Saha, Mohamed Aymen Saied, Adalberto Sampaio Jr., Florian Sattler, Simone Scalabrino, Martin Schäf, Geord Seibt, Rafi Shalom, August Shi, Seung Yeob Shin, Konrad Slind, Hui Song, Andreas Stahlbauer, Stefan Stanciulescu, Danielle Stewart, Andrea Stocco, Fang-Hsiang Su, Damian Tamburri, Shin Hwei Tan, Hao Tang, Michael Tautschni, Yuchi Tian, Oksana Tkachuk, Catia Trubiani, Rachel Tzoref-Brill, Marko Vasic, Christopher Vendome, Michael Vierhauser, C. Aaron Visaggio,Thomas Vogel, Kaiyuan Wang,Yingying Wang, Cody Watson,Andreas Woelfl, Chu-Pan Wong,Yingfei Xiong, Jie Zhang, Mengshi Zhang, Shurui Zhou, Eugenio Zimeo
  38. 38. Alexander Prestchner David Lo Singapore Management University Technical University 
 of Munich TOOL DEMOTRACK
  39. 39. DATES AND STATISTICS Submission July 2, 2017 NoFficaFon July 30, 2017 Camera Ready Sept 9, 2017 2 best papers (to be announced at the banquet)
  40. 40. SUBMITTED PER COUNTRY China USA Canada France Germany Italy United Kingdom Argentina Portugal Russia Austria Japan Netherlands Brazil Turkey Number of normalized papers 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1 1 1 1.3 1.5 2.1 2.1 2.9 8.5 8.7
  41. 41. ACCEPTED PER COUNTRY USA Canada Germany China France Italy Argentina Austria United Kingdom Japan Netherlands Brazil Turkey Number of normalized papers 0 2 4 6 8 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 7
  42. 42. TOOL DEMO COMMITTEE Gabriele Bavota, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Zhenyu Chen, Wolfgang Grieskamp, Lingxiao Jiang, Yasutaka Kamei, Marouane Kessentini, Julia Lawall, Yang Liu, Shahar Maoz, Leonardo Mariani, Martín Ochoa, Anita Sarma, Weiyi Shang, Daniel Varro, Marco Vieira, Sebastian Voss, Xin Xia, Zhenchang Xing, ShengqianYang,Thomas Zimmermann
  43. 43. KEYNOTE Gerard Holzmann Cobra - An Interactive Static Code Analyzer
  44. 44. KEYNOTE Jiawei Han Mining Structures from MassiveText Data: 
 Will it Help Software Engineering?
  45. 45. KEYNOTE Arie van Deursen Software Engineering without Borders

×