Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Session 40 Martin Li


Published on

Published in: Education, Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Session 40 Martin Li

  1. 1. Användning av andraderivator av Spårlägesparameterar för Värdering av Spårlägeskvaliten Martin Li Trafikverket, Underhåll / Ban o vägssystem / Spårsystem 78189, Borlänge, Sweden Transportforum 2012, 11-12 januari I Linköping1 2012-01-10
  2. 2. On the Use of Second-Order Derivatives of Track Irregularity for Assessing Track Geometry Quality Martin Li1 , Ingemar Persson2 , Jan Spännar1 and Mats Berg3 1. Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket), Borlänge, Sweden 2. AB DEsolver, Optand, Sweden 3. KTH, Rail Vehicles, Stockholm, Sweden 22nd IAVSD Symposium 14-19 August 2011 Manchester, UK The paper has been reviewed and accepted for publication on the journal Vehivle system Dynamics (VSD)2 2012-01-10
  3. 3. Background • Measuring and assessing track geometry quality play an important role for safety control and track maintenance. • By using a modern track recording car (TRC), track geometry data including longitudinal level, alignment, gauge, cross level and twist, are routinely collected and assessed. • Current standards and assessment methods are based on the track geometry data alone, by comparing isolated defects with predefined limit values and by computing their standard deviations • But it is the dynamic responses of vehicle and track that are relevant to safety, maintenance costs and ride comfort.3 2012-01-10
  4. 4. Track recording car (TRC) in Sweden STRIX Infranord SWE owns 1 pcs. principal Track record. veh. at TRV. New Track record. veh. is planned for 2010 (IMV 200 Infranord) delayed until 2011/12?4 2012-01-10
  5. 5. TRV Limit Values (BVF 587.02)5 2012-01-10
  6. 6. On-track test results: low correlation between Q-force and LL [5] T. Karis, Track Irregularities for High-Speed Trains, Master Thesis, KTH, 20096 2012-01-10
  7. 7. Not easy to detect Alert! > 9 mm Short waved irregularity No forces…. High forces !!7 2012-01-10
  8. 8. Motivations of using the derivatives of longitudinal level (LL2) • Only using amplitudes of isolated defects and standard deviations is neither sufficient for vehicle dynamics nor efficient for track maintenance • Without taking into account wavelength and defect shape, the correlation between amplitudes of isolated defects and wheel-rail force is low • Enhanced assessment can be made by Vehicle Response Analysis (VRA), e.g., Pupil by ProRail and VRA-method by DB. However, we observe: – VRA method tends to be very expensive and complex to use – Difficult to consider all vehicle types and all speed ranges – Most importantly, although the VRA-results are good, eventually, it is the track sections and defects that need to be inspected and identified so that appropriate correction maintenance can be taken. • Question: are the derivatives of track defects (LL2) useful?8 2012-01-10
  9. 9. Theoretical study: SDOF model The dynamic equation can be written as Transfer function from LL to z The wheel-rail contact force can be calculated as Note: it is LL2 not LL that contributes directly to the dynamic force due to unsprung mass.9 2012-01-10
  10. 10. Gensys simulation results LL LL2 Q_dyn • A modified regional passenger train • Vehicle model has been developed and verified by the Green train project at KTH [12] • Speed: V= 220 km/h10 2012-01-10
  11. 11. Gensys simulation results:• The correlation coefficient for Q_dyn – LL is only 0.17• The correlation coefficient for Q_dyn – LL2 is increased to 0.63 11 2012-01-10
  12. 12. Simulation results for three theoretical track defects (A) Single cosine, 10 m wavelength, ballast settlement (B) Sinusoidal and triangle, standard defect in S&Cs ([8]) (C) Harmonic function, 3 m wavelength, initial rail defect • Same amplitude: 4 mm • Different wavelength and shape • Different second-order derivatives • Different dynamic track forces12 2012-01-10
  13. 13. Summary • Current methods of assessing track geometry quality based on amplitudes of isolated defects and standard deviations are neither effective for planning track maintenance nor sufficient for evaluating vehicle dynamics • Theoretical study, simulation results and PSD analysis in this study demonstrate that the second-order derivatives of longitudinal level (LL2) can be used to enhance the assessment of vertical track geometry quality. • Advantages of using LL2: – wavelength and shape of track defects are considered – easy to use. • LL2 cannot and shall not replace the Vehicle Response Analysis (VRA) – When VRA is available, LL2 is useful to further characterise the track defect type – When VRA is not available, LL2 provides an effective analysis of track defects that potentially may result in severe vehicle responses13 2012-01-10
  14. 14. ‘Good’: normal track ’Bad’ : track shifted after a test run Both amplitude and 2nd derivatives are big! Thank you for your attention!14 2012-01-10