SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
SlideShare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Successfully reported this slideshow.
Activate your 14 day free trial to unlock unlimited reading.
The objective of this paper is to examine the impact of information and communication technologies on employment. Recently there have been increasing concerns over how the accelerating development of artificial intelligence and automation will affect jobs.
Given this setting we specifically wish to answer the following questions:
What are the economic and political factors that may lead to the elimination of jobs through ICTs and automation?
Are new jobs being created better and is the turnover to new jobs fast enough to Shumpeter’s creative destruction?
Are public policies required to address this problem? If so, which policies?
In this paper relies on existing research to determine give us some insights about such debate.
The paper concludes with policy recommendations.
The objective of this paper is to examine the impact of information and communication technologies on employment. Recently there have been increasing concerns over how the accelerating development of artificial intelligence and automation will affect jobs.
Given this setting we specifically wish to answer the following questions:
What are the economic and political factors that may lead to the elimination of jobs through ICTs and automation?
Are new jobs being created better and is the turnover to new jobs fast enough to Shumpeter’s creative destruction?
Are public policies required to address this problem? If so, which policies?
In this paper relies on existing research to determine give us some insights about such debate.
The paper concludes with policy recommendations.
4.
COST
REDUCTION
TECHNOLOGI
ES
ICT, Internet
SUPPLY
(Technology,
outsourcing)
DEMAND
(populationgrowth,
marketing,net
exports)
5.
COST
REDUCTION
TECHNOLOGI
ES
ICT, Internet
Automation,
robotics
SUPPLY
(Technology,
outsourcing)
EXISTING
INDUSTRIES
DEMAND
(populationgrowth,
marketing,net
exports)
6.
COST
REDUCTION
TECHNOLOGI
ES
Delayed
substitutes
(slow decline)
Adjustment
-
ICT, Internet
Automation,
robotics
IT and high skill
jobs
SUPPLY
(Technology,
outsourcing)
EXISTING
INDUSTRIES
NEW
INDUSTRIES
DEMAND
(populationgrowth,
marketing,net
exports)
7.
COST
REDUCTION
TECHNOLOGI
ES
ICT, Internet
Automation,
robotics
SUPPLY
(Technology,
outsourcing)
NEW
INDUSTRIES
DEMAND
(populationgrowth,
marketing,net
exports)
8.
IT and high skill
jobs
SUPPLY
(Technology,
outsourcing)
NEW
INDUSTRIES
DEMAND
(populationgrowth,
marketing,net
exports)
10.
COST
REDUCTION
TECHNOLOGI
ES
Delayed
substitutes
(slow decline)
Instant substitutes
(rapid decline)
Adjustment
Unemployment/
Underemployment-
ICT, Internet
Automation,
robotics
IT and high skill
jobs
SUPPLY
(Technology,
outsourcing)
EXISTING
INDUSTRIES
NEW
INDUSTRIES
DEMAND
(populationgrowth,
marketing,net
exports)
Human behavior
Government
policies
(education/trainin
g, income
distribution),
11.
ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
History of technological advance
overall employment
But this time could be different (middle skills, extent of disruption)
Income distribution
Winner take all markets (Frank and Cook, 2010)
Compensation divergent from apparent value of the product of labor
Minor differences in skill and algorithms
Acceleration of a trend in stagnation and decline of low and middle incomes
Technological advance benefits society as a whole but the disruption often hurts individuals
Potential for decline of mass markets (Ford, 2009)
Freelancing brings inconsistent income
12.
ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
Solutions?
Retraining/education insufficient
Side payments: redistribution of wealth
Just: small differences in winner take all markets
Necessary: decline of mass markets could collapse economy hurting the rich also
Transforming the welfare state
Basic subsistence income
Replace the patchwork of means tested programs (and related bureaucracy)
Avoid perverse incentives and graduation problems (100%+ effective tax rates)
Reduces risk of entrepreneurial activity/freelancing
Need for experimentation
Job sharing
Minimum wage
Ownership stake
13.
CONCLUSIONS
Globalization is exerting competitive pressure to:
Introduce cost savings technologies
Introduce new technologies for differentiation purposes
Supply factors are putting downward pressure on employment
Some technologies provide time for adaptation
Some technologies have an instantaneous effect on employment
Industries are generating STEM related jobs but the number of STEM jobs is
most likely insufficient to absorb layoffs
Government policies will need to be put in place for address the short term
and possible long term negative effects
0 likes
Be the first to like this
Views
Total views
285
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
You have now unlocked unlimited access to 20M+ documents!
Unlimited Reading
Learn faster and smarter from top experts
Unlimited Downloading
Download to take your learnings offline and on the go
You also get free access to Scribd!
Instant access to millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, podcasts and more.
Read and listen offline with any device.
Free access to premium services like Tuneln, Mubi and more.